Cargando…
Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
Sciatica impacts on the ability to work and may lead to a reduced return to work. This study reviewed and summarised prognostic factors of work participation in patients who received conservative or surgical treatment for clinically diagnosed sciatica. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINF...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105797 |
_version_ | 1783463537602985984 |
---|---|
author | Oosterhuis, Teddy Smaardijk, Veerle R Kuijer, P Paul FM Langendam, Miranda W Frings-Dresen, Monique H W Hoving, Jan L |
author_facet | Oosterhuis, Teddy Smaardijk, Veerle R Kuijer, P Paul FM Langendam, Miranda W Frings-Dresen, Monique H W Hoving, Jan L |
author_sort | Oosterhuis, Teddy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sciatica impacts on the ability to work and may lead to a reduced return to work. This study reviewed and summarised prognostic factors of work participation in patients who received conservative or surgical treatment for clinically diagnosed sciatica. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO until January 2018. Cohort studies, using a measure of work participation as outcome, were included. Two independent reviewers performed study inclusion and used the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool for risk of bias assessment and GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Based on seven studies describing six cohorts (n=1408 patients) that assessed 21 potential prognostic factors, favourable factors for return to work (follow-up ranging from 3 months to 10 years) included younger age, better general health, less low back pain or sciatica bothersomeness, better physical function, negative straight leg raise-test, physician expecting surgery to be beneficial, better pain coping, less depression and mental stress, less fear of movement and low physical work load. Study results could not be pooled. Using GRADE, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low, with downgrading mainly for a high risk of bias and imprecision. Several prognostic factors like pain, disability and psychological factors were identified and reviewed, and these could be targeted using additional interventions to optimise return to work. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016042497. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6817989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68179892019-11-12 Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica Oosterhuis, Teddy Smaardijk, Veerle R Kuijer, P Paul FM Langendam, Miranda W Frings-Dresen, Monique H W Hoving, Jan L Occup Environ Med Review Sciatica impacts on the ability to work and may lead to a reduced return to work. This study reviewed and summarised prognostic factors of work participation in patients who received conservative or surgical treatment for clinically diagnosed sciatica. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO until January 2018. Cohort studies, using a measure of work participation as outcome, were included. Two independent reviewers performed study inclusion and used the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool for risk of bias assessment and GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Based on seven studies describing six cohorts (n=1408 patients) that assessed 21 potential prognostic factors, favourable factors for return to work (follow-up ranging from 3 months to 10 years) included younger age, better general health, less low back pain or sciatica bothersomeness, better physical function, negative straight leg raise-test, physician expecting surgery to be beneficial, better pain coping, less depression and mental stress, less fear of movement and low physical work load. Study results could not be pooled. Using GRADE, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low, with downgrading mainly for a high risk of bias and imprecision. Several prognostic factors like pain, disability and psychological factors were identified and reviewed, and these could be targeted using additional interventions to optimise return to work. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016042497. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-10 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6817989/ /pubmed/31296665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105797 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Oosterhuis, Teddy Smaardijk, Veerle R Kuijer, P Paul FM Langendam, Miranda W Frings-Dresen, Monique H W Hoving, Jan L Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica |
title | Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica |
title_full | Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica |
title_short | Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica |
title_sort | systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6817989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105797 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oosterhuisteddy systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica AT smaardijkveerler systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica AT kuijerppaulfm systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica AT langendammirandaw systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica AT fringsdresenmoniquehw systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica AT hovingjanl systematicreviewofprognosticfactorsforworkparticipationinpatientswithsciatica |