Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel endoscopic procedure designed to facilitate sustained luminal patency in patients with gastric outlet obstruction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-GE for treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarty, Thomas R., Garg, Rajat, Thompson, Christopher C., Rustagi, Tarun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8178
_version_ 1783462461237624832
author McCarty, Thomas R.
Garg, Rajat
Thompson, Christopher C.
Rustagi, Tarun
author_facet McCarty, Thomas R.
Garg, Rajat
Thompson, Christopher C.
Rustagi, Tarun
author_sort McCarty, Thomas R.
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel endoscopic procedure designed to facilitate sustained luminal patency in patients with gastric outlet obstruction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-GE for treatment of gastric outlet obstruction. Methods  Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were performed through April 2019. Patients with benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction were included. Measured outcomes included: immediate technical and clinical success as well as rate of serious adverse events (AEs). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran Q test and I (2) statistics. Publication bias was ascertained by funnel plot and Egger regression testing. Results  A total of five studies (n = 199 patients; 45.73 % male) were included in this study. Four retrospective studies and one prospective study were analyzed. Mean age of patients that underwent the EUS-GE procedure was 64.52 ± 1.37 years with a pooled mean follow-up period of 4.32 ± 1.65 months. In 21 % of patients (n = 43), gastric outlet obstruction was due to benign causes. Immediate technical success was 92.90 % (95 % CI; 88.26 – 95.79; I (2)  = 0.00 %) and reported in all studies. The clinical success rate of EUS-GE was 90.11 % (95 % CI; 84.64 – 93.44; I (2)  = 0.00 %). Serious AEs occurred in 5.61 % (95 % CI; 2.87 – 10.67; I (2)  = 1.67 %) of cases and were related to peritonitis, perforation, bleeding, and abdominal pain. Re-intervention rate was 11.43 % (95 % CI; 7.29 – 17.46; I (2)  = 17.38 %). Conclusions  EUS-GE appears to provide an effective and safe minimally invasive alternative for treatment of benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68113542019-11-01 Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis McCarty, Thomas R. Garg, Rajat Thompson, Christopher C. Rustagi, Tarun Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel endoscopic procedure designed to facilitate sustained luminal patency in patients with gastric outlet obstruction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-GE for treatment of gastric outlet obstruction. Methods  Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were performed through April 2019. Patients with benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction were included. Measured outcomes included: immediate technical and clinical success as well as rate of serious adverse events (AEs). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran Q test and I (2) statistics. Publication bias was ascertained by funnel plot and Egger regression testing. Results  A total of five studies (n = 199 patients; 45.73 % male) were included in this study. Four retrospective studies and one prospective study were analyzed. Mean age of patients that underwent the EUS-GE procedure was 64.52 ± 1.37 years with a pooled mean follow-up period of 4.32 ± 1.65 months. In 21 % of patients (n = 43), gastric outlet obstruction was due to benign causes. Immediate technical success was 92.90 % (95 % CI; 88.26 – 95.79; I (2)  = 0.00 %) and reported in all studies. The clinical success rate of EUS-GE was 90.11 % (95 % CI; 84.64 – 93.44; I (2)  = 0.00 %). Serious AEs occurred in 5.61 % (95 % CI; 2.87 – 10.67; I (2)  = 1.67 %) of cases and were related to peritonitis, perforation, bleeding, and abdominal pain. Re-intervention rate was 11.43 % (95 % CI; 7.29 – 17.46; I (2)  = 17.38 %). Conclusions  EUS-GE appears to provide an effective and safe minimally invasive alternative for treatment of benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-11 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811354/ /pubmed/31673620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8178 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle McCarty, Thomas R.
Garg, Rajat
Thompson, Christopher C.
Rustagi, Tarun
Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of eus-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0996-8178
work_keys_str_mv AT mccartythomasr efficacyandsafetyofeusguidedgastroenterostomyforbenignandmalignantgastricoutletobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gargrajat efficacyandsafetyofeusguidedgastroenterostomyforbenignandmalignantgastricoutletobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thompsonchristopherc efficacyandsafetyofeusguidedgastroenterostomyforbenignandmalignantgastricoutletobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rustagitarun efficacyandsafetyofeusguidedgastroenterostomyforbenignandmalignantgastricoutletobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis