Cargando…

Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries

BACKGROUND: Health information exchange (HIE) is frequently cited as an important objective of health information technology investment because of its potential to improve quality, reduce cost, and increase patient satisfaction. In this paper we examine the status and practices of HIE in six countri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, Thomas H, Lovis, Christian, Gutteridge, Charles, Pagliari, Claudia, Natarajan, Shivam, Yong, Cui, Zhao, Lue-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673351
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020427
_version_ 1783463234982903808
author Payne, Thomas H
Lovis, Christian
Gutteridge, Charles
Pagliari, Claudia
Natarajan, Shivam
Yong, Cui
Zhao, Lue-Ping
author_facet Payne, Thomas H
Lovis, Christian
Gutteridge, Charles
Pagliari, Claudia
Natarajan, Shivam
Yong, Cui
Zhao, Lue-Ping
author_sort Payne, Thomas H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health information exchange (HIE) is frequently cited as an important objective of health information technology investment because of its potential to improve quality, reduce cost, and increase patient satisfaction. In this paper we examine the status and practices of HIE in six countries, drawn from a range of higher and lower income regions. METHODS: For each of the countries represented – China, England, India, Scotland, Switzerland, and the United States – we describe the state of current practice of HIE with reference to two scenarios: transfer of care and referral. For each country we discuss national objectives, barriers and plans for further advancing clinical information exchange. RESULTS: The countries vary widely in levels of adoption of EHRs, availability of health information in electronic form suitable for HIE, and in the information technology infrastructure to be used for transmission. Common themes emerged, however, including an expectation that information will be exchanged rather than gathered anew, the need for incentives to promote information exchange, and concerns about data security and patient confidentiality. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ability to transfer health information to where it is most needed is nearly always mentioned as an advantage of HIE adoption, there are wide differences in the degree to which this has been achieved to support the scenarios used in this study. Nevertheless, these differences indicate varying stages of progress along a comparable pathway, with similar barriers being identified in the countries described. In some cases, these have been partially surmounted while elsewhere work is needed. We reflect on contextual factors influencing the status and direction of HIE efforts in different global regions and their implications for progress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Edinburgh University Global Health Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68156562019-10-31 Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries Payne, Thomas H Lovis, Christian Gutteridge, Charles Pagliari, Claudia Natarajan, Shivam Yong, Cui Zhao, Lue-Ping J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Health information exchange (HIE) is frequently cited as an important objective of health information technology investment because of its potential to improve quality, reduce cost, and increase patient satisfaction. In this paper we examine the status and practices of HIE in six countries, drawn from a range of higher and lower income regions. METHODS: For each of the countries represented – China, England, India, Scotland, Switzerland, and the United States – we describe the state of current practice of HIE with reference to two scenarios: transfer of care and referral. For each country we discuss national objectives, barriers and plans for further advancing clinical information exchange. RESULTS: The countries vary widely in levels of adoption of EHRs, availability of health information in electronic form suitable for HIE, and in the information technology infrastructure to be used for transmission. Common themes emerged, however, including an expectation that information will be exchanged rather than gathered anew, the need for incentives to promote information exchange, and concerns about data security and patient confidentiality. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ability to transfer health information to where it is most needed is nearly always mentioned as an advantage of HIE adoption, there are wide differences in the degree to which this has been achieved to support the scenarios used in this study. Nevertheless, these differences indicate varying stages of progress along a comparable pathway, with similar barriers being identified in the countries described. In some cases, these have been partially surmounted while elsewhere work is needed. We reflect on contextual factors influencing the status and direction of HIE efforts in different global regions and their implications for progress. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2019-12 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6815656/ /pubmed/31673351 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020427 Text en Copyright © 2019 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Payne, Thomas H
Lovis, Christian
Gutteridge, Charles
Pagliari, Claudia
Natarajan, Shivam
Yong, Cui
Zhao, Lue-Ping
Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries
title Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries
title_full Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries
title_fullStr Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries
title_full_unstemmed Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries
title_short Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries
title_sort status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673351
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020427
work_keys_str_mv AT paynethomash statusofhealthinformationexchangeacomparisonofsixcountries
AT lovischristian statusofhealthinformationexchangeacomparisonofsixcountries
AT gutteridgecharles statusofhealthinformationexchangeacomparisonofsixcountries
AT pagliariclaudia statusofhealthinformationexchangeacomparisonofsixcountries
AT natarajanshivam statusofhealthinformationexchangeacomparisonofsixcountries
AT yongcui statusofhealthinformationexchangeacomparisonofsixcountries
AT zhaolueping statusofhealthinformationexchangeacomparisonofsixcountries