Cargando…

Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study

BACKGROUNDS: Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears is routinely performed using suture anchors, which produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcomes of single row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longo, Umile Giuseppe, Petrillo, Stefano, Loppini, Mattia, Candela, Vincenzo, Rizzello, Giacomo, Maffulli, Nicola, Denaro, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31653247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2834-3
_version_ 1783463119679389696
author Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Petrillo, Stefano
Loppini, Mattia
Candela, Vincenzo
Rizzello, Giacomo
Maffulli, Nicola
Denaro, Vincenzo
author_facet Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Petrillo, Stefano
Loppini, Mattia
Candela, Vincenzo
Rizzello, Giacomo
Maffulli, Nicola
Denaro, Vincenzo
author_sort Longo, Umile Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears is routinely performed using suture anchors, which produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcomes of single row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) performed using metal or biodegradable suture anchors. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in shoulder function using metal or biodegradable suture anchors as evaluated by UCLA shoulder score, Wolfgang criteria, and Oxford shoulder score. METHODS: Arthroscopic RCR was performed in 110 patients included in this case control study. They were divided into 2 groups of 51 and 59 patients respectively. Metal suture anchors were used in group 1, and biodegradable suture anchors in group 2. Results were obtained at a mean follow up of 4.05 + 2 years. Clinical outcomes and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean modified UCLA shoulder score was 26.9 + 7.1 in group 1, and 27.7 + 6.5 in group 2 (P = 0.5); the mean Wolfgang score was 13.3 + 3.3 in group 1, and 14 + 2.6 in group 2 (P = 0.3); the mean OSS was 23.7 + 11.4 in group 1, and 20.7 + 9.2 points in group 2 (P = 0.1). The mean active anterior elevation was 163.5° + 28.2° in group 1 and 163.6° + 26.9 in group 2 (P = 0.9); the mean active external rotation was 46° + 19.7° in group 1 and 44.6° + 16.3° in group 2 (P = 0.7). The mean strength in anterior elevation was 4.8.02 + 23.52 N in group 1, and 43.12 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.2); the mean strength in external rotation was 48.02 + 22.54 N in group 1 and 46.06 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.6); the mean strength in internal rotation was 67.62 + 29.4 N in group 1, and 68.6 + 25.48 N in group 2 (P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: There are no statistically significant differences at a mean follow-up of 4.05 + 2 years in clinical and functional outcomes of single row arthroscopic RCR using metallic or biodegradable suture anchors for RC < 5 cm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68150432019-10-31 Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study Longo, Umile Giuseppe Petrillo, Stefano Loppini, Mattia Candela, Vincenzo Rizzello, Giacomo Maffulli, Nicola Denaro, Vincenzo BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUNDS: Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears is routinely performed using suture anchors, which produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcomes of single row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) performed using metal or biodegradable suture anchors. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in shoulder function using metal or biodegradable suture anchors as evaluated by UCLA shoulder score, Wolfgang criteria, and Oxford shoulder score. METHODS: Arthroscopic RCR was performed in 110 patients included in this case control study. They were divided into 2 groups of 51 and 59 patients respectively. Metal suture anchors were used in group 1, and biodegradable suture anchors in group 2. Results were obtained at a mean follow up of 4.05 + 2 years. Clinical outcomes and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean modified UCLA shoulder score was 26.9 + 7.1 in group 1, and 27.7 + 6.5 in group 2 (P = 0.5); the mean Wolfgang score was 13.3 + 3.3 in group 1, and 14 + 2.6 in group 2 (P = 0.3); the mean OSS was 23.7 + 11.4 in group 1, and 20.7 + 9.2 points in group 2 (P = 0.1). The mean active anterior elevation was 163.5° + 28.2° in group 1 and 163.6° + 26.9 in group 2 (P = 0.9); the mean active external rotation was 46° + 19.7° in group 1 and 44.6° + 16.3° in group 2 (P = 0.7). The mean strength in anterior elevation was 4.8.02 + 23.52 N in group 1, and 43.12 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.2); the mean strength in external rotation was 48.02 + 22.54 N in group 1 and 46.06 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.6); the mean strength in internal rotation was 67.62 + 29.4 N in group 1, and 68.6 + 25.48 N in group 2 (P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: There are no statistically significant differences at a mean follow-up of 4.05 + 2 years in clinical and functional outcomes of single row arthroscopic RCR using metallic or biodegradable suture anchors for RC < 5 cm. BioMed Central 2019-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6815043/ /pubmed/31653247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2834-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Petrillo, Stefano
Loppini, Mattia
Candela, Vincenzo
Rizzello, Giacomo
Maffulli, Nicola
Denaro, Vincenzo
Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study
title Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study
title_full Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study
title_fullStr Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study
title_full_unstemmed Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study
title_short Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study
title_sort metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31653247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2834-3
work_keys_str_mv AT longoumilegiuseppe metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy
AT petrillostefano metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy
AT loppinimattia metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy
AT candelavincenzo metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy
AT rizzellogiacomo metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy
AT maffullinicola metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy
AT denarovincenzo metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy