Cargando…

Can Information Change Public Support for Aid?

Donor country publics typically know little about how much aid their governments give. This paper reports on three experiments conducted in Australia designed to study whether providing accurate information on government giving changes people’s views about aid. Treating participants by showing them...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wood, Terence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1493194
_version_ 1783463405875625984
author Wood, Terence
author_facet Wood, Terence
author_sort Wood, Terence
collection PubMed
description Donor country publics typically know little about how much aid their governments give. This paper reports on three experiments conducted in Australia designed to study whether providing accurate information on government giving changes people’s views about aid. Treating participants by showing them how little Australia gives or by showing declining generosity has little effect. However, contrasting Australian aid cuts with increases in the United Kingdom raises support for aid substantially. Motivated reasoning likely explains the broad absence of findings in the first two treatments. Concern with international norms and perceptions likely explains the efficacy of the third treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6817318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68173182019-11-07 Can Information Change Public Support for Aid? Wood, Terence J Dev Stud Articles Donor country publics typically know little about how much aid their governments give. This paper reports on three experiments conducted in Australia designed to study whether providing accurate information on government giving changes people’s views about aid. Treating participants by showing them how little Australia gives or by showing declining generosity has little effect. However, contrasting Australian aid cuts with increases in the United Kingdom raises support for aid substantially. Motivated reasoning likely explains the broad absence of findings in the first two treatments. Concern with international norms and perceptions likely explains the efficacy of the third treatment. Routledge 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6817318/ /pubmed/31708592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1493194 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Wood, Terence
Can Information Change Public Support for Aid?
title Can Information Change Public Support for Aid?
title_full Can Information Change Public Support for Aid?
title_fullStr Can Information Change Public Support for Aid?
title_full_unstemmed Can Information Change Public Support for Aid?
title_short Can Information Change Public Support for Aid?
title_sort can information change public support for aid?
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1493194
work_keys_str_mv AT woodterence caninformationchangepublicsupportforaid