Cargando…
Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -
BACKGROUND: In 2005, the German Association of Occupational Accident Insurance Funds (DGUV) defined radiological evaluation criteria for the assessment of degenerative occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. These include the measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of ver...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2878-4 |
_version_ | 1783463165729701888 |
---|---|
author | Ulmar, Benjamin Wölfle-Roos, Julia Kocak, Tugrul Brunner, Alexander |
author_facet | Ulmar, Benjamin Wölfle-Roos, Julia Kocak, Tugrul Brunner, Alexander |
author_sort | Ulmar, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2005, the German Association of Occupational Accident Insurance Funds (DGUV) defined radiological evaluation criteria for the assessment of degenerative occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. These include the measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis, antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis, and spondyloarthritis via plain radiography. The measures currently remain in daily use for determining worker compensation among those with occupational diseases. Here, we aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of these evaluation criteria. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients with occupational degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Native antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of these patients were evaluated according to DGUV recommendations by 4 observers with different levels of clinical training. Evaluations were again conducted after 2 months to assess the intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis showed good inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.755) and excellent intra-observer reliability (ICC: 0.827). The classification of vertebral osteosclerosis exhibited moderate kappa values for inter-observer reliability (К: 0.426) and intra-observer reliability (К: 0.441); the remaining 3 criteria showed poor inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. CONCLUSION: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis showed adequate inter- and intra-observer reliability in the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine, whereas the classification of antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis and spondyloarthritis stage exhibited insufficient reliability. Hence, we recommend the revision of the DGUV recommendations for the evaluation of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6815376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68153762019-10-31 Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - Ulmar, Benjamin Wölfle-Roos, Julia Kocak, Tugrul Brunner, Alexander BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2005, the German Association of Occupational Accident Insurance Funds (DGUV) defined radiological evaluation criteria for the assessment of degenerative occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. These include the measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis, antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis, and spondyloarthritis via plain radiography. The measures currently remain in daily use for determining worker compensation among those with occupational diseases. Here, we aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of these evaluation criteria. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients with occupational degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Native antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of these patients were evaluated according to DGUV recommendations by 4 observers with different levels of clinical training. Evaluations were again conducted after 2 months to assess the intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis showed good inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.755) and excellent intra-observer reliability (ICC: 0.827). The classification of vertebral osteosclerosis exhibited moderate kappa values for inter-observer reliability (К: 0.426) and intra-observer reliability (К: 0.441); the remaining 3 criteria showed poor inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. CONCLUSION: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis showed adequate inter- and intra-observer reliability in the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine, whereas the classification of antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis and spondyloarthritis stage exhibited insufficient reliability. Hence, we recommend the revision of the DGUV recommendations for the evaluation of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. BioMed Central 2019-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6815376/ /pubmed/31656177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2878-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ulmar, Benjamin Wölfle-Roos, Julia Kocak, Tugrul Brunner, Alexander Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - |
title | Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - |
title_full | Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - |
title_fullStr | Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - |
title_short | Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - |
title_sort | evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2878-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ulmarbenjamin evaluationcriteriafortheassessmentofoccupationaldiseasesofthelumbarspinehowreliablearethey AT wolfleroosjulia evaluationcriteriafortheassessmentofoccupationaldiseasesofthelumbarspinehowreliablearethey AT kocaktugrul evaluationcriteriafortheassessmentofoccupationaldiseasesofthelumbarspinehowreliablearethey AT brunneralexander evaluationcriteriafortheassessmentofoccupationaldiseasesofthelumbarspinehowreliablearethey |