Cargando…

Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice

BACKGROUND: An ethics reflection group (ERG) is one of a number of ethics support services developed to better handle ethical challenges in healthcare. The aim of this article is to evaluate the significance of ERGs in psychiatric and general hospital departments in Denmark. METHODS: This is a quali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruun, H., Huniche, L., Stenager, E., Mogensen, C. B., Pedersen, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0415-5
_version_ 1783462934058369024
author Bruun, H.
Huniche, L.
Stenager, E.
Mogensen, C. B.
Pedersen, R.
author_facet Bruun, H.
Huniche, L.
Stenager, E.
Mogensen, C. B.
Pedersen, R.
author_sort Bruun, H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An ethics reflection group (ERG) is one of a number of ethics support services developed to better handle ethical challenges in healthcare. The aim of this article is to evaluate the significance of ERGs in psychiatric and general hospital departments in Denmark. METHODS: This is a qualitative action research study, including systematic text condensation of 28 individual interviews and 4 focus groups with clinicians, ethics facilitators and ward managers. Short written descriptions of the ethical challenges presented in the ERGs also informed the analysis of significance. RESULTS: A recurring ethical challenge for clinicians, in a total of 63 cases described and assessed in 3 ethical reflection groups, is to strike a balance between respect for patient autonomy, paternalistic responsibility, professional responsibilities and institutional values. Both in psychiatric and general hospital departments, the study participants report a positive impact of ERG, which can be divided into three categories: 1) Significance for patients, 2) Significance for clinicians, and 3) Significance for ward managers. In wards characterized by short-time patient admissions, the cases assessed were retrospective and the beneficiaries of improved dialogue mainly future patients rather than the patients discussed in the specific ethical challenge presented. In wards with longer admissions, the patients concerned also benefitted from the dialogue in the ERG. CONCLUSION: This study indicates a positive significance and impact of ERGs; constituting an interdisciplinary learning resource for clinicians, creating significance for themselves, the ward managers and the organization. By introducing specific examples, this study indicates that ERGs have significance for the patients discussed in the specific ethical challenge, but mostly indirectly through learning among clinicians and development of clinical practice. More research is needed to further investigate the impact of ERGs seen from the perspectives of patients and relatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6813973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68139732019-10-30 Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice Bruun, H. Huniche, L. Stenager, E. Mogensen, C. B. Pedersen, R. BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: An ethics reflection group (ERG) is one of a number of ethics support services developed to better handle ethical challenges in healthcare. The aim of this article is to evaluate the significance of ERGs in psychiatric and general hospital departments in Denmark. METHODS: This is a qualitative action research study, including systematic text condensation of 28 individual interviews and 4 focus groups with clinicians, ethics facilitators and ward managers. Short written descriptions of the ethical challenges presented in the ERGs also informed the analysis of significance. RESULTS: A recurring ethical challenge for clinicians, in a total of 63 cases described and assessed in 3 ethical reflection groups, is to strike a balance between respect for patient autonomy, paternalistic responsibility, professional responsibilities and institutional values. Both in psychiatric and general hospital departments, the study participants report a positive impact of ERG, which can be divided into three categories: 1) Significance for patients, 2) Significance for clinicians, and 3) Significance for ward managers. In wards characterized by short-time patient admissions, the cases assessed were retrospective and the beneficiaries of improved dialogue mainly future patients rather than the patients discussed in the specific ethical challenge presented. In wards with longer admissions, the patients concerned also benefitted from the dialogue in the ERG. CONCLUSION: This study indicates a positive significance and impact of ERGs; constituting an interdisciplinary learning resource for clinicians, creating significance for themselves, the ward managers and the organization. By introducing specific examples, this study indicates that ERGs have significance for the patients discussed in the specific ethical challenge, but mostly indirectly through learning among clinicians and development of clinical practice. More research is needed to further investigate the impact of ERGs seen from the perspectives of patients and relatives. BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6813973/ /pubmed/31651308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0415-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bruun, H.
Huniche, L.
Stenager, E.
Mogensen, C. B.
Pedersen, R.
Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice
title Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice
title_full Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice
title_fullStr Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice
title_short Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice
title_sort hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6813973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0415-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bruunh hospitalethicsreflectiongroupsalearninganddevelopmentresourceforclinicalpractice
AT hunichel hospitalethicsreflectiongroupsalearninganddevelopmentresourceforclinicalpractice
AT stenagere hospitalethicsreflectiongroupsalearninganddevelopmentresourceforclinicalpractice
AT mogensencb hospitalethicsreflectiongroupsalearninganddevelopmentresourceforclinicalpractice
AT pedersenr hospitalethicsreflectiongroupsalearninganddevelopmentresourceforclinicalpractice