Cargando…
The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of the compartmental diffusion measurement. METHODS: Two identical whipping cream phantoms and two healthy Sprague–Dawley rats were scanned on a 7T MR scanner, each repeated for three times. Diffusion weighted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chang Gung University
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31627869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.03.002 |
_version_ | 1783463572849819648 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yao-Liang Lin, Yu-Jen Lin, Sung-Han Tsai, Chih-Chien Lin, Yu-Chun Cheng, Jur-Shan Wang, Jiun-Jie |
author_facet | Chen, Yao-Liang Lin, Yu-Jen Lin, Sung-Han Tsai, Chih-Chien Lin, Yu-Chun Cheng, Jur-Shan Wang, Jiun-Jie |
author_sort | Chen, Yao-Liang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of the compartmental diffusion measurement. METHODS: Two identical whipping cream phantoms and two healthy Sprague–Dawley rats were scanned on a 7T MR scanner, each repeated for three times. Diffusion weighted images were acquired along 30 non-collinear gradient directions, each with four b-values of 750, 1500, 2250 and 3000 s/mm(2). Slice thickness and field of view were used to create different combinations of voxel sizes, varied between 1.210 and 2.366 mm(3) in phantom and 0.200–0.303 mm(3) in rat brains. Multiple averages were used to achieve a controlled signal to noise ratio. RESULTS: Diffusion imaging showed good stability throughout the range of voxel sizes acquired from either the cream phantom or the rat, when the signal to noise ratio is controlled. The reproducibility analysis showed the within-subject coefficient of variation varied between 0.88% and 6.99% for phantom and 0.69%–6.19% for rat. Diffusion imaging is stable among different voxel sizes in 3 aspects: A. from both compartments in phantom and in the rat; B. in measurement of diffusivity and kurtosis and C. along axial, radial and averaged in all directions. CONCLUSION: Diffusion imaging in a heterogeneous but isotropic phantom and in vivo is consistent within the range of spatial resolution in preclinical use and when the signal to noise ratio is fixed. The result is reproducible for repeated measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6818162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Chang Gung University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68181622019-11-04 The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio Chen, Yao-Liang Lin, Yu-Jen Lin, Sung-Han Tsai, Chih-Chien Lin, Yu-Chun Cheng, Jur-Shan Wang, Jiun-Jie Biomed J Original article BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of the compartmental diffusion measurement. METHODS: Two identical whipping cream phantoms and two healthy Sprague–Dawley rats were scanned on a 7T MR scanner, each repeated for three times. Diffusion weighted images were acquired along 30 non-collinear gradient directions, each with four b-values of 750, 1500, 2250 and 3000 s/mm(2). Slice thickness and field of view were used to create different combinations of voxel sizes, varied between 1.210 and 2.366 mm(3) in phantom and 0.200–0.303 mm(3) in rat brains. Multiple averages were used to achieve a controlled signal to noise ratio. RESULTS: Diffusion imaging showed good stability throughout the range of voxel sizes acquired from either the cream phantom or the rat, when the signal to noise ratio is controlled. The reproducibility analysis showed the within-subject coefficient of variation varied between 0.88% and 6.99% for phantom and 0.69%–6.19% for rat. Diffusion imaging is stable among different voxel sizes in 3 aspects: A. from both compartments in phantom and in the rat; B. in measurement of diffusivity and kurtosis and C. along axial, radial and averaged in all directions. CONCLUSION: Diffusion imaging in a heterogeneous but isotropic phantom and in vivo is consistent within the range of spatial resolution in preclinical use and when the signal to noise ratio is fixed. The result is reproducible for repeated measurements. Chang Gung University 2019-08 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6818162/ /pubmed/31627869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.03.002 Text en © 2019 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article Chen, Yao-Liang Lin, Yu-Jen Lin, Sung-Han Tsai, Chih-Chien Lin, Yu-Chun Cheng, Jur-Shan Wang, Jiun-Jie The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio |
title | The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio |
title_full | The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio |
title_fullStr | The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio |
title_short | The effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio |
title_sort | effect of spatial resolution on the reproducibility of diffusion imaging when controlled signal to noise ratio |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31627869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.03.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyaoliang theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT linyujen theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT linsunghan theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT tsaichihchien theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT linyuchun theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT chengjurshan theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT wangjiunjie theeffectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT chenyaoliang effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT linyujen effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT linsunghan effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT tsaichihchien effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT linyuchun effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT chengjurshan effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio AT wangjiunjie effectofspatialresolutiononthereproducibilityofdiffusionimagingwhencontrolledsignaltonoiseratio |