Cargando…
Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety
Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with snare is the recommended technique to resect non-invasive colorectal neoplastic lesions between 10 and 30 mm in diameter. The objective of EMR is to resect completely the neoplastic tissue en bloc and preferably with free margins (R0), avoiding rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9068 |
_version_ | 1783462460007645184 |
---|---|
author | Pioche, Mathieu Wallenhorst, Timothée Lepetit, Hugo Lépilliez, Vincent Rivory, Jérôme Legros, Romain Rostain, Florian Bianchi, Laurent Charissoux, Aurélie Hervieu, Valérie Moreno-Garcia, Maira Robinson, Philip Saurin, Jean-Christophe Ponchon, Thierry Viprey, Marie Roche, Laurent Subtil, Fabien Jacques, Jérémie |
author_facet | Pioche, Mathieu Wallenhorst, Timothée Lepetit, Hugo Lépilliez, Vincent Rivory, Jérôme Legros, Romain Rostain, Florian Bianchi, Laurent Charissoux, Aurélie Hervieu, Valérie Moreno-Garcia, Maira Robinson, Philip Saurin, Jean-Christophe Ponchon, Thierry Viprey, Marie Roche, Laurent Subtil, Fabien Jacques, Jérémie |
author_sort | Pioche, Mathieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with snare is the recommended technique to resect non-invasive colorectal neoplastic lesions between 10 and 30 mm in diameter. The objective of EMR is to resect completely the neoplastic tissue en bloc and preferably with free margins (R0), avoiding recurrences. Anchoring the tip of the snare in the submucosa is a technical trick that allows snare sliding to be reduced and larger pieces to be caught. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anchoring-EMR (A-EMR). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of A-EMR procedures for lesions of diameter between 10 and 30 mm (endoscopic evaluation) performed consecutively in four French centers between May 2017 and January 2018. A-EMR was routinely performed for all EMR using Olympus conventional snares (10 or 25 mm). The primary outcome was evaluation of the proportion of R0 resections. Results A total of 141 A-EMR procedures were performed by 10 operators. Mean lesion size was 19.8 mm. Anchoring was feasible in 96.5 % of cases. There were 81.6 % en bloc resections and 70.2 % R0 resections, with the percentage of procedures decreasing with increasing lesion size (82.8 % < 20 mm, 55.3 % 21 – 30 mm, and 50.0 % > 30 mm, P = 0.002). Complete perforations closed endoscopically occurred in 3/141 cases (2.1 %); none occurred in lesions < 20 mm in size (0 /87). Conclusion The A-EMR technique appears to be promising with a high proportion of R0 for lesions of 10 – 20 mm in size without any perforations. It could also offer an alternative to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or to hybrid techniques to reach R0 for lesions between 20 and 30 mm in size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6811348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68113482019-11-01 Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety Pioche, Mathieu Wallenhorst, Timothée Lepetit, Hugo Lépilliez, Vincent Rivory, Jérôme Legros, Romain Rostain, Florian Bianchi, Laurent Charissoux, Aurélie Hervieu, Valérie Moreno-Garcia, Maira Robinson, Philip Saurin, Jean-Christophe Ponchon, Thierry Viprey, Marie Roche, Laurent Subtil, Fabien Jacques, Jérémie Endosc Int Open Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with snare is the recommended technique to resect non-invasive colorectal neoplastic lesions between 10 and 30 mm in diameter. The objective of EMR is to resect completely the neoplastic tissue en bloc and preferably with free margins (R0), avoiding recurrences. Anchoring the tip of the snare in the submucosa is a technical trick that allows snare sliding to be reduced and larger pieces to be caught. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anchoring-EMR (A-EMR). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of A-EMR procedures for lesions of diameter between 10 and 30 mm (endoscopic evaluation) performed consecutively in four French centers between May 2017 and January 2018. A-EMR was routinely performed for all EMR using Olympus conventional snares (10 or 25 mm). The primary outcome was evaluation of the proportion of R0 resections. Results A total of 141 A-EMR procedures were performed by 10 operators. Mean lesion size was 19.8 mm. Anchoring was feasible in 96.5 % of cases. There were 81.6 % en bloc resections and 70.2 % R0 resections, with the percentage of procedures decreasing with increasing lesion size (82.8 % < 20 mm, 55.3 % 21 – 30 mm, and 50.0 % > 30 mm, P = 0.002). Complete perforations closed endoscopically occurred in 3/141 cases (2.1 %); none occurred in lesions < 20 mm in size (0 /87). Conclusion The A-EMR technique appears to be promising with a high proportion of R0 for lesions of 10 – 20 mm in size without any perforations. It could also offer an alternative to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or to hybrid techniques to reach R0 for lesions between 20 and 30 mm in size. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-11 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811348/ /pubmed/31673623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9068 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Pioche, Mathieu Wallenhorst, Timothée Lepetit, Hugo Lépilliez, Vincent Rivory, Jérôme Legros, Romain Rostain, Florian Bianchi, Laurent Charissoux, Aurélie Hervieu, Valérie Moreno-Garcia, Maira Robinson, Philip Saurin, Jean-Christophe Ponchon, Thierry Viprey, Marie Roche, Laurent Subtil, Fabien Jacques, Jérémie Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety |
title | Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety |
title_full | Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety |
title_short | Endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety |
title_sort | endoscopic mucosal resection with anchoring of the snare tip: multicenter retrospective evaluation of effectiveness and safety |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0990-9068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piochemathieu endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT wallenhorsttimothee endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT lepetithugo endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT lepilliezvincent endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT rivoryjerome endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT legrosromain endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT rostainflorian endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT bianchilaurent endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT charissouxaurelie endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT hervieuvalerie endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT morenogarciamaira endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT robinsonphilip endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT saurinjeanchristophe endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT ponchonthierry endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT vipreymarie endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT rochelaurent endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT subtilfabien endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety AT jacquesjeremie endoscopicmucosalresectionwithanchoringofthesnaretipmulticenterretrospectiveevaluationofeffectivenessandsafety |