Cargando…

The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of the compartmental diffusion measurement. METHODS: Two identical whipping cream phantoms and two healthy Sprague–Dawley rats were scanned on a 7T MR scanner, each repeated for three times. Diffusion weighted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yao-Liang, Lin, Yu-Jen, Lin, Sung-Han, Tsai, Chih-Chien, Lin, Yu-Chun, Cheng, Jur-Shan, Wang, Jiun-Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chang Gung University 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31627869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.03.002
_version_ 1783463572849819648
author Chen, Yao-Liang
Lin, Yu-Jen
Lin, Sung-Han
Tsai, Chih-Chien
Lin, Yu-Chun
Cheng, Jur-Shan
Wang, Jiun-Jie
author_facet Chen, Yao-Liang
Lin, Yu-Jen
Lin, Sung-Han
Tsai, Chih-Chien
Lin, Yu-Chun
Cheng, Jur-Shan
Wang, Jiun-Jie
author_sort Chen, Yao-Liang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of the compartmental diffusion measurement. METHODS: Two identical whipping cream phantoms and two healthy Sprague–Dawley rats were scanned on a 7T MR scanner, each repeated for three times. Diffusion weighted images were acquired along 30 non-collinear gradient directions, each with four b-values of 750, 1500, 2250 and 3000 s/mm(2). Slice thickness and field of view were used to create different combinations of voxel sizes, varied between 1.210 and 2.366 mm(3) in phantom and 0.200–0.303 mm(3) in rat brains. Multiple averages were used to achieve a controlled signal to noise ratio. RESULTS: Diffusion imaging showed good stability throughout the range of voxel sizes acquired from either the cream phantom or the rat, when the signal to noise ratio is controlled. The reproducibility analysis showed the within-subject coefficient of variation varied between 0.88% and 6.99% for phantom and 0.69%–6.19% for rat. Diffusion imaging is stable among different voxel sizes in 3 aspects: A. from both compartments in phantom and in the rat; B. in measurement of diffusivity and kurtosis and C. along axial, radial and averaged in all directions. CONCLUSION: Diffusion imaging in a heterogeneous but isotropic phantom and in vivo is consistent within the range of spatial resolution in preclinical use and when the signal to noise ratio is fixed. The result is reproducible for repeated measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6818162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Chang Gung University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68181622019-11-04 The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio Chen, Yao-Liang Lin, Yu-Jen Lin, Sung-Han Tsai, Chih-Chien Lin, Yu-Chun Cheng, Jur-Shan Wang, Jiun-Jie Biomed J Original article BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of the compartmental diffusion measurement. METHODS: Two identical whipping cream phantoms and two healthy Sprague–Dawley rats were scanned on a 7T MR scanner, each repeated for three times. Diffusion weighted images were acquired along 30 non-collinear gradient directions, each with four b-values of 750, 1500, 2250 and 3000 s/mm(2). Slice thickness and field of view were used to create different combinations of voxel sizes, varied between 1.210 and 2.366 mm(3) in phantom and 0.200–0.303 mm(3) in rat brains. Multiple averages were used to achieve a controlled signal to noise ratio. RESULTS: Diffusion imaging showed good stability throughout the range of voxel sizes acquired from either the cream phantom or the rat, when the signal to noise ratio is controlled. The reproducibility analysis showed the within-subject coefficient of variation varied between 0.88% and 6.99% for phantom and 0.69%–6.19% for rat. Diffusion imaging is stable among different voxel sizes in 3 aspects: A. from both compartments in phantom and in the rat; B. in measurement of diffusivity and kurtosis and C. along axial, radial and averaged in all directions. CONCLUSION: Diffusion imaging in a heterogeneous but isotropic phantom and in vivo is consistent within the range of spatial resolution in preclinical use and when the signal to noise ratio is fixed. The result is reproducible for repeated measurements. Chang Gung University 2019-08 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6818162/ /pubmed/31627869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.03.002 Text en © 2019 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Chen, Yao-Liang
Lin, Yu-Jen
Lin, Sung-Han
Tsai, Chih-Chien
Lin, Yu-Chun
Cheng, Jur-Shan
Wang, Jiun-Jie
The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio
title The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio
title_full The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio
title_fullStr The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio
title_full_unstemmed The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio
title_short The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio
title_sort effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31627869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.03.002
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyaoliang theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT linyujen theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT linsunghan theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT tsaichihchien theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT linyuchun theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT chengjurshan theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT wangjiunjie theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT chenyaoliang effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT linyujen effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT linsunghan effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT tsaichihchien effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT linyuchun effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT chengjurshan effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio
AT wangjiunjie effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio