Cargando…

Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential

Introduction: Preterm birth is a major global health concern, contributing to 35% of all neonatal deaths in 2016. Given the importance of accurately ascertaining estimates of preterm birth and in light of current limitations in postnatal gestational age (GA) estimation, novel methods of estimating G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Lindsay A., Murphy, Malia SQ., Ducharme, Robin, Denize, Kathryn, Jadavji, Nafisa M., Potter, Beth, Little, Julian, Chakraborty, Pranesh, Hawken, Steven, Wilson, Kumanan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6816481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31422714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2019.1654863
_version_ 1783463375053783040
author Wilson, Lindsay A.
Murphy, Malia SQ.
Ducharme, Robin
Denize, Kathryn
Jadavji, Nafisa M.
Potter, Beth
Little, Julian
Chakraborty, Pranesh
Hawken, Steven
Wilson, Kumanan
author_facet Wilson, Lindsay A.
Murphy, Malia SQ.
Ducharme, Robin
Denize, Kathryn
Jadavji, Nafisa M.
Potter, Beth
Little, Julian
Chakraborty, Pranesh
Hawken, Steven
Wilson, Kumanan
author_sort Wilson, Lindsay A.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Preterm birth is a major global health concern, contributing to 35% of all neonatal deaths in 2016. Given the importance of accurately ascertaining estimates of preterm birth and in light of current limitations in postnatal gestational age (GA) estimation, novel methods of estimating GA postnatally in the absence of prenatal ultrasound are needed. Previous work has demonstrated the potential for metabolomics to estimate GA by analyzing data captured through routine newborn screening. Areas covered: Circulating analytes found in newborn blood samples vary by GA. Leveraging newborn screening and demographic data, our group developed an algorithm capable of estimating GA postnatally to within approximately 1 week of ultrasound-validated GA. Since then, we have built on the model by including additional analytes and validating the model’s performance through internal and external validation studies, and through implementation of the model internationally. Expert opinion: Currently, using metabolomics to estimate GA postnatally holds considerable promise but is limited by issues of cost-effectiveness and resource access in low-income settings. Future work will focus on enhancing the precision of this approach while prioritizing point-of-care testing that is both accessible and acceptable to individuals in low-resource settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6816481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68164812019-11-07 Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential Wilson, Lindsay A. Murphy, Malia SQ. Ducharme, Robin Denize, Kathryn Jadavji, Nafisa M. Potter, Beth Little, Julian Chakraborty, Pranesh Hawken, Steven Wilson, Kumanan Expert Rev Proteomics Special Report Introduction: Preterm birth is a major global health concern, contributing to 35% of all neonatal deaths in 2016. Given the importance of accurately ascertaining estimates of preterm birth and in light of current limitations in postnatal gestational age (GA) estimation, novel methods of estimating GA postnatally in the absence of prenatal ultrasound are needed. Previous work has demonstrated the potential for metabolomics to estimate GA by analyzing data captured through routine newborn screening. Areas covered: Circulating analytes found in newborn blood samples vary by GA. Leveraging newborn screening and demographic data, our group developed an algorithm capable of estimating GA postnatally to within approximately 1 week of ultrasound-validated GA. Since then, we have built on the model by including additional analytes and validating the model’s performance through internal and external validation studies, and through implementation of the model internationally. Expert opinion: Currently, using metabolomics to estimate GA postnatally holds considerable promise but is limited by issues of cost-effectiveness and resource access in low-income settings. Future work will focus on enhancing the precision of this approach while prioritizing point-of-care testing that is both accessible and acceptable to individuals in low-resource settings. Taylor & Francis 2019-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6816481/ /pubmed/31422714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2019.1654863 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Report
Wilson, Lindsay A.
Murphy, Malia SQ.
Ducharme, Robin
Denize, Kathryn
Jadavji, Nafisa M.
Potter, Beth
Little, Julian
Chakraborty, Pranesh
Hawken, Steven
Wilson, Kumanan
Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential
title Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential
title_full Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential
title_fullStr Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential
title_full_unstemmed Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential
title_short Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential
title_sort postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential
topic Special Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6816481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31422714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2019.1654863
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonlindsaya postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT murphymaliasq postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT ducharmerobin postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT denizekathryn postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT jadavjinafisam postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT potterbeth postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT littlejulian postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT chakrabortypranesh postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT hawkensteven postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential
AT wilsonkumanan postnatalgestationalageestimationvianewbornscreeninganalysisapplicationandpotential