Cargando…

Outcomes Of Chimney Technique For Aortic Arch Diseases: A Single-Center Experience With 226 Cases

PURPOSE: The goal of present study is to document our single-center experience with chimney technique for aortic arch diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 2012 to October 2017, 226 patients (mean age 54±12 years; 197 men) with aortic arch diseases underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Wenhui, Ding, Huanyu, Jiang, Minchun, Liu, Yuan, Huang, Cheng, Yang, Xinyue, Fan, Ruixin, Luo, Jianfang, Jiang, Zhisheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749612
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S222948
_version_ 1783463635876577280
author Huang, Wenhui
Ding, Huanyu
Jiang, Minchun
Liu, Yuan
Huang, Cheng
Yang, Xinyue
Fan, Ruixin
Luo, Jianfang
Jiang, Zhisheng
author_facet Huang, Wenhui
Ding, Huanyu
Jiang, Minchun
Liu, Yuan
Huang, Cheng
Yang, Xinyue
Fan, Ruixin
Luo, Jianfang
Jiang, Zhisheng
author_sort Huang, Wenhui
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of present study is to document our single-center experience with chimney technique for aortic arch diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 2012 to October 2017, 226 patients (mean age 54±12 years; 197 men) with aortic arch diseases underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with chimney stents. The aortic stent-grafts were deployed in zone 0 (n=22), zone 1 (n=13), or zone 2 (n=191). RESULTS: The technical success rate was 84% (189/226) and immediate type Ia endoleak (ELIa) happened in 37 (16%) patients. The 30-day mortality and morbidity rates were 2% (4/226) and 4% (8/226), respectively. Major adverse events include four major strokes, three spinal cord ischemia and one aortic rupture in the early-term. The clinical and imaging follow-up rates were 98% (218/222) and 78% (173/222), respectively. The average lengths of clinical and imaging follow-up were 22±16 months and 20±15 months, respectively. Chimney stent obstructions in left subclavian arteries were recorded in six (3%) patients. During follow-up, five patients died (2%) and two major strokes occurred (1%). One patient (0.5%) underwent reintervention. CONCLUSION: The current study documented that the chimney technique is effective and safe for treating aortic arch diseases in different aortic zones. Cautions are needed to assess the permanency of chimney stent and to reduce the immediate ELIa rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6818674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68186742019-11-20 Outcomes Of Chimney Technique For Aortic Arch Diseases: A Single-Center Experience With 226 Cases Huang, Wenhui Ding, Huanyu Jiang, Minchun Liu, Yuan Huang, Cheng Yang, Xinyue Fan, Ruixin Luo, Jianfang Jiang, Zhisheng Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: The goal of present study is to document our single-center experience with chimney technique for aortic arch diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 2012 to October 2017, 226 patients (mean age 54±12 years; 197 men) with aortic arch diseases underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with chimney stents. The aortic stent-grafts were deployed in zone 0 (n=22), zone 1 (n=13), or zone 2 (n=191). RESULTS: The technical success rate was 84% (189/226) and immediate type Ia endoleak (ELIa) happened in 37 (16%) patients. The 30-day mortality and morbidity rates were 2% (4/226) and 4% (8/226), respectively. Major adverse events include four major strokes, three spinal cord ischemia and one aortic rupture in the early-term. The clinical and imaging follow-up rates were 98% (218/222) and 78% (173/222), respectively. The average lengths of clinical and imaging follow-up were 22±16 months and 20±15 months, respectively. Chimney stent obstructions in left subclavian arteries were recorded in six (3%) patients. During follow-up, five patients died (2%) and two major strokes occurred (1%). One patient (0.5%) underwent reintervention. CONCLUSION: The current study documented that the chimney technique is effective and safe for treating aortic arch diseases in different aortic zones. Cautions are needed to assess the permanency of chimney stent and to reduce the immediate ELIa rate. Dove 2019-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6818674/ /pubmed/31749612 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S222948 Text en © 2019 Huang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Huang, Wenhui
Ding, Huanyu
Jiang, Minchun
Liu, Yuan
Huang, Cheng
Yang, Xinyue
Fan, Ruixin
Luo, Jianfang
Jiang, Zhisheng
Outcomes Of Chimney Technique For Aortic Arch Diseases: A Single-Center Experience With 226 Cases
title Outcomes Of Chimney Technique For Aortic Arch Diseases: A Single-Center Experience With 226 Cases
title_full Outcomes Of Chimney Technique For Aortic Arch Diseases: A Single-Center Experience With 226 Cases
title_fullStr Outcomes Of Chimney Technique For Aortic Arch Diseases: A Single-Center Experience With 226 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes Of Chimney Technique For Aortic Arch Diseases: A Single-Center Experience With 226 Cases
title_short Outcomes Of Chimney Technique For Aortic Arch Diseases: A Single-Center Experience With 226 Cases
title_sort outcomes of chimney technique for aortic arch diseases: a single-center experience with 226 cases
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749612
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S222948
work_keys_str_mv AT huangwenhui outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases
AT dinghuanyu outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases
AT jiangminchun outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases
AT liuyuan outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases
AT huangcheng outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases
AT yangxinyue outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases
AT fanruixin outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases
AT luojianfang outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases
AT jiangzhisheng outcomesofchimneytechniqueforaorticarchdiseasesasinglecenterexperiencewith226cases