Cargando…

Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation

BACKGROUND: In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation session...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vieira, Bruno, Demirtas, Derya, B. van de Kamer, Jeroen, Hans, Erwin W., van Harten, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0
_version_ 1783462960451026944
author Vieira, Bruno
Demirtas, Derya
B. van de Kamer, Jeroen
Hans, Erwin W.
van Harten, Wim
author_facet Vieira, Bruno
Demirtas, Derya
B. van de Kamer, Jeroen
Hans, Erwin W.
van Harten, Wim
author_sort Vieira, Bruno
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation session, which is usually set right after consultation (pull strategy) or can alternatively be set after the pre-treatment workflow has been completed (push strategy). The objective of this study is to assess the impact of using pull and push strategies and explore alternative interventions for improving timeliness in radiotherapy. METHODS: Discrete-event simulation is used to model the patient flow of a large radiotherapy department of a Dutch hospital. A staff survey, interviews with managers, and historical data from 2017 are used to generate model inputs, in which fluctuations in patient inflow and resource availability are considered. RESULTS: A hybrid (40% pull / 60% push) strategy representing the current practice (baseline case) leads to 12% lower average waiting times and 48% fewer first appointment rebooks when compared to a full pull strategy, which in turn leads to 41% fewer patients breaching the waiting time targets. An additional scenario analysis performed on the baseline case showed that spreading consultation slots evenly throughout the week can provide a 21% reduction in waiting times. CONCLUSIONS: A 100% pull strategy allows for more patients starting treatment within the waiting time targets than a hybrid strategy, in spite of slightly longer waiting times and more first appointment rebooks. Our algorithm can be used by radiotherapy policy makers to identify the optimal balance between push and pull strategies to ensure timely treatments while providing patient-centered care adapted to their specific conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6814107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68141072019-10-31 Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation Vieira, Bruno Demirtas, Derya B. van de Kamer, Jeroen Hans, Erwin W. van Harten, Wim BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation session, which is usually set right after consultation (pull strategy) or can alternatively be set after the pre-treatment workflow has been completed (push strategy). The objective of this study is to assess the impact of using pull and push strategies and explore alternative interventions for improving timeliness in radiotherapy. METHODS: Discrete-event simulation is used to model the patient flow of a large radiotherapy department of a Dutch hospital. A staff survey, interviews with managers, and historical data from 2017 are used to generate model inputs, in which fluctuations in patient inflow and resource availability are considered. RESULTS: A hybrid (40% pull / 60% push) strategy representing the current practice (baseline case) leads to 12% lower average waiting times and 48% fewer first appointment rebooks when compared to a full pull strategy, which in turn leads to 41% fewer patients breaching the waiting time targets. An additional scenario analysis performed on the baseline case showed that spreading consultation slots evenly throughout the week can provide a 21% reduction in waiting times. CONCLUSIONS: A 100% pull strategy allows for more patients starting treatment within the waiting time targets than a hybrid strategy, in spite of slightly longer waiting times and more first appointment rebooks. Our algorithm can be used by radiotherapy policy makers to identify the optimal balance between push and pull strategies to ensure timely treatments while providing patient-centered care adapted to their specific conditions. BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6814107/ /pubmed/31651304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vieira, Bruno
Demirtas, Derya
B. van de Kamer, Jeroen
Hans, Erwin W.
van Harten, Wim
Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_full Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_fullStr Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_full_unstemmed Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_short Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
title_sort improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vieirabruno improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation
AT demirtasderya improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation
AT bvandekamerjeroen improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation
AT hanserwinw improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation
AT vanhartenwim improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation