Cargando…

709. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam–Durlobactam (ETX2514SUL) Against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species

BACKGROUND: The genus Burkholderia contains several pathogenic species with distinct etiologies, including Burkholderia pseudomallei the biothreat pathogen responsible for melioidosis and Burkholderia mallei which causes glanders. β-Lactams, such as ceftazidime and meropenem, are important therapeut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Donnell, John, Miller, Alita, Lane, Douglas, Panchal, Rekha, Mueller, John P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811307/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.777
_version_ 1783462451666223104
author O’Donnell, John
Miller, Alita
Lane, Douglas
Panchal, Rekha
Mueller, John P
author_facet O’Donnell, John
Miller, Alita
Lane, Douglas
Panchal, Rekha
Mueller, John P
author_sort O’Donnell, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The genus Burkholderia contains several pathogenic species with distinct etiologies, including Burkholderia pseudomallei the biothreat pathogen responsible for melioidosis and Burkholderia mallei which causes glanders. β-Lactams, such as ceftazidime and meropenem, are important therapeutic options for these infections. However, clinical resistance to β-lactams, which is primarily mediated by multiple types of β-lactamases in these species, is a growing concern. Durlobactam (ETX2514, DUR) is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with broad-spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Sulbactam (SUL) is an Ambler Class A β-lactamase inhibitor with intrinsic antibacterial activity against a limited number of species, including Acinetobacter spp. SUL-DUR is currently in Phase 3 clinical testing for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections caused by Acinetobacter spp. In this study, SUL-DUR was tested for in vitro antibacterial activity against B. pseudomallei and B. mallei as well as for in vivo efficacy in a preclinical model of melioidosis. METHODS: The antibacterial activity of SUL alone or in combination with DUR (fixed at 4 mg/L) against B. pseudomallei (n = 30) and B. mallei (N = 28) was determined following CLSI guidelines. In vivo efficacy was tested in an acute murine model of melioidosis in which 4 × 10(4) cfu Bp K96423 (SUL-DUR MIC = 1 mg/L) was administered intranasally to BalbC mice. SUL-DUR (100/200 or 400/200 mg/kg) was administered q4h subcutaneously 4 hours post-challenge for 6 days and murine survival was monitored for 45 days. Doxycycline (DOX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) were dosed as positive controls at 40 mg/kg q12 h for 6 days. RESULTS: The addition of DUR effectively lowered the SUL MIC(50/90) from 8/16 to 0.25/0.5 mg/L vs. B. pseudomallei and from 8/8 to 1/2 mg/L for B. mallei. All untreated mice in the melioidosis model succumbed to infection within 3 days of challenge. 60% survival was observed for both dose arms of SUL-DUR as compared with 40% survival observed for both CIP and DOX. CONCLUSION: Preliminary preclinical data demonstrating robust in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of SUL-DUR against Burkholderia spp. suggests this combination may be an effective new therapy for the treatment of these challenging pathogens. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68113072019-10-29 709. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam–Durlobactam (ETX2514SUL) Against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species O’Donnell, John Miller, Alita Lane, Douglas Panchal, Rekha Mueller, John P Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The genus Burkholderia contains several pathogenic species with distinct etiologies, including Burkholderia pseudomallei the biothreat pathogen responsible for melioidosis and Burkholderia mallei which causes glanders. β-Lactams, such as ceftazidime and meropenem, are important therapeutic options for these infections. However, clinical resistance to β-lactams, which is primarily mediated by multiple types of β-lactamases in these species, is a growing concern. Durlobactam (ETX2514, DUR) is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with broad-spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Sulbactam (SUL) is an Ambler Class A β-lactamase inhibitor with intrinsic antibacterial activity against a limited number of species, including Acinetobacter spp. SUL-DUR is currently in Phase 3 clinical testing for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections caused by Acinetobacter spp. In this study, SUL-DUR was tested for in vitro antibacterial activity against B. pseudomallei and B. mallei as well as for in vivo efficacy in a preclinical model of melioidosis. METHODS: The antibacterial activity of SUL alone or in combination with DUR (fixed at 4 mg/L) against B. pseudomallei (n = 30) and B. mallei (N = 28) was determined following CLSI guidelines. In vivo efficacy was tested in an acute murine model of melioidosis in which 4 × 10(4) cfu Bp K96423 (SUL-DUR MIC = 1 mg/L) was administered intranasally to BalbC mice. SUL-DUR (100/200 or 400/200 mg/kg) was administered q4h subcutaneously 4 hours post-challenge for 6 days and murine survival was monitored for 45 days. Doxycycline (DOX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) were dosed as positive controls at 40 mg/kg q12 h for 6 days. RESULTS: The addition of DUR effectively lowered the SUL MIC(50/90) from 8/16 to 0.25/0.5 mg/L vs. B. pseudomallei and from 8/8 to 1/2 mg/L for B. mallei. All untreated mice in the melioidosis model succumbed to infection within 3 days of challenge. 60% survival was observed for both dose arms of SUL-DUR as compared with 40% survival observed for both CIP and DOX. CONCLUSION: Preliminary preclinical data demonstrating robust in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of SUL-DUR against Burkholderia spp. suggests this combination may be an effective new therapy for the treatment of these challenging pathogens. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811307/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.777 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
O’Donnell, John
Miller, Alita
Lane, Douglas
Panchal, Rekha
Mueller, John P
709. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam–Durlobactam (ETX2514SUL) Against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species
title 709. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam–Durlobactam (ETX2514SUL) Against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species
title_full 709. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam–Durlobactam (ETX2514SUL) Against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species
title_fullStr 709. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam–Durlobactam (ETX2514SUL) Against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species
title_full_unstemmed 709. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam–Durlobactam (ETX2514SUL) Against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species
title_short 709. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam–Durlobactam (ETX2514SUL) Against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species
title_sort 709. in vitro antibacterial activity and in vivo efficacy of sulbactam–durlobactam (etx2514sul) against pathogenic burkholderia species
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811307/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.777
work_keys_str_mv AT odonnelljohn 709invitroantibacterialactivityandinvivoefficacyofsulbactamdurlobactametx2514sulagainstpathogenicburkholderiaspecies
AT milleralita 709invitroantibacterialactivityandinvivoefficacyofsulbactamdurlobactametx2514sulagainstpathogenicburkholderiaspecies
AT lanedouglas 709invitroantibacterialactivityandinvivoefficacyofsulbactamdurlobactametx2514sulagainstpathogenicburkholderiaspecies
AT panchalrekha 709invitroantibacterialactivityandinvivoefficacyofsulbactamdurlobactametx2514sulagainstpathogenicburkholderiaspecies
AT muellerjohnp 709invitroantibacterialactivityandinvivoefficacyofsulbactamdurlobactametx2514sulagainstpathogenicburkholderiaspecies