Cargando…
Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential
Introduction: Preterm birth is a major global health concern, contributing to 35% of all neonatal deaths in 2016. Given the importance of accurately ascertaining estimates of preterm birth and in light of current limitations in postnatal gestational age (GA) estimation, novel methods of estimating G...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6816481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31422714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2019.1654863 |
_version_ | 1783463375053783040 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Lindsay A. Murphy, Malia SQ. Ducharme, Robin Denize, Kathryn Jadavji, Nafisa M. Potter, Beth Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Hawken, Steven Wilson, Kumanan |
author_facet | Wilson, Lindsay A. Murphy, Malia SQ. Ducharme, Robin Denize, Kathryn Jadavji, Nafisa M. Potter, Beth Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Hawken, Steven Wilson, Kumanan |
author_sort | Wilson, Lindsay A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Preterm birth is a major global health concern, contributing to 35% of all neonatal deaths in 2016. Given the importance of accurately ascertaining estimates of preterm birth and in light of current limitations in postnatal gestational age (GA) estimation, novel methods of estimating GA postnatally in the absence of prenatal ultrasound are needed. Previous work has demonstrated the potential for metabolomics to estimate GA by analyzing data captured through routine newborn screening. Areas covered: Circulating analytes found in newborn blood samples vary by GA. Leveraging newborn screening and demographic data, our group developed an algorithm capable of estimating GA postnatally to within approximately 1 week of ultrasound-validated GA. Since then, we have built on the model by including additional analytes and validating the model’s performance through internal and external validation studies, and through implementation of the model internationally. Expert opinion: Currently, using metabolomics to estimate GA postnatally holds considerable promise but is limited by issues of cost-effectiveness and resource access in low-income settings. Future work will focus on enhancing the precision of this approach while prioritizing point-of-care testing that is both accessible and acceptable to individuals in low-resource settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6816481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68164812019-11-07 Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential Wilson, Lindsay A. Murphy, Malia SQ. Ducharme, Robin Denize, Kathryn Jadavji, Nafisa M. Potter, Beth Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Hawken, Steven Wilson, Kumanan Expert Rev Proteomics Special Report Introduction: Preterm birth is a major global health concern, contributing to 35% of all neonatal deaths in 2016. Given the importance of accurately ascertaining estimates of preterm birth and in light of current limitations in postnatal gestational age (GA) estimation, novel methods of estimating GA postnatally in the absence of prenatal ultrasound are needed. Previous work has demonstrated the potential for metabolomics to estimate GA by analyzing data captured through routine newborn screening. Areas covered: Circulating analytes found in newborn blood samples vary by GA. Leveraging newborn screening and demographic data, our group developed an algorithm capable of estimating GA postnatally to within approximately 1 week of ultrasound-validated GA. Since then, we have built on the model by including additional analytes and validating the model’s performance through internal and external validation studies, and through implementation of the model internationally. Expert opinion: Currently, using metabolomics to estimate GA postnatally holds considerable promise but is limited by issues of cost-effectiveness and resource access in low-income settings. Future work will focus on enhancing the precision of this approach while prioritizing point-of-care testing that is both accessible and acceptable to individuals in low-resource settings. Taylor & Francis 2019-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6816481/ /pubmed/31422714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2019.1654863 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Report Wilson, Lindsay A. Murphy, Malia SQ. Ducharme, Robin Denize, Kathryn Jadavji, Nafisa M. Potter, Beth Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Hawken, Steven Wilson, Kumanan Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential |
title | Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential |
title_full | Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential |
title_fullStr | Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential |
title_full_unstemmed | Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential |
title_short | Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential |
title_sort | postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential |
topic | Special Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6816481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31422714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2019.1654863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonlindsaya postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT murphymaliasq postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT ducharmerobin postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT denizekathryn postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT jadavjinafisam postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT potterbeth postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT littlejulian postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT chakrabortypranesh postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT hawkensteven postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential AT wilsonkumanan postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential |