Cargando…
Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) refers to a set of somatic and psychological symptoms that occur cyclically in the luteal phase of a menstrual cycle. There is no report of final result of reflexology on PMS. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of reflexology on PMS thr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0165-0 |
_version_ | 1783463121569972224 |
---|---|
author | Hasanpour, Marzieh Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi Shareinia, Habib |
author_facet | Hasanpour, Marzieh Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi Shareinia, Habib |
author_sort | Hasanpour, Marzieh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) refers to a set of somatic and psychological symptoms that occur cyclically in the luteal phase of a menstrual cycle. There is no report of final result of reflexology on PMS. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of reflexology on PMS through a systematic review and meta-analysis study. METHOD: The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis that was conducted by searching in 8 electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, Google Scholar, and SID until December 28, 2018. In this regard, interventional studies, which examined the impact of reflexology on women with premenstrual syndrome, were included. These studies were published during 1993 to 2018. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analysis was performed by the help of CMA 2 software. RESULTS: Nine out of 407 studies finally remained after screening, and quantitative and quantitative analyses were performed on them. The total number of research samples was 475. The mean treatment time with reflexology was 40.55 min per session that was performed in 6 to 10 sessions of treatment in 66.67% of studies. According to the meta-analysis and based on the random effects model, the reflexology could decrease the severity of PMS in the intervention group compared to the control group (SMD = − 2.717, 95% CI: − 3.722 to − 1.712). Meta-regression results indicated that the duration of intervention sessions (β = − 0.1124, 95% CI − 0.142 to − 0.084, p < 0.001) had a significant impact on the severity of PMS. Reflexology could also significantly affect somatic (SMD = − 1.142, 95% CI: − 1.481 to − 0.803) and psychological (SMD = − 1.380, 95% CI: − 2.082 to − 0.677) symptoms arising from PMS. CONCLUSION: In general, results of the present study indicated that the reflexology could relieve PMS symptoms, so that overall scores, somatic and psychological symptoms of PMS decreased by applying the reflexology intervention. Furthermore, an increase in the length of reflexology time in each session increased its efficiency. Reflexology can be used as an effective intervention in a patient care program by nurses and its efficiency can be enhanced by increasing intervention time in each reflexology treatment session. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6815051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68150512019-10-31 Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hasanpour, Marzieh Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi Shareinia, Habib Biopsychosoc Med Research BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) refers to a set of somatic and psychological symptoms that occur cyclically in the luteal phase of a menstrual cycle. There is no report of final result of reflexology on PMS. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of reflexology on PMS through a systematic review and meta-analysis study. METHOD: The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis that was conducted by searching in 8 electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, Google Scholar, and SID until December 28, 2018. In this regard, interventional studies, which examined the impact of reflexology on women with premenstrual syndrome, were included. These studies were published during 1993 to 2018. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analysis was performed by the help of CMA 2 software. RESULTS: Nine out of 407 studies finally remained after screening, and quantitative and quantitative analyses were performed on them. The total number of research samples was 475. The mean treatment time with reflexology was 40.55 min per session that was performed in 6 to 10 sessions of treatment in 66.67% of studies. According to the meta-analysis and based on the random effects model, the reflexology could decrease the severity of PMS in the intervention group compared to the control group (SMD = − 2.717, 95% CI: − 3.722 to − 1.712). Meta-regression results indicated that the duration of intervention sessions (β = − 0.1124, 95% CI − 0.142 to − 0.084, p < 0.001) had a significant impact on the severity of PMS. Reflexology could also significantly affect somatic (SMD = − 1.142, 95% CI: − 1.481 to − 0.803) and psychological (SMD = − 1.380, 95% CI: − 2.082 to − 0.677) symptoms arising from PMS. CONCLUSION: In general, results of the present study indicated that the reflexology could relieve PMS symptoms, so that overall scores, somatic and psychological symptoms of PMS decreased by applying the reflexology intervention. Furthermore, an increase in the length of reflexology time in each session increased its efficiency. Reflexology can be used as an effective intervention in a patient care program by nurses and its efficiency can be enhanced by increasing intervention time in each reflexology treatment session. BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6815051/ /pubmed/31673284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0165-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hasanpour, Marzieh Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi Shareinia, Habib Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0165-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasanpourmarzieh effectsofreflexologyonpremenstrualsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohammadimohammadmehdi effectsofreflexologyonpremenstrualsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shareiniahabib effectsofreflexologyonpremenstrualsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |