Cargando…

Potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations

OBJECTIVE: Intra-uterine insemination (IUI) is widely used for different indications. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of intra-uterine insemination as a function of indication and origin of the inseminated spermatozoa. STUDY DESIGN: The retrospective study involved 827 fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreau, Jessika, Gatimel, Nicolas, Simon, Cynthia, Cohade, Clémentine, Lesourd, Florence, Parinaud, Jean, Léandri, Roger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100058
_version_ 1783463470922989568
author Moreau, Jessika
Gatimel, Nicolas
Simon, Cynthia
Cohade, Clémentine
Lesourd, Florence
Parinaud, Jean
Léandri, Roger
author_facet Moreau, Jessika
Gatimel, Nicolas
Simon, Cynthia
Cohade, Clémentine
Lesourd, Florence
Parinaud, Jean
Léandri, Roger
author_sort Moreau, Jessika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Intra-uterine insemination (IUI) is widely used for different indications. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of intra-uterine insemination as a function of indication and origin of the inseminated spermatozoa. STUDY DESIGN: The retrospective study involved 827 first attempts of IUI in 827 couples between January 2011 and July 2017 in the Toulouse university hospital. Of these, 642 used fresh sperm from the husband, 40 frozen sperm from the husband and 145 frozen sperm from donors. The measured outcome parameter was live birth rate per attempt. RESULTS: When comparing couples lacking functional gametes (due to male or female causes), to couples who could potentially conceive spontaneously, i.e. subfertile, the latter were found to have a significantly lower live birth rate (18% vs 26%; P < 0.05). Even when adjusted for demographic parameters, which differed significantly between the 2 groups (female age, percentage of women suffering from primary infertility, BMI, number of inseminated motile spermatozoa and stimulation duration), this difference remained statistically significant (OR = 0.639 [0.425-0.961]; P = 0.0316). CONCLUSION: When compared to couples lacking functional gametes, subfertile couples have poor IUI outcomes, suggesting a hidden cause of infertility, despite no apparent differences in ovarian reserve, tubal potency, results of ovarian stimulation and normal conventional sperm parameters. Further studies are required to better characterise and identify this subgroup of women with poor IUI outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6817667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68176672019-10-31 Potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations Moreau, Jessika Gatimel, Nicolas Simon, Cynthia Cohade, Clémentine Lesourd, Florence Parinaud, Jean Léandri, Roger Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: Intra-uterine insemination (IUI) is widely used for different indications. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of intra-uterine insemination as a function of indication and origin of the inseminated spermatozoa. STUDY DESIGN: The retrospective study involved 827 first attempts of IUI in 827 couples between January 2011 and July 2017 in the Toulouse university hospital. Of these, 642 used fresh sperm from the husband, 40 frozen sperm from the husband and 145 frozen sperm from donors. The measured outcome parameter was live birth rate per attempt. RESULTS: When comparing couples lacking functional gametes (due to male or female causes), to couples who could potentially conceive spontaneously, i.e. subfertile, the latter were found to have a significantly lower live birth rate (18% vs 26%; P < 0.05). Even when adjusted for demographic parameters, which differed significantly between the 2 groups (female age, percentage of women suffering from primary infertility, BMI, number of inseminated motile spermatozoa and stimulation duration), this difference remained statistically significant (OR = 0.639 [0.425-0.961]; P = 0.0316). CONCLUSION: When compared to couples lacking functional gametes, subfertile couples have poor IUI outcomes, suggesting a hidden cause of infertility, despite no apparent differences in ovarian reserve, tubal potency, results of ovarian stimulation and normal conventional sperm parameters. Further studies are required to better characterise and identify this subgroup of women with poor IUI outcomes. Elsevier 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6817667/ /pubmed/31673689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100058 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology
Moreau, Jessika
Gatimel, Nicolas
Simon, Cynthia
Cohade, Clémentine
Lesourd, Florence
Parinaud, Jean
Léandri, Roger
Potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations
title Potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations
title_full Potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations
title_fullStr Potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations
title_full_unstemmed Potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations
title_short Potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations
title_sort potential chances for natural fertility influence results of intrauterine inseminations
topic Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31673689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100058
work_keys_str_mv AT moreaujessika potentialchancesfornaturalfertilityinfluenceresultsofintrauterineinseminations
AT gatimelnicolas potentialchancesfornaturalfertilityinfluenceresultsofintrauterineinseminations
AT simoncynthia potentialchancesfornaturalfertilityinfluenceresultsofintrauterineinseminations
AT cohadeclementine potentialchancesfornaturalfertilityinfluenceresultsofintrauterineinseminations
AT lesourdflorence potentialchancesfornaturalfertilityinfluenceresultsofintrauterineinseminations
AT parinaudjean potentialchancesfornaturalfertilityinfluenceresultsofintrauterineinseminations
AT leandriroger potentialchancesfornaturalfertilityinfluenceresultsofintrauterineinseminations