Cargando…
Surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter
BACKGROUND: The number of patients with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers has tended to increase. However, no clear consensus on the optimum treatment policy has yet been reached. METHODS: This study included patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of Sievert type II in whom resection was perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0614-5 |
_version_ | 1783462963449954304 |
---|---|
author | Hoshino, Isamu Gunji, Hisashi Ishige, Fumitaka Iwatate, Yosuke Takiguchi, Nobuhiro Ikeda, Atsushi Soda, Hiroaki Tonooka, Toru Sato, Nami Kawahara, Kenji Nabeya, Yoshihiro |
author_facet | Hoshino, Isamu Gunji, Hisashi Ishige, Fumitaka Iwatate, Yosuke Takiguchi, Nobuhiro Ikeda, Atsushi Soda, Hiroaki Tonooka, Toru Sato, Nami Kawahara, Kenji Nabeya, Yoshihiro |
author_sort | Hoshino, Isamu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The number of patients with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers has tended to increase. However, no clear consensus on the optimum treatment policy has yet been reached. METHODS: This study included patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of Sievert type II in whom resection was performed in our hospital. We performed a clinicopathological examination, and patients were divided into two groups by the tumor size: L group, tumor size ≥4 cm; and S group, tumor size < 4 cm. The clinical factors, such as nodal dissection and recurrence pattern, were then analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were diagnosed with ECJ cancers. The average tumor size was 55.1 mm, and 32 cases (66.7%) had tumors ≥4 cm. Metastasis to the mediastinum was noted in 4 cases (12.5%) in the L group but none in the S group. Recurrence in the upper or middle mediastinum lymph nodes was noted in 3 cases (9.4%) in the L group. The 5-year overall survival rates were 49.7 and 83.9% in the L and S groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As the tumor grows large, it is difficult to accurately judge EGJ on the image, and as a result it is difficult to understand the exact esophageal invasion distance of the tumor. Therefore, lymph node dissection including the upper mediastinum is considered vital, regardless of the degree of esophageal invasion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6814119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68141192019-10-31 Surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter Hoshino, Isamu Gunji, Hisashi Ishige, Fumitaka Iwatate, Yosuke Takiguchi, Nobuhiro Ikeda, Atsushi Soda, Hiroaki Tonooka, Toru Sato, Nami Kawahara, Kenji Nabeya, Yoshihiro BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The number of patients with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers has tended to increase. However, no clear consensus on the optimum treatment policy has yet been reached. METHODS: This study included patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of Sievert type II in whom resection was performed in our hospital. We performed a clinicopathological examination, and patients were divided into two groups by the tumor size: L group, tumor size ≥4 cm; and S group, tumor size < 4 cm. The clinical factors, such as nodal dissection and recurrence pattern, were then analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were diagnosed with ECJ cancers. The average tumor size was 55.1 mm, and 32 cases (66.7%) had tumors ≥4 cm. Metastasis to the mediastinum was noted in 4 cases (12.5%) in the L group but none in the S group. Recurrence in the upper or middle mediastinum lymph nodes was noted in 3 cases (9.4%) in the L group. The 5-year overall survival rates were 49.7 and 83.9% in the L and S groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As the tumor grows large, it is difficult to accurately judge EGJ on the image, and as a result it is difficult to understand the exact esophageal invasion distance of the tumor. Therefore, lymph node dissection including the upper mediastinum is considered vital, regardless of the degree of esophageal invasion. BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6814119/ /pubmed/31651313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0614-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hoshino, Isamu Gunji, Hisashi Ishige, Fumitaka Iwatate, Yosuke Takiguchi, Nobuhiro Ikeda, Atsushi Soda, Hiroaki Tonooka, Toru Sato, Nami Kawahara, Kenji Nabeya, Yoshihiro Surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter |
title | Surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter |
title_full | Surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter |
title_fullStr | Surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter |
title_short | Surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter |
title_sort | surgical treatment strategy for esophagogastric junction cancers based on the tumor diameter |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0614-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoshinoisamu surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT gunjihisashi surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT ishigefumitaka surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT iwatateyosuke surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT takiguchinobuhiro surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT ikedaatsushi surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT sodahiroaki surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT tonookatoru surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT satonami surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT kawaharakenji surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter AT nabeyayoshihiro surgicaltreatmentstrategyforesophagogastricjunctioncancersbasedonthetumordiameter |