Cargando…

Using family network data in child protection services

Preventing child abuse is a unifying goal. Making decisions that affect the lives of children is an unenviable task assigned to social services in countries around the world. The consequences of incorrectly labelling children as being at risk of abuse or missing signs that children are unsafe are we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Alex, McLeod, Jeanette, Hendy, Shaun, Marks, Kip, Rusu, Delia, Nik, Syen, Plank, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31661513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224554
_version_ 1783463650699247616
author James, Alex
McLeod, Jeanette
Hendy, Shaun
Marks, Kip
Rusu, Delia
Nik, Syen
Plank, Michael J.
author_facet James, Alex
McLeod, Jeanette
Hendy, Shaun
Marks, Kip
Rusu, Delia
Nik, Syen
Plank, Michael J.
author_sort James, Alex
collection PubMed
description Preventing child abuse is a unifying goal. Making decisions that affect the lives of children is an unenviable task assigned to social services in countries around the world. The consequences of incorrectly labelling children as being at risk of abuse or missing signs that children are unsafe are well-documented. Evidence-based decision-making tools are increasingly common in social services provision but few, if any, have used social network data. We analyse a child protection services dataset that includes a network of approximately 5 million social relationships collected by social workers between 1996 and 2016 in New Zealand. We test the potential of information about family networks to improve accuracy of models used to predict the risk of child maltreatment. We simulate integration of the dataset with birth records to construct more complete family network information by including information that would be available earlier if these databases were integrated. Including family network data can improve the performance of models relative to using individual demographic data alone. The best models are those that contain the integrated birth records rather than just the recorded data. Having access to this information at the time a child’s case is first notified to child protection services leads to a particularly marked improvement. Our results quantify the importance of a child’s family network and show that a better understanding of risk can be achieved by linking other commonly available datasets with child protection records to provide the most up-to-date information possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6818793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68187932019-11-01 Using family network data in child protection services James, Alex McLeod, Jeanette Hendy, Shaun Marks, Kip Rusu, Delia Nik, Syen Plank, Michael J. PLoS One Research Article Preventing child abuse is a unifying goal. Making decisions that affect the lives of children is an unenviable task assigned to social services in countries around the world. The consequences of incorrectly labelling children as being at risk of abuse or missing signs that children are unsafe are well-documented. Evidence-based decision-making tools are increasingly common in social services provision but few, if any, have used social network data. We analyse a child protection services dataset that includes a network of approximately 5 million social relationships collected by social workers between 1996 and 2016 in New Zealand. We test the potential of information about family networks to improve accuracy of models used to predict the risk of child maltreatment. We simulate integration of the dataset with birth records to construct more complete family network information by including information that would be available earlier if these databases were integrated. Including family network data can improve the performance of models relative to using individual demographic data alone. The best models are those that contain the integrated birth records rather than just the recorded data. Having access to this information at the time a child’s case is first notified to child protection services leads to a particularly marked improvement. Our results quantify the importance of a child’s family network and show that a better understanding of risk can be achieved by linking other commonly available datasets with child protection records to provide the most up-to-date information possible. Public Library of Science 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6818793/ /pubmed/31661513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224554 Text en © 2019 James et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
James, Alex
McLeod, Jeanette
Hendy, Shaun
Marks, Kip
Rusu, Delia
Nik, Syen
Plank, Michael J.
Using family network data in child protection services
title Using family network data in child protection services
title_full Using family network data in child protection services
title_fullStr Using family network data in child protection services
title_full_unstemmed Using family network data in child protection services
title_short Using family network data in child protection services
title_sort using family network data in child protection services
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31661513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224554
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesalex usingfamilynetworkdatainchildprotectionservices
AT mcleodjeanette usingfamilynetworkdatainchildprotectionservices
AT hendyshaun usingfamilynetworkdatainchildprotectionservices
AT markskip usingfamilynetworkdatainchildprotectionservices
AT rusudelia usingfamilynetworkdatainchildprotectionservices
AT niksyen usingfamilynetworkdatainchildprotectionservices
AT plankmichaelj usingfamilynetworkdatainchildprotectionservices