Cargando…

A Two-DNA Methylation Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE: Effective biomarkers and models are needed to improve the prognostic prospects of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The purpose of this work was to identify DNA methylation biomarkers and to evaluate the utility of DNA methylation analysis for ccRCC prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Shanping, Ye, Shazhou, Wu, Xiaoyue, Xu, Mingjun, Zhuo, Renjie, Liao, Qi, Xi, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1013
_version_ 1783462772841906176
author Shi, Shanping
Ye, Shazhou
Wu, Xiaoyue
Xu, Mingjun
Zhuo, Renjie
Liao, Qi
Xi, Yang
author_facet Shi, Shanping
Ye, Shazhou
Wu, Xiaoyue
Xu, Mingjun
Zhuo, Renjie
Liao, Qi
Xi, Yang
author_sort Shi, Shanping
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Effective biomarkers and models are needed to improve the prognostic prospects of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The purpose of this work was to identify DNA methylation biomarkers and to evaluate the utility of DNA methylation analysis for ccRCC prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An overview of genome-wide methylation of ccRCC tissues derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was download for analysis. DNA methylation signatures were identified using Cox regression methods. The potential clinical significance of methylation biomarkers acting as a novel prognostic markers was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: This study analyzed data for 215 patients with information on 23171 DNA methylation sites and identified a two-DNA methylation signature (cg18034859, cg24199834) with the help of a step-wise multivariable Cox regression model. The area under the curve of ROCs for the two-DNA methylation signature was 0.819. The study samples were stratified into low- and high-risk classifications based on an optimal threshold, and the two groups showed markedly different survival rates. Moreover, the two-DNA methylation marker was suitable for patients of varying ages, sex, stages (I and IV), and histologic grade (G2). CONCLUSION: The two-DNA methylation signature was deemed to be a potential novel prognostic biomarker of use in increasing the accuracy of predicting overall survival of ccRCC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6813151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68131512019-11-01 A Two-DNA Methylation Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Shi, Shanping Ye, Shazhou Wu, Xiaoyue Xu, Mingjun Zhuo, Renjie Liao, Qi Xi, Yang Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Effective biomarkers and models are needed to improve the prognostic prospects of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The purpose of this work was to identify DNA methylation biomarkers and to evaluate the utility of DNA methylation analysis for ccRCC prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An overview of genome-wide methylation of ccRCC tissues derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was download for analysis. DNA methylation signatures were identified using Cox regression methods. The potential clinical significance of methylation biomarkers acting as a novel prognostic markers was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: This study analyzed data for 215 patients with information on 23171 DNA methylation sites and identified a two-DNA methylation signature (cg18034859, cg24199834) with the help of a step-wise multivariable Cox regression model. The area under the curve of ROCs for the two-DNA methylation signature was 0.819. The study samples were stratified into low- and high-risk classifications based on an optimal threshold, and the two groups showed markedly different survival rates. Moreover, the two-DNA methylation marker was suitable for patients of varying ages, sex, stages (I and IV), and histologic grade (G2). CONCLUSION: The two-DNA methylation signature was deemed to be a potential novel prognostic biomarker of use in increasing the accuracy of predicting overall survival of ccRCC patients. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2019-11-01 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6813151/ /pubmed/31637882 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1013 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shi, Shanping
Ye, Shazhou
Wu, Xiaoyue
Xu, Mingjun
Zhuo, Renjie
Liao, Qi
Xi, Yang
A Two-DNA Methylation Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
title A Two-DNA Methylation Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_full A Two-DNA Methylation Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr A Two-DNA Methylation Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A Two-DNA Methylation Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_short A Two-DNA Methylation Signature to Improve Prognosis Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
title_sort two-dna methylation signature to improve prognosis prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1013
work_keys_str_mv AT shishanping atwodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT yeshazhou atwodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT wuxiaoyue atwodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT xumingjun atwodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT zhuorenjie atwodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT liaoqi atwodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT xiyang atwodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT shishanping twodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT yeshazhou twodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT wuxiaoyue twodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT xumingjun twodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT zhuorenjie twodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT liaoqi twodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT xiyang twodnamethylationsignaturetoimproveprognosispredictionofclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma