Cargando…
Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis
Presently, bone marrow is considered as a prime source of mesenchymal stem cells; however, there are some drawbacks and limitations. Compared with other mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources, gingiva‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain through minimally invasive cell...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31657140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14632 |
_version_ | 1783463289795117056 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Quan Nakata, Hidemi Yamamoto, Maiko Kasugai, Shohei Kuroda, Shinji |
author_facet | Sun, Quan Nakata, Hidemi Yamamoto, Maiko Kasugai, Shohei Kuroda, Shinji |
author_sort | Sun, Quan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Presently, bone marrow is considered as a prime source of mesenchymal stem cells; however, there are some drawbacks and limitations. Compared with other mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources, gingiva‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain through minimally invasive cell isolation techniques. In this study, MSCs derived from gingiva and bone marrow were isolated and cultured from mice. GMSCs were characterized by osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation, and flow cytometry. Compared with bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs), the proliferation capacity was judged by CCK‐8 proliferation assay. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by ALP staining, ALP assay and Alizarin red staining. RT‐qPCR was performed for ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2. The results indicated that GMSCs showed higher proliferative capacity than BMSCs. GMSCs turned more positive for ALP and formed a more number of mineralized nodules than BMSCs after osteogenic induction. RT‐qPCR revealed that the expression of ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2 was significantly increased in the GMSCs compared with that in BMSCs. Moreover, it was found that the number of CD90‐positive cells in GMSCs elevated more than that of BMSCs during osteogenic induction. Taking these results together, it was indicated that GMSCs might be a promising source in the future bone tissue engineering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6815943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68159432019-11-01 Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis Sun, Quan Nakata, Hidemi Yamamoto, Maiko Kasugai, Shohei Kuroda, Shinji J Cell Mol Med Original Articles Presently, bone marrow is considered as a prime source of mesenchymal stem cells; however, there are some drawbacks and limitations. Compared with other mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources, gingiva‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain through minimally invasive cell isolation techniques. In this study, MSCs derived from gingiva and bone marrow were isolated and cultured from mice. GMSCs were characterized by osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation, and flow cytometry. Compared with bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs), the proliferation capacity was judged by CCK‐8 proliferation assay. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by ALP staining, ALP assay and Alizarin red staining. RT‐qPCR was performed for ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2. The results indicated that GMSCs showed higher proliferative capacity than BMSCs. GMSCs turned more positive for ALP and formed a more number of mineralized nodules than BMSCs after osteogenic induction. RT‐qPCR revealed that the expression of ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2 was significantly increased in the GMSCs compared with that in BMSCs. Moreover, it was found that the number of CD90‐positive cells in GMSCs elevated more than that of BMSCs during osteogenic induction. Taking these results together, it was indicated that GMSCs might be a promising source in the future bone tissue engineering. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-10 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6815943/ /pubmed/31657140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14632 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sun, Quan Nakata, Hidemi Yamamoto, Maiko Kasugai, Shohei Kuroda, Shinji Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis |
title | Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis |
title_full | Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis |
title_short | Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis |
title_sort | comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31657140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14632 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunquan comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis AT nakatahidemi comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis AT yamamotomaiko comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis AT kasugaishohei comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis AT kurodashinji comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis |