Cargando…
Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study
BACKGROUNDS: Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears is routinely performed using suture anchors, which produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcomes of single row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) perf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31653247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2834-3 |
_version_ | 1783463119679389696 |
---|---|
author | Longo, Umile Giuseppe Petrillo, Stefano Loppini, Mattia Candela, Vincenzo Rizzello, Giacomo Maffulli, Nicola Denaro, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Longo, Umile Giuseppe Petrillo, Stefano Loppini, Mattia Candela, Vincenzo Rizzello, Giacomo Maffulli, Nicola Denaro, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Longo, Umile Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUNDS: Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears is routinely performed using suture anchors, which produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcomes of single row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) performed using metal or biodegradable suture anchors. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in shoulder function using metal or biodegradable suture anchors as evaluated by UCLA shoulder score, Wolfgang criteria, and Oxford shoulder score. METHODS: Arthroscopic RCR was performed in 110 patients included in this case control study. They were divided into 2 groups of 51 and 59 patients respectively. Metal suture anchors were used in group 1, and biodegradable suture anchors in group 2. Results were obtained at a mean follow up of 4.05 + 2 years. Clinical outcomes and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean modified UCLA shoulder score was 26.9 + 7.1 in group 1, and 27.7 + 6.5 in group 2 (P = 0.5); the mean Wolfgang score was 13.3 + 3.3 in group 1, and 14 + 2.6 in group 2 (P = 0.3); the mean OSS was 23.7 + 11.4 in group 1, and 20.7 + 9.2 points in group 2 (P = 0.1). The mean active anterior elevation was 163.5° + 28.2° in group 1 and 163.6° + 26.9 in group 2 (P = 0.9); the mean active external rotation was 46° + 19.7° in group 1 and 44.6° + 16.3° in group 2 (P = 0.7). The mean strength in anterior elevation was 4.8.02 + 23.52 N in group 1, and 43.12 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.2); the mean strength in external rotation was 48.02 + 22.54 N in group 1 and 46.06 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.6); the mean strength in internal rotation was 67.62 + 29.4 N in group 1, and 68.6 + 25.48 N in group 2 (P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: There are no statistically significant differences at a mean follow-up of 4.05 + 2 years in clinical and functional outcomes of single row arthroscopic RCR using metallic or biodegradable suture anchors for RC < 5 cm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6815043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68150432019-10-31 Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study Longo, Umile Giuseppe Petrillo, Stefano Loppini, Mattia Candela, Vincenzo Rizzello, Giacomo Maffulli, Nicola Denaro, Vincenzo BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUNDS: Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears is routinely performed using suture anchors, which produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcomes of single row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) performed using metal or biodegradable suture anchors. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in shoulder function using metal or biodegradable suture anchors as evaluated by UCLA shoulder score, Wolfgang criteria, and Oxford shoulder score. METHODS: Arthroscopic RCR was performed in 110 patients included in this case control study. They were divided into 2 groups of 51 and 59 patients respectively. Metal suture anchors were used in group 1, and biodegradable suture anchors in group 2. Results were obtained at a mean follow up of 4.05 + 2 years. Clinical outcomes and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean modified UCLA shoulder score was 26.9 + 7.1 in group 1, and 27.7 + 6.5 in group 2 (P = 0.5); the mean Wolfgang score was 13.3 + 3.3 in group 1, and 14 + 2.6 in group 2 (P = 0.3); the mean OSS was 23.7 + 11.4 in group 1, and 20.7 + 9.2 points in group 2 (P = 0.1). The mean active anterior elevation was 163.5° + 28.2° in group 1 and 163.6° + 26.9 in group 2 (P = 0.9); the mean active external rotation was 46° + 19.7° in group 1 and 44.6° + 16.3° in group 2 (P = 0.7). The mean strength in anterior elevation was 4.8.02 + 23.52 N in group 1, and 43.12 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.2); the mean strength in external rotation was 48.02 + 22.54 N in group 1 and 46.06 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.6); the mean strength in internal rotation was 67.62 + 29.4 N in group 1, and 68.6 + 25.48 N in group 2 (P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: There are no statistically significant differences at a mean follow-up of 4.05 + 2 years in clinical and functional outcomes of single row arthroscopic RCR using metallic or biodegradable suture anchors for RC < 5 cm. BioMed Central 2019-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6815043/ /pubmed/31653247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2834-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Longo, Umile Giuseppe Petrillo, Stefano Loppini, Mattia Candela, Vincenzo Rizzello, Giacomo Maffulli, Nicola Denaro, Vincenzo Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study |
title | Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study |
title_full | Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study |
title_fullStr | Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study |
title_short | Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study |
title_sort | metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31653247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2834-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longoumilegiuseppe metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy AT petrillostefano metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy AT loppinimattia metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy AT candelavincenzo metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy AT rizzellogiacomo metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy AT maffullinicola metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy AT denarovincenzo metallicversusbiodegradablesutureanchorsforrotatorcuffrepairacasecontrolstudy |