Cargando…
A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up
AIM: SealBio is a novel technique which stimulates the periradicular cells to deposit a biological barrier at the root apex by inducing healing and regeneration. This clinical trial was undertaken to compare the outcome of teeth treated with the SealBio and the obturation technique. MATERIALS AND ME...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1616 |
_version_ | 1783462566584909824 |
---|---|
author | Jha, Preeti Virdi, Mandeep S Nain, Suman |
author_facet | Jha, Preeti Virdi, Mandeep S Nain, Suman |
author_sort | Jha, Preeti |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: SealBio is a novel technique which stimulates the periradicular cells to deposit a biological barrier at the root apex by inducing healing and regeneration. This clinical trial was undertaken to compare the outcome of teeth treated with the SealBio and the obturation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the SealBio and the obturation group. The time taken for both the techniques and periapical healing was evaluated. The patients of both the groups were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months follow up. The periapical index (PAI) was the primary outcome measure to check the apical bone density and healing. The secondary outcome measure was the presence/absence of signs and symptoms. The final outcome measure was the sum of the primary and secondary outcome measures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The time taken to perform endodontic treatment with the SealBio technique was significantly lesser than that of obturation. Both groups showed equally favorable outcomes at the end of 18 months without any statistically significant differences. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study have demonstrated that SealBio technique gives similar results as that of conventional gutta-percha obturation. The shortcomings of obturation such as difficulty in obtaining a fluid-tight seal and difficulty in obturating tortuous canals can be overcome by the SealBio method. The SealBio method is cost effective, less technique sensitive, and takes lesser chair time. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Jha P, Virdi MS, et al. A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(3):182–188. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6811939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68119392019-11-08 A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up Jha, Preeti Virdi, Mandeep S Nain, Suman Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM: SealBio is a novel technique which stimulates the periradicular cells to deposit a biological barrier at the root apex by inducing healing and regeneration. This clinical trial was undertaken to compare the outcome of teeth treated with the SealBio and the obturation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the SealBio and the obturation group. The time taken for both the techniques and periapical healing was evaluated. The patients of both the groups were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months follow up. The periapical index (PAI) was the primary outcome measure to check the apical bone density and healing. The secondary outcome measure was the presence/absence of signs and symptoms. The final outcome measure was the sum of the primary and secondary outcome measures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The time taken to perform endodontic treatment with the SealBio technique was significantly lesser than that of obturation. Both groups showed equally favorable outcomes at the end of 18 months without any statistically significant differences. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study have demonstrated that SealBio technique gives similar results as that of conventional gutta-percha obturation. The shortcomings of obturation such as difficulty in obtaining a fluid-tight seal and difficulty in obturating tortuous canals can be overcome by the SealBio method. The SealBio method is cost effective, less technique sensitive, and takes lesser chair time. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Jha P, Virdi MS, et al. A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(3):182–188. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6811939/ /pubmed/31708612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1616 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jha, Preeti Virdi, Mandeep S Nain, Suman A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up |
title | A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up |
title_full | A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up |
title_fullStr | A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up |
title_short | A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up |
title_sort | regenerative approach for root canal treatment of mature permanent teeth: comparative evaluation with 18 months follow-up |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jhapreeti aregenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup AT virdimandeeps aregenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup AT nainsuman aregenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup AT jhapreeti regenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup AT virdimandeeps regenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup AT nainsuman regenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup |