Cargando…
Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
BACKGROUND: To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment pla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5 |
_version_ | 1783462748849438720 |
---|---|
author | Sørbye, Øystein Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J. Eells, Tracy D. Amlo, Svein Hersoug, Anne Grete Haukvik, Unn K. Hartberg, Cecilie B. Høglend, Per Andreas Ulberg, Randi |
author_facet | Sørbye, Øystein Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J. Eells, Tracy D. Amlo, Svein Hersoug, Anne Grete Haukvik, Unn K. Hartberg, Cecilie B. Høglend, Per Andreas Ulberg, Randi |
author_sort | Sørbye, Øystein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment planning beyond each specific clinician-patient dyad, a case formulation must convey valid information concerning the patient, as well as being a reliable source of information regardless of the clinician’s theoretical orientation. The first aim of the present study is to explore the completeness of unstructured psychodynamic formulations, according to four components outlined in the Case Formulation Content Coding Method (CFCCM). The second aim is to estimate the reliability of independent formulations and their components, using similarity ratings of matched versus mismatched cases. METHODS: This study explores psychodynamic case formulations as made by two or more experienced clinicians after listening to an evaluation interview. The clinicians structured the formulations freely, with the sole constraint that technical, theory-laden terminology should be avoided. The formulations were decomposed into components after all formulations had been written. RESULTS: The results indicated that most formulations were adequately comprehensive, and that overall reliability of the formulations was high (> 0.70) for both experienced and inexperienced clinician raters, although the lower bound reliability estimate of the formulation component deemed most difficult to rate - inferred mechanisms - was marginal, 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: These results were achieved on case formulations made by experienced clinicians using simple experience-near language and minimizing technical concepts, which indicate a communicative quality in the formulations that make them clinically sound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: linicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462. 10.1007/s00432-018-2781-7., January 18, 2007. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6813052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68130522019-10-30 Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study Sørbye, Øystein Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J. Eells, Tracy D. Amlo, Svein Hersoug, Anne Grete Haukvik, Unn K. Hartberg, Cecilie B. Høglend, Per Andreas Ulberg, Randi BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment planning beyond each specific clinician-patient dyad, a case formulation must convey valid information concerning the patient, as well as being a reliable source of information regardless of the clinician’s theoretical orientation. The first aim of the present study is to explore the completeness of unstructured psychodynamic formulations, according to four components outlined in the Case Formulation Content Coding Method (CFCCM). The second aim is to estimate the reliability of independent formulations and their components, using similarity ratings of matched versus mismatched cases. METHODS: This study explores psychodynamic case formulations as made by two or more experienced clinicians after listening to an evaluation interview. The clinicians structured the formulations freely, with the sole constraint that technical, theory-laden terminology should be avoided. The formulations were decomposed into components after all formulations had been written. RESULTS: The results indicated that most formulations were adequately comprehensive, and that overall reliability of the formulations was high (> 0.70) for both experienced and inexperienced clinician raters, although the lower bound reliability estimate of the formulation component deemed most difficult to rate - inferred mechanisms - was marginal, 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: These results were achieved on case formulations made by experienced clinicians using simple experience-near language and minimizing technical concepts, which indicate a communicative quality in the formulations that make them clinically sound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: linicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462. 10.1007/s00432-018-2781-7., January 18, 2007. BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6813052/ /pubmed/31651367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sørbye, Øystein Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J. Eells, Tracy D. Amlo, Svein Hersoug, Anne Grete Haukvik, Unn K. Hartberg, Cecilie B. Høglend, Per Andreas Ulberg, Randi Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study |
title | Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study |
title_full | Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study |
title_fullStr | Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study |
title_short | Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study |
title_sort | psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sørbyeøystein psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy AT dahlhannesofiej psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy AT eellstracyd psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy AT amlosvein psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy AT hersougannegrete psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy AT haukvikunnk psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy AT hartbergcecilieb psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy AT høglendperandreas psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy AT ulbergrandi psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy |