Cargando…
Visual Outcomes of Adding Erythropoietin to Methylprednisolone for Treatment of Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis
PURPOSE: To compare the short-term visual function results and safety of erythropoietin as an add-on to the standard corticosteroid therapy in retrobulbar optic neuritis (RON). METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, adult patients with isolated RON with less than 10 days of onset were enrolled. P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660109 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4786 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To compare the short-term visual function results and safety of erythropoietin as an add-on to the standard corticosteroid therapy in retrobulbar optic neuritis (RON). METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, adult patients with isolated RON with less than 10 days of onset were enrolled. Patients were consecutively assigned to standard intravenous methylprednisolone treatment either in combination with intravenous erythropoietin (20,000 units/day for three days) (group-1) or intravenous methylprednisolone alone (group-2). Primary outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), which was assessed up to 120 days from the day the treatment was begun. Systemic evaluations were performed during and after treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with RON (mean age = 26.6 [Formula: see text] 5.77 years; range = 18–40 years) were enrolled into the study (group-1, [Formula: see text] = 35; group-2, [Formula: see text] = 27). BCVA three months after the treatment was 0.19 [Formula: see text] 0.55 logMAR and 0.11 [Formula: see text] 0.32 logMAR in group-1 and group-2, respectively (95% CI: [Formula: see text] 0.61 [Formula: see text] 0.16; [Formula: see text] = 0.62). Change in BCVA after three months was 2.84 [Formula: see text] 3.49 logMAR in group-1 and 2.46 [Formula: see text] 1.40 logMAR in group-2 (95% CI: [Formula: see text] 0.93 [Formula: see text] 1.91; [Formula: see text] = 0.57). Pace of recovery was not significantly different between the groups. No complications were detected among patients. CONCLUSION: Intravenous erythropoietin as an add-on did not significantly improve the visual outcome in terms of visual acuity, visual field, and contrast sensitivity compared to traditional intravenous corticosteroid. This pilot study supports the safety profile of intravenous human recombinant erythropoietin, and it may help formulate future investigations with a larger sample size. |
---|