Cargando…

Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis

Presently, bone marrow is considered as a prime source of mesenchymal stem cells; however, there are some drawbacks and limitations. Compared with other mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources, gingiva‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain through minimally invasive cell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Quan, Nakata, Hidemi, Yamamoto, Maiko, Kasugai, Shohei, Kuroda, Shinji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31657140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14632
_version_ 1783463289795117056
author Sun, Quan
Nakata, Hidemi
Yamamoto, Maiko
Kasugai, Shohei
Kuroda, Shinji
author_facet Sun, Quan
Nakata, Hidemi
Yamamoto, Maiko
Kasugai, Shohei
Kuroda, Shinji
author_sort Sun, Quan
collection PubMed
description Presently, bone marrow is considered as a prime source of mesenchymal stem cells; however, there are some drawbacks and limitations. Compared with other mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources, gingiva‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain through minimally invasive cell isolation techniques. In this study, MSCs derived from gingiva and bone marrow were isolated and cultured from mice. GMSCs were characterized by osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation, and flow cytometry. Compared with bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs), the proliferation capacity was judged by CCK‐8 proliferation assay. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by ALP staining, ALP assay and Alizarin red staining. RT‐qPCR was performed for ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2. The results indicated that GMSCs showed higher proliferative capacity than BMSCs. GMSCs turned more positive for ALP and formed a more number of mineralized nodules than BMSCs after osteogenic induction. RT‐qPCR revealed that the expression of ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2 was significantly increased in the GMSCs compared with that in BMSCs. Moreover, it was found that the number of CD90‐positive cells in GMSCs elevated more than that of BMSCs during osteogenic induction. Taking these results together, it was indicated that GMSCs might be a promising source in the future bone tissue engineering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6815943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68159432019-11-01 Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis Sun, Quan Nakata, Hidemi Yamamoto, Maiko Kasugai, Shohei Kuroda, Shinji J Cell Mol Med Original Articles Presently, bone marrow is considered as a prime source of mesenchymal stem cells; however, there are some drawbacks and limitations. Compared with other mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources, gingiva‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain through minimally invasive cell isolation techniques. In this study, MSCs derived from gingiva and bone marrow were isolated and cultured from mice. GMSCs were characterized by osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation, and flow cytometry. Compared with bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs), the proliferation capacity was judged by CCK‐8 proliferation assay. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by ALP staining, ALP assay and Alizarin red staining. RT‐qPCR was performed for ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2. The results indicated that GMSCs showed higher proliferative capacity than BMSCs. GMSCs turned more positive for ALP and formed a more number of mineralized nodules than BMSCs after osteogenic induction. RT‐qPCR revealed that the expression of ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2 was significantly increased in the GMSCs compared with that in BMSCs. Moreover, it was found that the number of CD90‐positive cells in GMSCs elevated more than that of BMSCs during osteogenic induction. Taking these results together, it was indicated that GMSCs might be a promising source in the future bone tissue engineering. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-10 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6815943/ /pubmed/31657140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14632 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sun, Quan
Nakata, Hidemi
Yamamoto, Maiko
Kasugai, Shohei
Kuroda, Shinji
Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis
title Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis
title_full Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis
title_fullStr Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis
title_short Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis
title_sort comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31657140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14632
work_keys_str_mv AT sunquan comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis
AT nakatahidemi comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis
AT yamamotomaiko comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis
AT kasugaishohei comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis
AT kurodashinji comparisonofgingivaderivedandbonemarrowmesenchymalstemcellsforosteogenesis