Cargando…
Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation
BACKGROUND: In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation session...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0 |
_version_ | 1783462960451026944 |
---|---|
author | Vieira, Bruno Demirtas, Derya B. van de Kamer, Jeroen Hans, Erwin W. van Harten, Wim |
author_facet | Vieira, Bruno Demirtas, Derya B. van de Kamer, Jeroen Hans, Erwin W. van Harten, Wim |
author_sort | Vieira, Bruno |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation session, which is usually set right after consultation (pull strategy) or can alternatively be set after the pre-treatment workflow has been completed (push strategy). The objective of this study is to assess the impact of using pull and push strategies and explore alternative interventions for improving timeliness in radiotherapy. METHODS: Discrete-event simulation is used to model the patient flow of a large radiotherapy department of a Dutch hospital. A staff survey, interviews with managers, and historical data from 2017 are used to generate model inputs, in which fluctuations in patient inflow and resource availability are considered. RESULTS: A hybrid (40% pull / 60% push) strategy representing the current practice (baseline case) leads to 12% lower average waiting times and 48% fewer first appointment rebooks when compared to a full pull strategy, which in turn leads to 41% fewer patients breaching the waiting time targets. An additional scenario analysis performed on the baseline case showed that spreading consultation slots evenly throughout the week can provide a 21% reduction in waiting times. CONCLUSIONS: A 100% pull strategy allows for more patients starting treatment within the waiting time targets than a hybrid strategy, in spite of slightly longer waiting times and more first appointment rebooks. Our algorithm can be used by radiotherapy policy makers to identify the optimal balance between push and pull strategies to ensure timely treatments while providing patient-centered care adapted to their specific conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6814107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68141072019-10-31 Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation Vieira, Bruno Demirtas, Derya B. van de Kamer, Jeroen Hans, Erwin W. van Harten, Wim BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: In radiotherapy, minimizing the time between referral and start of treatment (waiting time) is important to possibly mitigate tumor growth and avoid psychological distress in cancer patients. Radiotherapy pre-treatment workflow is driven by the scheduling of the first irradiation session, which is usually set right after consultation (pull strategy) or can alternatively be set after the pre-treatment workflow has been completed (push strategy). The objective of this study is to assess the impact of using pull and push strategies and explore alternative interventions for improving timeliness in radiotherapy. METHODS: Discrete-event simulation is used to model the patient flow of a large radiotherapy department of a Dutch hospital. A staff survey, interviews with managers, and historical data from 2017 are used to generate model inputs, in which fluctuations in patient inflow and resource availability are considered. RESULTS: A hybrid (40% pull / 60% push) strategy representing the current practice (baseline case) leads to 12% lower average waiting times and 48% fewer first appointment rebooks when compared to a full pull strategy, which in turn leads to 41% fewer patients breaching the waiting time targets. An additional scenario analysis performed on the baseline case showed that spreading consultation slots evenly throughout the week can provide a 21% reduction in waiting times. CONCLUSIONS: A 100% pull strategy allows for more patients starting treatment within the waiting time targets than a hybrid strategy, in spite of slightly longer waiting times and more first appointment rebooks. Our algorithm can be used by radiotherapy policy makers to identify the optimal balance between push and pull strategies to ensure timely treatments while providing patient-centered care adapted to their specific conditions. BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6814107/ /pubmed/31651304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vieira, Bruno Demirtas, Derya B. van de Kamer, Jeroen Hans, Erwin W. van Harten, Wim Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation |
title | Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation |
title_full | Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation |
title_fullStr | Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation |
title_short | Improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation |
title_sort | improving workflow control in radiotherapy using discrete-event simulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0910-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieirabruno improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation AT demirtasderya improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation AT bvandekamerjeroen improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation AT hanserwinw improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation AT vanhartenwim improvingworkflowcontrolinradiotherapyusingdiscreteeventsimulation |