Cargando…

Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -

BACKGROUND: In 2005, the German Association of Occupational Accident Insurance Funds (DGUV) defined radiological evaluation criteria for the assessment of degenerative occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. These include the measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of ver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ulmar, Benjamin, Wölfle-Roos, Julia, Kocak, Tugrul, Brunner, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2878-4
_version_ 1783463165729701888
author Ulmar, Benjamin
Wölfle-Roos, Julia
Kocak, Tugrul
Brunner, Alexander
author_facet Ulmar, Benjamin
Wölfle-Roos, Julia
Kocak, Tugrul
Brunner, Alexander
author_sort Ulmar, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2005, the German Association of Occupational Accident Insurance Funds (DGUV) defined radiological evaluation criteria for the assessment of degenerative occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. These include the measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis, antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis, and spondyloarthritis via plain radiography. The measures currently remain in daily use for determining worker compensation among those with occupational diseases. Here, we aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of these evaluation criteria. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients with occupational degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Native antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of these patients were evaluated according to DGUV recommendations by 4 observers with different levels of clinical training. Evaluations were again conducted after 2 months to assess the intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis showed good inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.755) and excellent intra-observer reliability (ICC: 0.827). The classification of vertebral osteosclerosis exhibited moderate kappa values for inter-observer reliability (К: 0.426) and intra-observer reliability (К: 0.441); the remaining 3 criteria showed poor inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. CONCLUSION: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis showed adequate inter- and intra-observer reliability in the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine, whereas the classification of antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis and spondyloarthritis stage exhibited insufficient reliability. Hence, we recommend the revision of the DGUV recommendations for the evaluation of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68153762019-10-31 Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? - Ulmar, Benjamin Wölfle-Roos, Julia Kocak, Tugrul Brunner, Alexander BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2005, the German Association of Occupational Accident Insurance Funds (DGUV) defined radiological evaluation criteria for the assessment of degenerative occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. These include the measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis, antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis, and spondyloarthritis via plain radiography. The measures currently remain in daily use for determining worker compensation among those with occupational diseases. Here, we aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of these evaluation criteria. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients with occupational degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Native antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of these patients were evaluated according to DGUV recommendations by 4 observers with different levels of clinical training. Evaluations were again conducted after 2 months to assess the intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis showed good inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.755) and excellent intra-observer reliability (ICC: 0.827). The classification of vertebral osteosclerosis exhibited moderate kappa values for inter-observer reliability (К: 0.426) and intra-observer reliability (К: 0.441); the remaining 3 criteria showed poor inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. CONCLUSION: The measurement of intervertebral osteochondrosis and classification of vertebral osteosclerosis showed adequate inter- and intra-observer reliability in the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine, whereas the classification of antero-lateral and posterior spondylosis and spondyloarthritis stage exhibited insufficient reliability. Hence, we recommend the revision of the DGUV recommendations for the evaluation of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine. BioMed Central 2019-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6815376/ /pubmed/31656177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2878-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ulmar, Benjamin
Wölfle-Roos, Julia
Kocak, Tugrul
Brunner, Alexander
Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -
title Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -
title_full Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -
title_fullStr Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -
title_short Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -
title_sort evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they? -
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31656177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2878-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ulmarbenjamin evaluationcriteriafortheassessmentofoccupationaldiseasesofthelumbarspinehowreliablearethey
AT wolfleroosjulia evaluationcriteriafortheassessmentofoccupationaldiseasesofthelumbarspinehowreliablearethey
AT kocaktugrul evaluationcriteriafortheassessmentofoccupationaldiseasesofthelumbarspinehowreliablearethey
AT brunneralexander evaluationcriteriafortheassessmentofoccupationaldiseasesofthelumbarspinehowreliablearethey