Cargando…

A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up

AIM: SealBio is a novel technique which stimulates the periradicular cells to deposit a biological barrier at the root apex by inducing healing and regeneration. This clinical trial was undertaken to compare the outcome of teeth treated with the SealBio and the obturation technique. MATERIALS AND ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jha, Preeti, Virdi, Mandeep S, Nain, Suman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708612
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1616
_version_ 1783462566584909824
author Jha, Preeti
Virdi, Mandeep S
Nain, Suman
author_facet Jha, Preeti
Virdi, Mandeep S
Nain, Suman
author_sort Jha, Preeti
collection PubMed
description AIM: SealBio is a novel technique which stimulates the periradicular cells to deposit a biological barrier at the root apex by inducing healing and regeneration. This clinical trial was undertaken to compare the outcome of teeth treated with the SealBio and the obturation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the SealBio and the obturation group. The time taken for both the techniques and periapical healing was evaluated. The patients of both the groups were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months follow up. The periapical index (PAI) was the primary outcome measure to check the apical bone density and healing. The secondary outcome measure was the presence/absence of signs and symptoms. The final outcome measure was the sum of the primary and secondary outcome measures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The time taken to perform endodontic treatment with the SealBio technique was significantly lesser than that of obturation. Both groups showed equally favorable outcomes at the end of 18 months without any statistically significant differences. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study have demonstrated that SealBio technique gives similar results as that of conventional gutta-percha obturation. The shortcomings of obturation such as difficulty in obtaining a fluid-tight seal and difficulty in obturating tortuous canals can be overcome by the SealBio method. The SealBio method is cost effective, less technique sensitive, and takes lesser chair time. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Jha P, Virdi MS, et al. A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(3):182–188.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68119392019-11-08 A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up Jha, Preeti Virdi, Mandeep S Nain, Suman Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM: SealBio is a novel technique which stimulates the periradicular cells to deposit a biological barrier at the root apex by inducing healing and regeneration. This clinical trial was undertaken to compare the outcome of teeth treated with the SealBio and the obturation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the SealBio and the obturation group. The time taken for both the techniques and periapical healing was evaluated. The patients of both the groups were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months follow up. The periapical index (PAI) was the primary outcome measure to check the apical bone density and healing. The secondary outcome measure was the presence/absence of signs and symptoms. The final outcome measure was the sum of the primary and secondary outcome measures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The time taken to perform endodontic treatment with the SealBio technique was significantly lesser than that of obturation. Both groups showed equally favorable outcomes at the end of 18 months without any statistically significant differences. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of the present study have demonstrated that SealBio technique gives similar results as that of conventional gutta-percha obturation. The shortcomings of obturation such as difficulty in obtaining a fluid-tight seal and difficulty in obturating tortuous canals can be overcome by the SealBio method. The SealBio method is cost effective, less technique sensitive, and takes lesser chair time. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Jha P, Virdi MS, et al. A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(3):182–188. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6811939/ /pubmed/31708612 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1616 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jha, Preeti
Virdi, Mandeep S
Nain, Suman
A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up
title A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up
title_full A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up
title_fullStr A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up
title_short A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up
title_sort regenerative approach for root canal treatment of mature permanent teeth: comparative evaluation with 18 months follow-up
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708612
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1616
work_keys_str_mv AT jhapreeti aregenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup
AT virdimandeeps aregenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup
AT nainsuman aregenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup
AT jhapreeti regenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup
AT virdimandeeps regenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup
AT nainsuman regenerativeapproachforrootcanaltreatmentofmaturepermanentteethcomparativeevaluationwith18monthsfollowup