Cargando…

Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis is one of the most well-known causes of pain and stiffness of the shoulder. Corticosteroid injections have been used for many years. However, it is still controversial where corticosteroid should be injected, whether subacromial or intra-articular. OBJECTIVE: The obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shang, Xiaoke, Zhang, Zhong, Pan, Xuelin, Li, Jian, Li, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1274790
_version_ 1783463231731269632
author Shang, Xiaoke
Zhang, Zhong
Pan, Xuelin
Li, Jian
Li, Qi
author_facet Shang, Xiaoke
Zhang, Zhong
Pan, Xuelin
Li, Jian
Li, Qi
author_sort Shang, Xiaoke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis is one of the most well-known causes of pain and stiffness of the shoulder. Corticosteroid injections have been used for many years. However, it is still controversial where corticosteroid should be injected, whether subacromial or intra-articular. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of intra-articular (IA) and subacromial (SA) corticosteroid injections for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four foreign databases and two Chinese databases were searched for RCTs and quasi-RCTs involving the comparison of IA and SA corticosteroid injection for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and PEDro score were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The primary clinical outcomes including VAS, Constant score, ASES score, and ROM were collected. The secondary outcome of corticosteroid-related adverse reactions was also compared between the two groups. The results were evaluated and compared at five time points. Subgroup analyses were performed to further explore the differences between groups. RESULTS: Eight RCTs and one quasi-RCT, involving 512 participants, were identified and included in this meta-analysis. All studies were of low risk of bias and medium-high quality with the PEDro score ≥5 points. The pooled effect showed that there was no significant difference in the primary outcomes between IA injection and SA injection, with an exception of VAS at 2-3 weeks (P=0.02) and ROM of internal rotation at 8–12 weeks (P=0.02). According to the results of subgroup analyses, the differences of VAS and ROM of internal rotation did not last beyond the 2-3-week time period. Additionally, SA injection had the advantage of avoiding adverse reactions from the corticosteroid, especially in avoiding a large fluctuation of serum blood glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: When corticosteroid injection is used to treat adhesive capsulitis, both injection sites can be selected. However, due to the scarcity of related studies, more rigorous trials are needed to confirm the current findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68156442019-11-17 Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Shang, Xiaoke Zhang, Zhong Pan, Xuelin Li, Jian Li, Qi Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis is one of the most well-known causes of pain and stiffness of the shoulder. Corticosteroid injections have been used for many years. However, it is still controversial where corticosteroid should be injected, whether subacromial or intra-articular. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of intra-articular (IA) and subacromial (SA) corticosteroid injections for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four foreign databases and two Chinese databases were searched for RCTs and quasi-RCTs involving the comparison of IA and SA corticosteroid injection for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and PEDro score were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The primary clinical outcomes including VAS, Constant score, ASES score, and ROM were collected. The secondary outcome of corticosteroid-related adverse reactions was also compared between the two groups. The results were evaluated and compared at five time points. Subgroup analyses were performed to further explore the differences between groups. RESULTS: Eight RCTs and one quasi-RCT, involving 512 participants, were identified and included in this meta-analysis. All studies were of low risk of bias and medium-high quality with the PEDro score ≥5 points. The pooled effect showed that there was no significant difference in the primary outcomes between IA injection and SA injection, with an exception of VAS at 2-3 weeks (P=0.02) and ROM of internal rotation at 8–12 weeks (P=0.02). According to the results of subgroup analyses, the differences of VAS and ROM of internal rotation did not last beyond the 2-3-week time period. Additionally, SA injection had the advantage of avoiding adverse reactions from the corticosteroid, especially in avoiding a large fluctuation of serum blood glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: When corticosteroid injection is used to treat adhesive capsulitis, both injection sites can be selected. However, due to the scarcity of related studies, more rigorous trials are needed to confirm the current findings. Hindawi 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6815644/ /pubmed/31737653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1274790 Text en Copyright © 2019 Xiaoke Shang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shang, Xiaoke
Zhang, Zhong
Pan, Xuelin
Li, Jian
Li, Qi
Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_full Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_fullStr Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_short Intra-Articular versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_sort intra-articular versus subacromial corticosteroid injection for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1274790
work_keys_str_mv AT shangxiaoke intraarticularversussubacromialcorticosteroidinjectionforthetreatmentofadhesivecapsulitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT zhangzhong intraarticularversussubacromialcorticosteroidinjectionforthetreatmentofadhesivecapsulitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT panxuelin intraarticularversussubacromialcorticosteroidinjectionforthetreatmentofadhesivecapsulitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT lijian intraarticularversussubacromialcorticosteroidinjectionforthetreatmentofadhesivecapsulitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT liqi intraarticularversussubacromialcorticosteroidinjectionforthetreatmentofadhesivecapsulitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview