Cargando…

Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a CHNRI exercise

BACKGROUND: Approximately 250 million children under the age of five in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) will not achieve their developmental potential due to poverty and stunting alone. Investments in programming to improve early childhood development (ECD) have the potential to disrupt the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomlinson, Mark, Darmstadt, Gary L, Yousafzai, Aisha K, Daelmans, Bernadette, Britto, Pia, Gordon, Sarah L, Tablante, Elizabeth, Dua, Tarun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673352
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020703
_version_ 1783463275125538816
author Tomlinson, Mark
Darmstadt, Gary L
Yousafzai, Aisha K
Daelmans, Bernadette
Britto, Pia
Gordon, Sarah L
Tablante, Elizabeth
Dua, Tarun
author_facet Tomlinson, Mark
Darmstadt, Gary L
Yousafzai, Aisha K
Daelmans, Bernadette
Britto, Pia
Gordon, Sarah L
Tablante, Elizabeth
Dua, Tarun
author_sort Tomlinson, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 250 million children under the age of five in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) will not achieve their developmental potential due to poverty and stunting alone. Investments in programming to improve early childhood development (ECD) have the potential to disrupt the cycle of poverty and therefore should be prioritised. Support for ECD has increased in recent years. Nevertheless, donors and policies continue to neglect ECD, in part from lack of evidence to guide policy makers and donors about where they should focus policies and programmes. Identification and investment in research is needed to overcome these constraints and in order to achieve high quality implementation of programmes to improve ECD. METHODS: The Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) priority setting methodology was applied in order to assess research priorities for improving ECD. A group of 348 global and local experts in ECD-related research were identified and invited to generate research questions. This resulted in 406 research questions which were categorised and refined by study investigators into 54 research questions across six thematic goals which were evaluated using five criteria: answerability, effectiveness, feasibility, impact, and effect on equity. Research options were ranked by their final research priority score multiplied by 100. RESULTS: The top three research priority options from the LMIC experts came from the third thematic goal of improving the impact of interventions, whereas the top three research priority options from high-income country experts came from different goals: improving the integration of interventions, increasing the understanding of health economics and social protection strategies, and improving the impact of interventions. CONCLUSION: The results of this process highlight that priorities for future research should focus on the need for services and support to parents to provide nurturing care, and the training of health workers and non-specialists in implementation of interventions to improve ECD. Three of the six thematic goals of the present priority setting centred on interventions (ie, improving impact, implementation of interventions and improving the integration of interventions). In order to achieve higher coverage through sustainable interventions to improve ECD with equitable reach, interventions should be integrated and not be sector driven.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Edinburgh University Global Health Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68158742019-10-31 Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a CHNRI exercise Tomlinson, Mark Darmstadt, Gary L Yousafzai, Aisha K Daelmans, Bernadette Britto, Pia Gordon, Sarah L Tablante, Elizabeth Dua, Tarun J Glob Health Research Theme 3: Global Health Research Priorities BACKGROUND: Approximately 250 million children under the age of five in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) will not achieve their developmental potential due to poverty and stunting alone. Investments in programming to improve early childhood development (ECD) have the potential to disrupt the cycle of poverty and therefore should be prioritised. Support for ECD has increased in recent years. Nevertheless, donors and policies continue to neglect ECD, in part from lack of evidence to guide policy makers and donors about where they should focus policies and programmes. Identification and investment in research is needed to overcome these constraints and in order to achieve high quality implementation of programmes to improve ECD. METHODS: The Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) priority setting methodology was applied in order to assess research priorities for improving ECD. A group of 348 global and local experts in ECD-related research were identified and invited to generate research questions. This resulted in 406 research questions which were categorised and refined by study investigators into 54 research questions across six thematic goals which were evaluated using five criteria: answerability, effectiveness, feasibility, impact, and effect on equity. Research options were ranked by their final research priority score multiplied by 100. RESULTS: The top three research priority options from the LMIC experts came from the third thematic goal of improving the impact of interventions, whereas the top three research priority options from high-income country experts came from different goals: improving the integration of interventions, increasing the understanding of health economics and social protection strategies, and improving the impact of interventions. CONCLUSION: The results of this process highlight that priorities for future research should focus on the need for services and support to parents to provide nurturing care, and the training of health workers and non-specialists in implementation of interventions to improve ECD. Three of the six thematic goals of the present priority setting centred on interventions (ie, improving impact, implementation of interventions and improving the integration of interventions). In order to achieve higher coverage through sustainable interventions to improve ECD with equitable reach, interventions should be integrated and not be sector driven. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2019-12 2019-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6815874/ /pubmed/31673352 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020703 Text en Copyright © 2019 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Theme 3: Global Health Research Priorities
Tomlinson, Mark
Darmstadt, Gary L
Yousafzai, Aisha K
Daelmans, Bernadette
Britto, Pia
Gordon, Sarah L
Tablante, Elizabeth
Dua, Tarun
Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a CHNRI exercise
title Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a CHNRI exercise
title_full Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a CHNRI exercise
title_fullStr Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a CHNRI exercise
title_full_unstemmed Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a CHNRI exercise
title_short Global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a CHNRI exercise
title_sort global research priorities to accelerate programming to improve early childhood development in the sustainable development era: a chnri exercise
topic Research Theme 3: Global Health Research Priorities
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673352
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020703
work_keys_str_mv AT tomlinsonmark globalresearchprioritiestoaccelerateprogrammingtoimproveearlychildhooddevelopmentinthesustainabledevelopmenteraachnriexercise
AT darmstadtgaryl globalresearchprioritiestoaccelerateprogrammingtoimproveearlychildhooddevelopmentinthesustainabledevelopmenteraachnriexercise
AT yousafzaiaishak globalresearchprioritiestoaccelerateprogrammingtoimproveearlychildhooddevelopmentinthesustainabledevelopmenteraachnriexercise
AT daelmansbernadette globalresearchprioritiestoaccelerateprogrammingtoimproveearlychildhooddevelopmentinthesustainabledevelopmenteraachnriexercise
AT brittopia globalresearchprioritiestoaccelerateprogrammingtoimproveearlychildhooddevelopmentinthesustainabledevelopmenteraachnriexercise
AT gordonsarahl globalresearchprioritiestoaccelerateprogrammingtoimproveearlychildhooddevelopmentinthesustainabledevelopmenteraachnriexercise
AT tablanteelizabeth globalresearchprioritiestoaccelerateprogrammingtoimproveearlychildhooddevelopmentinthesustainabledevelopmenteraachnriexercise
AT duatarun globalresearchprioritiestoaccelerateprogrammingtoimproveearlychildhooddevelopmentinthesustainabledevelopmenteraachnriexercise