Cargando…
Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: An estimated 8.2 million adults in the United States live with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Although the benefits of integrated treatment services for persons with co-occurring disorders has been well-established, gaps in access to integrated care persist. Impl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4624-x |
_version_ | 1783462964154597376 |
---|---|
author | Assefa, Mehret T. Ford, James H. Osborne, Eric McIlvaine, Amy King, Ahney Campbell, Kevin Jo, Booil McGovern, Mark P. |
author_facet | Assefa, Mehret T. Ford, James H. Osborne, Eric McIlvaine, Amy King, Ahney Campbell, Kevin Jo, Booil McGovern, Mark P. |
author_sort | Assefa, Mehret T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An estimated 8.2 million adults in the United States live with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Although the benefits of integrated treatment services for persons with co-occurring disorders has been well-established, gaps in access to integrated care persist. Implementation research can address this gap. We evaluated if the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) implementation strategy was effective in increasing integrated services capacity among organizations treating persons with co-occurring disorders. METHODS: This study employed a cluster randomized waitlist control group design. Forty-nine addiction treatment organizations from the State of Washington were randomized into one of two study arms: (1) NIATx strategy (active implementation strategy), or (2) waitlist (control). The primary outcome was a standardized organizational measure of integrated service capability: the Dual Diagnosis in Addiction Treatment (DDCAT) Index. Intent-to-treat analyses and per-protocol analyses were conducted to address the following questions: (1) Is NIATx effective in increasing integrated service capacity? and (2) Are there differences in organizations that actually use NIATx per-protocol versus those that do not? RESULTS: From baseline to one-year post active implementation, both the NIATx strategy and waitlist arms demonstrated improvements over time in DDCAT Index total and DDCAT dimension scores. In intent-to-treat analyses, a moderate but statistically significant difference in improvement between study arms was seen only in the Program Milieu dimension (p = 0.020, Cohen’s d = 0.54). In per-protocol analyses, moderate-to-large effects in Program Milieu (p = 0.002, Cohen’s d = 0.91) and Continuity of Care (p = 0.026, Cohen’s d = 0.63) dimensions, and in total DDCAT Index (p = 0.046, Cohen’s d = 0.51) were found. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, organizations in both study arms improved DDCAT Index scores over time. Organizations in the NIATx strategy arm with full adherence to the NIATx protocol had significantly greater improvements in the primary outcome measure of integrated service capacity for persons with co-occurring disorders. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03007940. Retrospectively registered January 2017 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6814122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68141222019-10-31 Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial Assefa, Mehret T. Ford, James H. Osborne, Eric McIlvaine, Amy King, Ahney Campbell, Kevin Jo, Booil McGovern, Mark P. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: An estimated 8.2 million adults in the United States live with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Although the benefits of integrated treatment services for persons with co-occurring disorders has been well-established, gaps in access to integrated care persist. Implementation research can address this gap. We evaluated if the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) implementation strategy was effective in increasing integrated services capacity among organizations treating persons with co-occurring disorders. METHODS: This study employed a cluster randomized waitlist control group design. Forty-nine addiction treatment organizations from the State of Washington were randomized into one of two study arms: (1) NIATx strategy (active implementation strategy), or (2) waitlist (control). The primary outcome was a standardized organizational measure of integrated service capability: the Dual Diagnosis in Addiction Treatment (DDCAT) Index. Intent-to-treat analyses and per-protocol analyses were conducted to address the following questions: (1) Is NIATx effective in increasing integrated service capacity? and (2) Are there differences in organizations that actually use NIATx per-protocol versus those that do not? RESULTS: From baseline to one-year post active implementation, both the NIATx strategy and waitlist arms demonstrated improvements over time in DDCAT Index total and DDCAT dimension scores. In intent-to-treat analyses, a moderate but statistically significant difference in improvement between study arms was seen only in the Program Milieu dimension (p = 0.020, Cohen’s d = 0.54). In per-protocol analyses, moderate-to-large effects in Program Milieu (p = 0.002, Cohen’s d = 0.91) and Continuity of Care (p = 0.026, Cohen’s d = 0.63) dimensions, and in total DDCAT Index (p = 0.046, Cohen’s d = 0.51) were found. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, organizations in both study arms improved DDCAT Index scores over time. Organizations in the NIATx strategy arm with full adherence to the NIATx protocol had significantly greater improvements in the primary outcome measure of integrated service capacity for persons with co-occurring disorders. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03007940. Retrospectively registered January 2017 BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6814122/ /pubmed/31651302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4624-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Assefa, Mehret T. Ford, James H. Osborne, Eric McIlvaine, Amy King, Ahney Campbell, Kevin Jo, Booil McGovern, Mark P. Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title | Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4624-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assefamehrett implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fordjamesh implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT osborneeric implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcilvaineamy implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kingahney implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT campbellkevin implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jobooil implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcgovernmarkp implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |