Cargando…
The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review
Background: Non-medical switching (NMS) is defined as switching to a clinically similar but chemically distinct medication for reasons apart from lack of effectiveness, tolerability or adherence. Objective: To update a prior systematic review evaluating the impact of NMS on outcomes. Data sources: A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563 |
_version_ | 1783463558255738880 |
---|---|
author | Weeda, Erin R. Nguyen, Elaine Martin, Silas Ingham, Michael Sobieraj, Diana M. Bookhart, Brahim K. Coleman, Craig I. |
author_facet | Weeda, Erin R. Nguyen, Elaine Martin, Silas Ingham, Michael Sobieraj, Diana M. Bookhart, Brahim K. Coleman, Craig I. |
author_sort | Weeda, Erin R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Non-medical switching (NMS) is defined as switching to a clinically similar but chemically distinct medication for reasons apart from lack of effectiveness, tolerability or adherence. Objective: To update a prior systematic review evaluating the impact of NMS on outcomes. Data sources: An updated search through 10/1/2018 in Medline and Web of Science was performed. Study selection: We included studies evaluating ≥25 patients and measuring the impact of NMS of drugs on ≥1 endpoint. Data extraction: The direction of association between NMS and endpoints was classified as negative, positive or neutral. Data synthesis: Thirty-eight studies contributed 154 endpoints. The direction of association was negative (n = 48; 31.2%) or neutral (n = 91; 59.1%) more often than it was positive (n = 15; 9.7%). Stratified by endpoint type, NMS was associated with a negative impact on clinical, economic, health-care utilization and medication-taking behavior in 26.9%,41.7%,30.3% and 75.0% of cases; with a positive effect seen in 3.0% (resource utilization) to 14.0% (clinical) of endpoints. Of the 92 endpoints from studies performed by the entity dictating the NMS, 88.0%were neutral or positive; whereas, only 40.3%of endpoints from studies conducted separately from the interested entity were neutral or positive. Conclusions: NMS was commonly associated with negative or neutral endpoints and was seldom associated with positive ones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6818107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68181072019-11-05 The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review Weeda, Erin R. Nguyen, Elaine Martin, Silas Ingham, Michael Sobieraj, Diana M. Bookhart, Brahim K. Coleman, Craig I. J Mark Access Health Policy Original Research Article Background: Non-medical switching (NMS) is defined as switching to a clinically similar but chemically distinct medication for reasons apart from lack of effectiveness, tolerability or adherence. Objective: To update a prior systematic review evaluating the impact of NMS on outcomes. Data sources: An updated search through 10/1/2018 in Medline and Web of Science was performed. Study selection: We included studies evaluating ≥25 patients and measuring the impact of NMS of drugs on ≥1 endpoint. Data extraction: The direction of association between NMS and endpoints was classified as negative, positive or neutral. Data synthesis: Thirty-eight studies contributed 154 endpoints. The direction of association was negative (n = 48; 31.2%) or neutral (n = 91; 59.1%) more often than it was positive (n = 15; 9.7%). Stratified by endpoint type, NMS was associated with a negative impact on clinical, economic, health-care utilization and medication-taking behavior in 26.9%,41.7%,30.3% and 75.0% of cases; with a positive effect seen in 3.0% (resource utilization) to 14.0% (clinical) of endpoints. Of the 92 endpoints from studies performed by the entity dictating the NMS, 88.0%were neutral or positive; whereas, only 40.3%of endpoints from studies conducted separately from the interested entity were neutral or positive. Conclusions: NMS was commonly associated with negative or neutral endpoints and was seldom associated with positive ones. Routledge 2019-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6818107/ /pubmed/31692904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Weeda, Erin R. Nguyen, Elaine Martin, Silas Ingham, Michael Sobieraj, Diana M. Bookhart, Brahim K. Coleman, Craig I. The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review |
title | The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review |
title_full | The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review |
title_short | The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review |
title_sort | impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weedaerinr theimpactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT nguyenelaine theimpactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT martinsilas theimpactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT inghammichael theimpactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT sobierajdianam theimpactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT bookhartbrahimk theimpactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT colemancraigi theimpactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT weedaerinr impactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT nguyenelaine impactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT martinsilas impactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT inghammichael impactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT sobierajdianam impactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT bookhartbrahimk impactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview AT colemancraigi impactofnonmedicalswitchingamongambulatorypatientsanupdatedsystematicliteraturereview |