Cargando…

A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) versus low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for localized prostate cancer in a multi-institutional phase 2 randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with favorable-risk prostate cancer were randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hathout, Lara, Mahmoud, Omar, Wang, Yaqun, Vergalasova, Irina, Barkati, Maroie, Després, Philippe, Martin, André-Guy, Foster, William, Lacroix, Frédéric, Delouya, Guila, Taussky, Daniel, Morton, Gerard, Vigneault, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.04.003
_version_ 1783463441979146240
author Hathout, Lara
Mahmoud, Omar
Wang, Yaqun
Vergalasova, Irina
Barkati, Maroie
Després, Philippe
Martin, André-Guy
Foster, William
Lacroix, Frédéric
Delouya, Guila
Taussky, Daniel
Morton, Gerard
Vigneault, Eric
author_facet Hathout, Lara
Mahmoud, Omar
Wang, Yaqun
Vergalasova, Irina
Barkati, Maroie
Després, Philippe
Martin, André-Guy
Foster, William
Lacroix, Frédéric
Delouya, Guila
Taussky, Daniel
Morton, Gerard
Vigneault, Eric
author_sort Hathout, Lara
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) versus low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for localized prostate cancer in a multi-institutional phase 2 randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with favorable-risk prostate cancer were randomized between monotherapy brachytherapy with either Iodine-125 LDRB to 144 Gy or single-fraction Iridium-192 HDRB to 19 Gy. HRQOL and urinary toxicity were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 scoring and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Independent samples t test and mixed effects modeling were performed for continuous variables. Time to IPSS resolution, defined as return to its baseline score ±5 points, was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimator curves with the log-rank test. A multiple-comparison adjusted P value of ≤.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: LDRB and HDRB were performed in 15 and 16 patients, respectively, for a total of 31 patients. At 3 months, patients treated with LDRB had a higher IPSS score (mean, 15.5 vs 6.0, respectively; P = .003) and lower EPIC urinary irritative score (mean, 69.2 vs 85.3, respectively; P = .037) compared with those who received HDRB. On repeated measures at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, the IPSS (P = .003) and EPIC urinary irritative scores (P = .019) were significantly better in the HDR arm, translating into a lower urinary toxicity profile. There were no significant differences in the EPIC urinary incontinence, sexual, or bowel habit scores between the 2 groups at any measured time point. Time to IPSS resolution was significantly shorter in the HDRB group (mean, 2.0 months) compared with the LDRB group (mean, 6.0 months; P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: HDRB monotherapy is a promising modality associated with a lower urinary toxicity profile and higher HRQOL in the first 12 months compared with LDRB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6817536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68175362019-10-31 A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer Hathout, Lara Mahmoud, Omar Wang, Yaqun Vergalasova, Irina Barkati, Maroie Després, Philippe Martin, André-Guy Foster, William Lacroix, Frédéric Delouya, Guila Taussky, Daniel Morton, Gerard Vigneault, Eric Adv Radiat Oncol Genitourinary Cancer PURPOSE: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) versus low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRB) for localized prostate cancer in a multi-institutional phase 2 randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with favorable-risk prostate cancer were randomized between monotherapy brachytherapy with either Iodine-125 LDRB to 144 Gy or single-fraction Iridium-192 HDRB to 19 Gy. HRQOL and urinary toxicity were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 scoring and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Independent samples t test and mixed effects modeling were performed for continuous variables. Time to IPSS resolution, defined as return to its baseline score ±5 points, was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimator curves with the log-rank test. A multiple-comparison adjusted P value of ≤.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: LDRB and HDRB were performed in 15 and 16 patients, respectively, for a total of 31 patients. At 3 months, patients treated with LDRB had a higher IPSS score (mean, 15.5 vs 6.0, respectively; P = .003) and lower EPIC urinary irritative score (mean, 69.2 vs 85.3, respectively; P = .037) compared with those who received HDRB. On repeated measures at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, the IPSS (P = .003) and EPIC urinary irritative scores (P = .019) were significantly better in the HDR arm, translating into a lower urinary toxicity profile. There were no significant differences in the EPIC urinary incontinence, sexual, or bowel habit scores between the 2 groups at any measured time point. Time to IPSS resolution was significantly shorter in the HDRB group (mean, 2.0 months) compared with the LDRB group (mean, 6.0 months; P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: HDRB monotherapy is a promising modality associated with a lower urinary toxicity profile and higher HRQOL in the first 12 months compared with LDRB. Elsevier 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6817536/ /pubmed/31673656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.04.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Genitourinary Cancer
Hathout, Lara
Mahmoud, Omar
Wang, Yaqun
Vergalasova, Irina
Barkati, Maroie
Després, Philippe
Martin, André-Guy
Foster, William
Lacroix, Frédéric
Delouya, Guila
Taussky, Daniel
Morton, Gerard
Vigneault, Eric
A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
title A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_short A Phase 2 Randomized Pilot Study Comparing High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
title_sort phase 2 randomized pilot study comparing high-dose-rate brachytherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy in localized prostate cancer
topic Genitourinary Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.04.003
work_keys_str_mv AT hathoutlara aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT mahmoudomar aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT wangyaqun aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT vergalasovairina aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT barkatimaroie aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT despresphilippe aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT martinandreguy aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT fosterwilliam aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT lacroixfrederic aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT delouyaguila aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT tausskydaniel aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT mortongerard aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT vigneaulteric aphase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT hathoutlara phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT mahmoudomar phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT wangyaqun phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT vergalasovairina phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT barkatimaroie phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT despresphilippe phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT martinandreguy phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT fosterwilliam phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT lacroixfrederic phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT delouyaguila phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT tausskydaniel phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT mortongerard phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer
AT vigneaulteric phase2randomizedpilotstudycomparinghighdoseratebrachytherapyandlowdoseratebrachytherapyasmonotherapyinlocalizedprostatecancer