Cargando…

Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: An estimated 8.2 million adults in the United States live with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Although the benefits of integrated treatment services for persons with co-occurring disorders has been well-established, gaps in access to integrated care persist. Impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assefa, Mehret T., Ford, James H., Osborne, Eric, McIlvaine, Amy, King, Ahney, Campbell, Kevin, Jo, Booil, McGovern, Mark P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4624-x
_version_ 1783462964154597376
author Assefa, Mehret T.
Ford, James H.
Osborne, Eric
McIlvaine, Amy
King, Ahney
Campbell, Kevin
Jo, Booil
McGovern, Mark P.
author_facet Assefa, Mehret T.
Ford, James H.
Osborne, Eric
McIlvaine, Amy
King, Ahney
Campbell, Kevin
Jo, Booil
McGovern, Mark P.
author_sort Assefa, Mehret T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An estimated 8.2 million adults in the United States live with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Although the benefits of integrated treatment services for persons with co-occurring disorders has been well-established, gaps in access to integrated care persist. Implementation research can address this gap. We evaluated if the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) implementation strategy was effective in increasing integrated services capacity among organizations treating persons with co-occurring disorders. METHODS: This study employed a cluster randomized waitlist control group design. Forty-nine addiction treatment organizations from the State of Washington were randomized into one of two study arms: (1) NIATx strategy (active implementation strategy), or (2) waitlist (control). The primary outcome was a standardized organizational measure of integrated service capability: the Dual Diagnosis in Addiction Treatment (DDCAT) Index. Intent-to-treat analyses and per-protocol analyses were conducted to address the following questions: (1) Is NIATx effective in increasing integrated service capacity? and (2) Are there differences in organizations that actually use NIATx per-protocol versus those that do not? RESULTS: From baseline to one-year post active implementation, both the NIATx strategy and waitlist arms demonstrated improvements over time in DDCAT Index total and DDCAT dimension scores. In intent-to-treat analyses, a moderate but statistically significant difference in improvement between study arms was seen only in the Program Milieu dimension (p = 0.020, Cohen’s d = 0.54). In per-protocol analyses, moderate-to-large effects in Program Milieu (p = 0.002, Cohen’s d = 0.91) and Continuity of Care (p = 0.026, Cohen’s d = 0.63) dimensions, and in total DDCAT Index (p = 0.046, Cohen’s d = 0.51) were found. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, organizations in both study arms improved DDCAT Index scores over time. Organizations in the NIATx strategy arm with full adherence to the NIATx protocol had significantly greater improvements in the primary outcome measure of integrated service capacity for persons with co-occurring disorders. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03007940. Retrospectively registered January 2017
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6814122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68141222019-10-31 Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial Assefa, Mehret T. Ford, James H. Osborne, Eric McIlvaine, Amy King, Ahney Campbell, Kevin Jo, Booil McGovern, Mark P. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: An estimated 8.2 million adults in the United States live with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Although the benefits of integrated treatment services for persons with co-occurring disorders has been well-established, gaps in access to integrated care persist. Implementation research can address this gap. We evaluated if the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) implementation strategy was effective in increasing integrated services capacity among organizations treating persons with co-occurring disorders. METHODS: This study employed a cluster randomized waitlist control group design. Forty-nine addiction treatment organizations from the State of Washington were randomized into one of two study arms: (1) NIATx strategy (active implementation strategy), or (2) waitlist (control). The primary outcome was a standardized organizational measure of integrated service capability: the Dual Diagnosis in Addiction Treatment (DDCAT) Index. Intent-to-treat analyses and per-protocol analyses were conducted to address the following questions: (1) Is NIATx effective in increasing integrated service capacity? and (2) Are there differences in organizations that actually use NIATx per-protocol versus those that do not? RESULTS: From baseline to one-year post active implementation, both the NIATx strategy and waitlist arms demonstrated improvements over time in DDCAT Index total and DDCAT dimension scores. In intent-to-treat analyses, a moderate but statistically significant difference in improvement between study arms was seen only in the Program Milieu dimension (p = 0.020, Cohen’s d = 0.54). In per-protocol analyses, moderate-to-large effects in Program Milieu (p = 0.002, Cohen’s d = 0.91) and Continuity of Care (p = 0.026, Cohen’s d = 0.63) dimensions, and in total DDCAT Index (p = 0.046, Cohen’s d = 0.51) were found. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, organizations in both study arms improved DDCAT Index scores over time. Organizations in the NIATx strategy arm with full adherence to the NIATx protocol had significantly greater improvements in the primary outcome measure of integrated service capacity for persons with co-occurring disorders. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03007940. Retrospectively registered January 2017 BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6814122/ /pubmed/31651302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4624-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Assefa, Mehret T.
Ford, James H.
Osborne, Eric
McIlvaine, Amy
King, Ahney
Campbell, Kevin
Jo, Booil
McGovern, Mark P.
Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
title Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short Implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort implementing integrated services in routine behavioral health care: primary outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4624-x
work_keys_str_mv AT assefamehrett implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fordjamesh implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT osborneeric implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcilvaineamy implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kingahney implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellkevin implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jobooil implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgovernmarkp implementingintegratedservicesinroutinebehavioralhealthcareprimaryoutcomesfromaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial