Cargando…

Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study

PURPOSE: To report histopathological findings for different types of polymers proposed as support for a Pintucci-type keratoprosthesis. METHODS: Six polymers, including three types of polyesters ([Formula: see text] 1-3), one type of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, [Formula: see text] 4), polyethylen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahmani, Saeed, Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei, Javadi, Mohammad Ali, Langroudi, Masoumeh Meskinfam, Aski, Sasha Afsar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660102
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4779
_version_ 1783463158986309632
author Rahmani, Saeed
Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei
Javadi, Mohammad Ali
Langroudi, Masoumeh Meskinfam
Aski, Sasha Afsar
author_facet Rahmani, Saeed
Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei
Javadi, Mohammad Ali
Langroudi, Masoumeh Meskinfam
Aski, Sasha Afsar
author_sort Rahmani, Saeed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report histopathological findings for different types of polymers proposed as support for a Pintucci-type keratoprosthesis. METHODS: Six polymers, including three types of polyesters ([Formula: see text] 1-3), one type of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, [Formula: see text] 4), polyethylene ([Formula: see text] 5), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE, [Formula: see text] 6) were evaluated. Four samples of each material were placed under the orbicularis oculi muscles of 12 rabbits. After five weeks, the samples were removed and evaluated histopathologically. Fibrovascular tissue ingrowths were investigated in terms of tissue penetration depth into the materials (graded as none, mild, moderate, and intense) and fibrovascular ingrowth area at the ultimate level of tissue penetrance. ImageJ software was used to calculate fibrovascular tissue area between the material fibers, and the mean area values were compared between the materials. RESULTS: Polyester materials [Formula: see text] 1 and [Formula: see text] 3 demonstrated intense fibrovascular tissue penetration with a large fibrovascular ingrowth area; no overt tissue ingrowth was observed into material #6. The mean area of penetrated fibrovascular tissues was significantly different between materials ([Formula: see text] < 0.001). Materials [Formula: see text] 2, [Formula: see text] 4, and [Formula: see text] 5 showed moderate fibrovascular tissue ingrowth and the area of presented fibrovascular tissue at the paracentral parts of material [Formula: see text] 4 was significantly smaller than that of materials [Formula: see text] 1 ([Formula: see text] = 0.02) and [Formula: see text] 3 ([Formula: see text] = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Two polyester materials that had relatively large pore sizes demonstrated a deep and large area of fibrovascular ingrowth. Given that material #3 is thicker and more consistent than material [Formula: see text] 1, the former can be used as the appropriate material for supporting the Pintucci-type keratoprosthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68153452019-10-28 Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study Rahmani, Saeed Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei Javadi, Mohammad Ali Langroudi, Masoumeh Meskinfam Aski, Sasha Afsar J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To report histopathological findings for different types of polymers proposed as support for a Pintucci-type keratoprosthesis. METHODS: Six polymers, including three types of polyesters ([Formula: see text] 1-3), one type of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, [Formula: see text] 4), polyethylene ([Formula: see text] 5), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE, [Formula: see text] 6) were evaluated. Four samples of each material were placed under the orbicularis oculi muscles of 12 rabbits. After five weeks, the samples were removed and evaluated histopathologically. Fibrovascular tissue ingrowths were investigated in terms of tissue penetration depth into the materials (graded as none, mild, moderate, and intense) and fibrovascular ingrowth area at the ultimate level of tissue penetrance. ImageJ software was used to calculate fibrovascular tissue area between the material fibers, and the mean area values were compared between the materials. RESULTS: Polyester materials [Formula: see text] 1 and [Formula: see text] 3 demonstrated intense fibrovascular tissue penetration with a large fibrovascular ingrowth area; no overt tissue ingrowth was observed into material #6. The mean area of penetrated fibrovascular tissues was significantly different between materials ([Formula: see text] < 0.001). Materials [Formula: see text] 2, [Formula: see text] 4, and [Formula: see text] 5 showed moderate fibrovascular tissue ingrowth and the area of presented fibrovascular tissue at the paracentral parts of material [Formula: see text] 4 was significantly smaller than that of materials [Formula: see text] 1 ([Formula: see text] = 0.02) and [Formula: see text] 3 ([Formula: see text] = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Two polyester materials that had relatively large pore sizes demonstrated a deep and large area of fibrovascular ingrowth. Given that material #3 is thicker and more consistent than material [Formula: see text] 1, the former can be used as the appropriate material for supporting the Pintucci-type keratoprosthesis. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6815345/ /pubmed/31660102 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4779 Text en Copyright © 2019 Rahmani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rahmani, Saeed
Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei
Javadi, Mohammad Ali
Langroudi, Masoumeh Meskinfam
Aski, Sasha Afsar
Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study
title Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study
title_full Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study
title_fullStr Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study
title_full_unstemmed Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study
title_short Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study
title_sort histopathologic evaluation of polymer supports for pintucci-type keratoprostheses: an animal study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660102
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4779
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmanisaeed histopathologicevaluationofpolymersupportsforpintuccitypekeratoprosthesesananimalstudy
AT kanavimozhganrezaei histopathologicevaluationofpolymersupportsforpintuccitypekeratoprosthesesananimalstudy
AT javadimohammadali histopathologicevaluationofpolymersupportsforpintuccitypekeratoprosthesesananimalstudy
AT langroudimasoumehmeskinfam histopathologicevaluationofpolymersupportsforpintuccitypekeratoprosthesesananimalstudy
AT askisashaafsar histopathologicevaluationofpolymersupportsforpintuccitypekeratoprosthesesananimalstudy