Cargando…

The Application of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Regional Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy with Spleen Kept In Situ and Laparotomy with Spleen Lifted Out of the Abdomen for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Findings whether laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with spleen kept in situ or laparotomy with spleen lifted out of the abdomen is more effective remain inconclusive. This study is aimed at comparing outcomes of spleen-preserving splenic regional laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Que, Changrong, Lin, Shuangming, Zhu, Yibin, Xu, Dongbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4283183
_version_ 1783463228844539904
author Que, Changrong
Lin, Shuangming
Zhu, Yibin
Xu, Dongbo
author_facet Que, Changrong
Lin, Shuangming
Zhu, Yibin
Xu, Dongbo
author_sort Que, Changrong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Findings whether laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with spleen kept in situ or laparotomy with spleen lifted out of the abdomen is more effective remain inconclusive. This study is aimed at comparing outcomes of spleen-preserving splenic regional laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with spleen kept in situ versus laparotomy with spleen lifted out of the abdomen for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer. METHODS: Data from patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer were collected from January 2011 to January 2014. A total of 246 patients were identified who received D2 radical total gastrectomy together with spleen-preserving splenic regional lymphadenectomy. Of those patients, 87 patients underwent laparoscopic splenic regional lymphadenectomy with spleen kept in situ (LSKS-SRLA) and 159 patients underwent laparotomy with spleen lifted out of the abdomen (LSLA-SRLA). Surgical outcomes and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total number of lymph node dissection, intraoperative blood loss volume, intraoperative injury cases, and postoperative complications had no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The number of splenic regional lymph node dissections was 3.90 ± 1.05 per case in the LSLA-SRLA group and 2.89 ± 1.04 in the LSKS-SRLA group. The operation time, length of the incision, and hospital days were shorter in the LSKS-SRLA group. The total recurrence and metastatic rates and 3-year cumulative survival rate had no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Similar long-term outcomes were achieved in the LSKS-SRLA and LSLA-SRLA groups for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer. However, in the aspects of surgical time, length of incision, and postoperative recovery, the LSKS-SRLA group had obvious advantages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68156322019-11-17 The Application of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Regional Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy with Spleen Kept In Situ and Laparotomy with Spleen Lifted Out of the Abdomen for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study Que, Changrong Lin, Shuangming Zhu, Yibin Xu, Dongbo Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Findings whether laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with spleen kept in situ or laparotomy with spleen lifted out of the abdomen is more effective remain inconclusive. This study is aimed at comparing outcomes of spleen-preserving splenic regional laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with spleen kept in situ versus laparotomy with spleen lifted out of the abdomen for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer. METHODS: Data from patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer were collected from January 2011 to January 2014. A total of 246 patients were identified who received D2 radical total gastrectomy together with spleen-preserving splenic regional lymphadenectomy. Of those patients, 87 patients underwent laparoscopic splenic regional lymphadenectomy with spleen kept in situ (LSKS-SRLA) and 159 patients underwent laparotomy with spleen lifted out of the abdomen (LSLA-SRLA). Surgical outcomes and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total number of lymph node dissection, intraoperative blood loss volume, intraoperative injury cases, and postoperative complications had no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The number of splenic regional lymph node dissections was 3.90 ± 1.05 per case in the LSLA-SRLA group and 2.89 ± 1.04 in the LSKS-SRLA group. The operation time, length of the incision, and hospital days were shorter in the LSKS-SRLA group. The total recurrence and metastatic rates and 3-year cumulative survival rate had no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Similar long-term outcomes were achieved in the LSKS-SRLA and LSLA-SRLA groups for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer. However, in the aspects of surgical time, length of incision, and postoperative recovery, the LSKS-SRLA group had obvious advantages. Hindawi 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6815632/ /pubmed/31737066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4283183 Text en Copyright © 2019 Changrong Que et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Que, Changrong
Lin, Shuangming
Zhu, Yibin
Xu, Dongbo
The Application of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Regional Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy with Spleen Kept In Situ and Laparotomy with Spleen Lifted Out of the Abdomen for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title The Application of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Regional Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy with Spleen Kept In Situ and Laparotomy with Spleen Lifted Out of the Abdomen for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_full The Application of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Regional Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy with Spleen Kept In Situ and Laparotomy with Spleen Lifted Out of the Abdomen for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr The Application of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Regional Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy with Spleen Kept In Situ and Laparotomy with Spleen Lifted Out of the Abdomen for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Application of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Regional Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy with Spleen Kept In Situ and Laparotomy with Spleen Lifted Out of the Abdomen for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_short The Application of Spleen-Preserving Splenic Regional Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy with Spleen Kept In Situ and Laparotomy with Spleen Lifted Out of the Abdomen for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study
title_sort application of spleen-preserving splenic regional laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with spleen kept in situ and laparotomy with spleen lifted out of the abdomen for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4283183
work_keys_str_mv AT quechangrong theapplicationofspleenpreservingsplenicregionallaparoscopiclymphadenectomywithspleenkeptinsituandlaparotomywithspleenliftedoutoftheabdomenforlocallyadvancedproximalgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT linshuangming theapplicationofspleenpreservingsplenicregionallaparoscopiclymphadenectomywithspleenkeptinsituandlaparotomywithspleenliftedoutoftheabdomenforlocallyadvancedproximalgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT zhuyibin theapplicationofspleenpreservingsplenicregionallaparoscopiclymphadenectomywithspleenkeptinsituandlaparotomywithspleenliftedoutoftheabdomenforlocallyadvancedproximalgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT xudongbo theapplicationofspleenpreservingsplenicregionallaparoscopiclymphadenectomywithspleenkeptinsituandlaparotomywithspleenliftedoutoftheabdomenforlocallyadvancedproximalgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT quechangrong applicationofspleenpreservingsplenicregionallaparoscopiclymphadenectomywithspleenkeptinsituandlaparotomywithspleenliftedoutoftheabdomenforlocallyadvancedproximalgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT linshuangming applicationofspleenpreservingsplenicregionallaparoscopiclymphadenectomywithspleenkeptinsituandlaparotomywithspleenliftedoutoftheabdomenforlocallyadvancedproximalgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT zhuyibin applicationofspleenpreservingsplenicregionallaparoscopiclymphadenectomywithspleenkeptinsituandlaparotomywithspleenliftedoutoftheabdomenforlocallyadvancedproximalgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy
AT xudongbo applicationofspleenpreservingsplenicregionallaparoscopiclymphadenectomywithspleenkeptinsituandlaparotomywithspleenliftedoutoftheabdomenforlocallyadvancedproximalgastriccanceraretrospectivestudy