Cargando…

Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica

Sciatica impacts on the ability to work and may lead to a reduced return to work. This study reviewed and summarised prognostic factors of work participation in patients who received conservative or surgical treatment for clinically diagnosed sciatica. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oosterhuis, Teddy, Smaardijk, Veerle R, Kuijer, P Paul FM, Langendam, Miranda W, Frings-Dresen, Monique H W, Hoving, Jan L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105797
_version_ 1783463537602985984
author Oosterhuis, Teddy
Smaardijk, Veerle R
Kuijer, P Paul FM
Langendam, Miranda W
Frings-Dresen, Monique H W
Hoving, Jan L
author_facet Oosterhuis, Teddy
Smaardijk, Veerle R
Kuijer, P Paul FM
Langendam, Miranda W
Frings-Dresen, Monique H W
Hoving, Jan L
author_sort Oosterhuis, Teddy
collection PubMed
description Sciatica impacts on the ability to work and may lead to a reduced return to work. This study reviewed and summarised prognostic factors of work participation in patients who received conservative or surgical treatment for clinically diagnosed sciatica. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO until January 2018. Cohort studies, using a measure of work participation as outcome, were included. Two independent reviewers performed study inclusion and used the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool for risk of bias assessment and GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Based on seven studies describing six cohorts (n=1408 patients) that assessed 21 potential prognostic factors, favourable factors for return to work (follow-up ranging from 3 months to 10 years) included younger age, better general health, less low back pain or sciatica bothersomeness, better physical function, negative straight leg raise-test, physician expecting surgery to be beneficial, better pain coping, less depression and mental stress, less fear of movement and low physical work load. Study results could not be pooled. Using GRADE, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low, with downgrading mainly for a high risk of bias and imprecision. Several prognostic factors like pain, disability and psychological factors were identified and reviewed, and these could be targeted using additional interventions to optimise return to work. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016042497.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6817989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68179892019-11-12 Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica Oosterhuis, Teddy Smaardijk, Veerle R Kuijer, P Paul FM Langendam, Miranda W Frings-Dresen, Monique H W Hoving, Jan L Occup Environ Med Review Sciatica impacts on the ability to work and may lead to a reduced return to work. This study reviewed and summarised prognostic factors of work participation in patients who received conservative or surgical treatment for clinically diagnosed sciatica. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO until January 2018. Cohort studies, using a measure of work participation as outcome, were included. Two independent reviewers performed study inclusion and used the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool for risk of bias assessment and GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Based on seven studies describing six cohorts (n=1408 patients) that assessed 21 potential prognostic factors, favourable factors for return to work (follow-up ranging from 3 months to 10 years) included younger age, better general health, less low back pain or sciatica bothersomeness, better physical function, negative straight leg raise-test, physician expecting surgery to be beneficial, better pain coping, less depression and mental stress, less fear of movement and low physical work load. Study results could not be pooled. Using GRADE, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low, with downgrading mainly for a high risk of bias and imprecision. Several prognostic factors like pain, disability and psychological factors were identified and reviewed, and these could be targeted using additional interventions to optimise return to work. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016042497. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6817989/ /pubmed/31296665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105797 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Oosterhuis, Teddy
Smaardijk, Veerle R
Kuijer, P Paul FM
Langendam, Miranda W
Frings-Dresen, Monique H W
Hoving, Jan L
Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
title Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
title_full Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
title_fullStr Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
title_short Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
title_sort systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105797
work_keys_str_mv AT oosterhuisteddy systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica
AT smaardijkveerler systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica
AT kuijerppaulfm systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica
AT langendammirandaw systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica
AT fringsdresenmoniquehw systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica
AT hovingjanl systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica