Cargando…

Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) refers to a set of somatic and psychological symptoms that occur cyclically in the luteal phase of a menstrual cycle. There is no report of final result of reflexology on PMS. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of reflexology on PMS thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasanpour, Marzieh, Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi, Shareinia, Habib
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0165-0
_version_ 1783463121569972224
author Hasanpour, Marzieh
Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi
Shareinia, Habib
author_facet Hasanpour, Marzieh
Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi
Shareinia, Habib
author_sort Hasanpour, Marzieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) refers to a set of somatic and psychological symptoms that occur cyclically in the luteal phase of a menstrual cycle. There is no report of final result of reflexology on PMS. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of reflexology on PMS through a systematic review and meta-analysis study. METHOD: The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis that was conducted by searching in 8 electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, Google Scholar, and SID until December 28, 2018. In this regard, interventional studies, which examined the impact of reflexology on women with premenstrual syndrome, were included. These studies were published during 1993 to 2018. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analysis was performed by the help of CMA 2 software. RESULTS: Nine out of 407 studies finally remained after screening, and quantitative and quantitative analyses were performed on them. The total number of research samples was 475. The mean treatment time with reflexology was 40.55 min per session that was performed in 6 to 10 sessions of treatment in 66.67% of studies. According to the meta-analysis and based on the random effects model, the reflexology could decrease the severity of PMS in the intervention group compared to the control group (SMD = − 2.717, 95% CI: − 3.722 to − 1.712). Meta-regression results indicated that the duration of intervention sessions (β = − 0.1124, 95% CI − 0.142 to − 0.084, p < 0.001) had a significant impact on the severity of PMS. Reflexology could also significantly affect somatic (SMD = − 1.142, 95% CI: − 1.481 to − 0.803) and psychological (SMD = − 1.380, 95% CI: − 2.082 to − 0.677) symptoms arising from PMS. CONCLUSION: In general, results of the present study indicated that the reflexology could relieve PMS symptoms, so that overall scores, somatic and psychological symptoms of PMS decreased by applying the reflexology intervention. Furthermore, an increase in the length of reflexology time in each session increased its efficiency. Reflexology can be used as an effective intervention in a patient care program by nurses and its efficiency can be enhanced by increasing intervention time in each reflexology treatment session.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68150512019-10-31 Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hasanpour, Marzieh Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi Shareinia, Habib Biopsychosoc Med Research BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) refers to a set of somatic and psychological symptoms that occur cyclically in the luteal phase of a menstrual cycle. There is no report of final result of reflexology on PMS. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of reflexology on PMS through a systematic review and meta-analysis study. METHOD: The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis that was conducted by searching in 8 electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, Google Scholar, and SID until December 28, 2018. In this regard, interventional studies, which examined the impact of reflexology on women with premenstrual syndrome, were included. These studies were published during 1993 to 2018. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Meta-analysis was performed by the help of CMA 2 software. RESULTS: Nine out of 407 studies finally remained after screening, and quantitative and quantitative analyses were performed on them. The total number of research samples was 475. The mean treatment time with reflexology was 40.55 min per session that was performed in 6 to 10 sessions of treatment in 66.67% of studies. According to the meta-analysis and based on the random effects model, the reflexology could decrease the severity of PMS in the intervention group compared to the control group (SMD = − 2.717, 95% CI: − 3.722 to − 1.712). Meta-regression results indicated that the duration of intervention sessions (β = − 0.1124, 95% CI − 0.142 to − 0.084, p < 0.001) had a significant impact on the severity of PMS. Reflexology could also significantly affect somatic (SMD = − 1.142, 95% CI: − 1.481 to − 0.803) and psychological (SMD = − 1.380, 95% CI: − 2.082 to − 0.677) symptoms arising from PMS. CONCLUSION: In general, results of the present study indicated that the reflexology could relieve PMS symptoms, so that overall scores, somatic and psychological symptoms of PMS decreased by applying the reflexology intervention. Furthermore, an increase in the length of reflexology time in each session increased its efficiency. Reflexology can be used as an effective intervention in a patient care program by nurses and its efficiency can be enhanced by increasing intervention time in each reflexology treatment session. BioMed Central 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6815051/ /pubmed/31673284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0165-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hasanpour, Marzieh
Mohammadi, Mohammad Mehdi
Shareinia, Habib
Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of reflexology on premenstrual syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0165-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanpourmarzieh effectsofreflexologyonpremenstrualsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammadimohammadmehdi effectsofreflexologyonpremenstrualsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shareiniahabib effectsofreflexologyonpremenstrualsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis