Cargando…

ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK(®) SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES

BACKGROUND: In high-income countries, morbid obesity is a growing health problem that has already reached epidemic proportions. When performing a laparoscopic gastric bypass several operative methods exist. AIM: To describe the institutional experience using a knotless unidirectional barbed suture (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: BURES, Claudia, SEIKA, Philippa, DENECKE, Christian, PRATSCHKE, Johann, ZORRON, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6812141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31644672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020190001e1452
_version_ 1783462606380466176
author BURES, Claudia
SEIKA, Philippa
DENECKE, Christian
PRATSCHKE, Johann
ZORRON, Ricardo
author_facet BURES, Claudia
SEIKA, Philippa
DENECKE, Christian
PRATSCHKE, Johann
ZORRON, Ricardo
author_sort BURES, Claudia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In high-income countries, morbid obesity is a growing health problem that has already reached epidemic proportions. When performing a laparoscopic gastric bypass several operative methods exist. AIM: To describe the institutional experience using a knotless unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc 180/Covidien, Mansfield, MA) to create a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and jejunojejunostomy (JJ) during bariatric surgery. METHODS: Evaluation of a case series of 87 morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass with a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJA) and jejunojejunostomy (JJA) between 01/2015 and 06/2017. The patients were divided into two groups: in group I, GJA und JJA sutures were performed using the knotless unidirectional barbed suture; in group II, GJA and JJA were sutured with resorbable multifilament thread (Vicryl(®) 3/0 Ethicon, Livingstone, UK). The recorded data on gender, age, BMI, ASA score, operative time, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and reoperation, were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: All procedures were completed laparoscopically with no mortality. The mean operative time was 123.23 (±30.631) in group I and 127.57 (±42.772) in group II (p<0.05). The postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Early complications were observed for two patients (0.9%) in the barbed suture group and for one patient (0.42%) in the multifilament suture group (p<0.05). In group I two patients (0.9%) required reoperation: on the basis of jejunojejunal stenosis in one patient, and local abscess near the gastrojejunostomy, without a leakage, in the other. In group II one patient (0.42%) required reoperation due to stenosis of the GJA. The duration of hospital admission was similar for both groups: 3.36 (±0.743) days in group I vs. 3.38 (±1.058) days in group II (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The novel anastomotic technique is a safe and effective method and can be applied to gastrojejunal anastomosis and jejunojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6812141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68121412019-11-05 ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK(®) SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES BURES, Claudia SEIKA, Philippa DENECKE, Christian PRATSCHKE, Johann ZORRON, Ricardo Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article - Technique BACKGROUND: In high-income countries, morbid obesity is a growing health problem that has already reached epidemic proportions. When performing a laparoscopic gastric bypass several operative methods exist. AIM: To describe the institutional experience using a knotless unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc 180/Covidien, Mansfield, MA) to create a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and jejunojejunostomy (JJ) during bariatric surgery. METHODS: Evaluation of a case series of 87 morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass with a hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy (GJA) and jejunojejunostomy (JJA) between 01/2015 and 06/2017. The patients were divided into two groups: in group I, GJA und JJA sutures were performed using the knotless unidirectional barbed suture; in group II, GJA and JJA were sutured with resorbable multifilament thread (Vicryl(®) 3/0 Ethicon, Livingstone, UK). The recorded data on gender, age, BMI, ASA score, operative time, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and reoperation, were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: All procedures were completed laparoscopically with no mortality. The mean operative time was 123.23 (±30.631) in group I and 127.57 (±42.772) in group II (p<0.05). The postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Early complications were observed for two patients (0.9%) in the barbed suture group and for one patient (0.42%) in the multifilament suture group (p<0.05). In group I two patients (0.9%) required reoperation: on the basis of jejunojejunal stenosis in one patient, and local abscess near the gastrojejunostomy, without a leakage, in the other. In group II one patient (0.42%) required reoperation due to stenosis of the GJA. The duration of hospital admission was similar for both groups: 3.36 (±0.743) days in group I vs. 3.38 (±1.058) days in group II (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The novel anastomotic technique is a safe and effective method and can be applied to gastrojejunal anastomosis and jejunojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2019-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6812141/ /pubmed/31644672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020190001e1452 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article - Technique
BURES, Claudia
SEIKA, Philippa
DENECKE, Christian
PRATSCHKE, Johann
ZORRON, Ricardo
ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK(®) SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES
title ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK(®) SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES
title_full ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK(®) SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES
title_fullStr ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK(®) SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES
title_full_unstemmed ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK(®) SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES
title_short ROUTINE USE OF V-LOCK(®) SUTURE FOR BARIATRIC ANASTOMOSIS IS SAFE: COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM CONSECUTIVE CASE SERIES
title_sort routine use of v-lock(®) suture for bariatric anastomosis is safe: comparative results from consecutive case series
topic Original Article - Technique
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6812141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31644672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020190001e1452
work_keys_str_mv AT buresclaudia routineuseofvlocksutureforbariatricanastomosisissafecomparativeresultsfromconsecutivecaseseries
AT seikaphilippa routineuseofvlocksutureforbariatricanastomosisissafecomparativeresultsfromconsecutivecaseseries
AT deneckechristian routineuseofvlocksutureforbariatricanastomosisissafecomparativeresultsfromconsecutivecaseseries
AT pratschkejohann routineuseofvlocksutureforbariatricanastomosisissafecomparativeresultsfromconsecutivecaseseries
AT zorronricardo routineuseofvlocksutureforbariatricanastomosisissafecomparativeresultsfromconsecutivecaseseries