Cargando…

Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study

BACKGROUND: To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sørbye, Øystein, Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J., Eells, Tracy D., Amlo, Svein, Hersoug, Anne Grete, Haukvik, Unn K., Hartberg, Cecilie B., Høglend, Per Andreas, Ulberg, Randi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5
_version_ 1783462748849438720
author Sørbye, Øystein
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J.
Eells, Tracy D.
Amlo, Svein
Hersoug, Anne Grete
Haukvik, Unn K.
Hartberg, Cecilie B.
Høglend, Per Andreas
Ulberg, Randi
author_facet Sørbye, Øystein
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J.
Eells, Tracy D.
Amlo, Svein
Hersoug, Anne Grete
Haukvik, Unn K.
Hartberg, Cecilie B.
Høglend, Per Andreas
Ulberg, Randi
author_sort Sørbye, Øystein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment planning beyond each specific clinician-patient dyad, a case formulation must convey valid information concerning the patient, as well as being a reliable source of information regardless of the clinician’s theoretical orientation. The first aim of the present study is to explore the completeness of unstructured psychodynamic formulations, according to four components outlined in the Case Formulation Content Coding Method (CFCCM). The second aim is to estimate the reliability of independent formulations and their components, using similarity ratings of matched versus mismatched cases. METHODS: This study explores psychodynamic case formulations as made by two or more experienced clinicians after listening to an evaluation interview. The clinicians structured the formulations freely, with the sole constraint that technical, theory-laden terminology should be avoided. The formulations were decomposed into components after all formulations had been written. RESULTS: The results indicated that most formulations were adequately comprehensive, and that overall reliability of the formulations was high (> 0.70) for both experienced and inexperienced clinician raters, although the lower bound reliability estimate of the formulation component deemed most difficult to rate - inferred mechanisms - was marginal, 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: These results were achieved on case formulations made by experienced clinicians using simple experience-near language and minimizing technical concepts, which indicate a communicative quality in the formulations that make them clinically sound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: linicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462. 10.1007/s00432-018-2781-7., January 18, 2007.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6813052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68130522019-10-30 Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study Sørbye, Øystein Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J. Eells, Tracy D. Amlo, Svein Hersoug, Anne Grete Haukvik, Unn K. Hartberg, Cecilie B. Høglend, Per Andreas Ulberg, Randi BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment planning beyond each specific clinician-patient dyad, a case formulation must convey valid information concerning the patient, as well as being a reliable source of information regardless of the clinician’s theoretical orientation. The first aim of the present study is to explore the completeness of unstructured psychodynamic formulations, according to four components outlined in the Case Formulation Content Coding Method (CFCCM). The second aim is to estimate the reliability of independent formulations and their components, using similarity ratings of matched versus mismatched cases. METHODS: This study explores psychodynamic case formulations as made by two or more experienced clinicians after listening to an evaluation interview. The clinicians structured the formulations freely, with the sole constraint that technical, theory-laden terminology should be avoided. The formulations were decomposed into components after all formulations had been written. RESULTS: The results indicated that most formulations were adequately comprehensive, and that overall reliability of the formulations was high (> 0.70) for both experienced and inexperienced clinician raters, although the lower bound reliability estimate of the formulation component deemed most difficult to rate - inferred mechanisms - was marginal, 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: These results were achieved on case formulations made by experienced clinicians using simple experience-near language and minimizing technical concepts, which indicate a communicative quality in the formulations that make them clinically sound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: linicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462. 10.1007/s00432-018-2781-7., January 18, 2007. BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6813052/ /pubmed/31651367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sørbye, Øystein
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J.
Eells, Tracy D.
Amlo, Svein
Hersoug, Anne Grete
Haukvik, Unn K.
Hartberg, Cecilie B.
Høglend, Per Andreas
Ulberg, Randi
Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
title Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
title_full Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
title_fullStr Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
title_full_unstemmed Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
title_short Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
title_sort psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sørbyeøystein psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy
AT dahlhannesofiej psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy
AT eellstracyd psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy
AT amlosvein psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy
AT hersougannegrete psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy
AT haukvikunnk psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy
AT hartbergcecilieb psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy
AT høglendperandreas psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy
AT ulbergrandi psychodynamiccaseformulationswithouttechnicallanguageareliabilitystudy