Cargando…

Telemonitoring in diabetes: evolution of concepts and technologies, with a focus on results of the more recent studies

This is a narrative review of telemonitoring (remote monitoring) projects and studies within the field of diabetes, with a focus on results of the more recent studies. Since the beginning of the 1990s, several telemedicine projects and studies focused on type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Over the last 5 y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrès, Emmanuel, Meyer, Laurent, Zulfiqar, Abrar-Ahmad, Hajjam, Mohamed, Talha, Samy, Bahougne, Thibault, Ervé, Sylvie, Hajjam, Jawad, Doucet, Jean, Jeandidier, Nathalie, Hajjam El Hassani, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Carol Davila University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31666818
http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2019-0006
Descripción
Sumario:This is a narrative review of telemonitoring (remote monitoring) projects and studies within the field of diabetes, with a focus on results of the more recent studies. Since the beginning of the 1990s, several telemedicine projects and studies focused on type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Over the last 5 years, numerous telemedicine projects based on connected objects and new information and communication technologies (ICT) (elements defining telemedicine 2.0) have emerged or are still under development. Two examples are the DIABETe and Telesage telemonitoring project which perfectly fits within the telemedicine 2.0 framework – the first to include artificial intelligence (AI) with MyPredi(TM) and Diabeo(TM). Mainly, these projects and studies show that telemonitoring diabetic result in: improvements in control of blood glucose (BG) level and significant reduction in HbA1c (e.g., for Telescot et TELESAGE studies); positive impact on co-morbidities (arterial hypertension, weight, dyslipidemia) (e.g., for Telescot and DIABETe studies); better patient’s quality of life (e.g., for DIABETe study); positive impact on appropriation of the disease by patients and/or greater adherence to therapeutic and hygiene-dietary measures (e.g., The Utah Remote Monitoring Project); and at least, good receptiveness by patients and their empowerment. To date, the magnitude of its effects remains debatable, especially with the variation in patients’ characteristics (e.g., background, ability for self-management, medical condition), samples selection and approach for the treatment of control groups. All of the recent studies have been classified as “Moderate” to “High”.