Cargando…

Risk Factors for Persistent Shoulder Pain After Cervical Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE: To define risk factors of having persistent shoulder pain following cervical spine surgery. METHODS: From April 1995 to May 2012, 862 patients underwent cervical spine surgery in a tertiary referral university hospital. Ninety‐six patients were referred to a shoulder surgeon for persisten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kholinne, Erica, Kwak, Jae‐Man, Sun, Yucheng, Lee, Hyun‐Joo, Koh, Kyoung Hwan, Jeon, In‐Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31663284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12531
_version_ 1783463684847173632
author Kholinne, Erica
Kwak, Jae‐Man
Sun, Yucheng
Lee, Hyun‐Joo
Koh, Kyoung Hwan
Jeon, In‐Ho
author_facet Kholinne, Erica
Kwak, Jae‐Man
Sun, Yucheng
Lee, Hyun‐Joo
Koh, Kyoung Hwan
Jeon, In‐Ho
author_sort Kholinne, Erica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To define risk factors of having persistent shoulder pain following cervical spine surgery. METHODS: From April 1995 to May 2012, 862 patients underwent cervical spine surgery in a tertiary referral university hospital. Ninety‐six patients were referred to a shoulder surgeon for persistent shoulder pain over 3 months after cervical spine surgery. Thirty‐five were excluded from the study due to failure to follow‐up or lack of radiographic data. We analyzed a total of 61 patients as patient group (PG) compared to age, sex, and surgeon matched control group (CG) with no shoulder pain after surgery. Medical records were reviewed for age, sex, level of cervical surgery, approach of cervical surgery, underlying medical problems, final diagnosis of the shoulder pathology, and shoulder visual analog scale (VAS) score. The pre‐ and post‐operative variables for level of cervical surgery, approach of cervical surgery, underlying medical history, and shoulder VAS were compared and analyzed in this study. RESULTS: The number of patients with lower cervical level surgery was significantly higher (91 patients, 74.6%) compared to upper cervical level surgery (31 patients, 25.4%) (P = 0.005). Anterior approach was more frequently used (70 patients, 57.3%) compared to posterior approach (52 patients, 42.7%) (P < 0.001). The final diagnosis of shoulder pathology in PG were rotator cuff disease in 31 patients, adhesive capsulitis in 18 patients, and calcific tendinitis in 10 patients respectively. No significant difference for preoperative shoulder VAS score was found in both groups. A lower level of cervical spine pathology in patients (C(4)‐T(1) level) and posterior approach surgery were factors that significantly presented with more shoulder pain. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistical difference for level of cervical surgery and approach of cervical surgery among groups with different shoulder pathology. CONCLUSIONS: The current study includes patients with persistent shoulder pain following cervical surgery without having evidence of concurrent preexisting shoulder pathology documented previously. We suggest that posterior approach and lower level of cervical surgery patients could be clinically relevant risk factors for persistent shoulder pain following cervical spine surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6819176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68191762019-11-04 Risk Factors for Persistent Shoulder Pain After Cervical Spine Surgery Kholinne, Erica Kwak, Jae‐Man Sun, Yucheng Lee, Hyun‐Joo Koh, Kyoung Hwan Jeon, In‐Ho Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To define risk factors of having persistent shoulder pain following cervical spine surgery. METHODS: From April 1995 to May 2012, 862 patients underwent cervical spine surgery in a tertiary referral university hospital. Ninety‐six patients were referred to a shoulder surgeon for persistent shoulder pain over 3 months after cervical spine surgery. Thirty‐five were excluded from the study due to failure to follow‐up or lack of radiographic data. We analyzed a total of 61 patients as patient group (PG) compared to age, sex, and surgeon matched control group (CG) with no shoulder pain after surgery. Medical records were reviewed for age, sex, level of cervical surgery, approach of cervical surgery, underlying medical problems, final diagnosis of the shoulder pathology, and shoulder visual analog scale (VAS) score. The pre‐ and post‐operative variables for level of cervical surgery, approach of cervical surgery, underlying medical history, and shoulder VAS were compared and analyzed in this study. RESULTS: The number of patients with lower cervical level surgery was significantly higher (91 patients, 74.6%) compared to upper cervical level surgery (31 patients, 25.4%) (P = 0.005). Anterior approach was more frequently used (70 patients, 57.3%) compared to posterior approach (52 patients, 42.7%) (P < 0.001). The final diagnosis of shoulder pathology in PG were rotator cuff disease in 31 patients, adhesive capsulitis in 18 patients, and calcific tendinitis in 10 patients respectively. No significant difference for preoperative shoulder VAS score was found in both groups. A lower level of cervical spine pathology in patients (C(4)‐T(1) level) and posterior approach surgery were factors that significantly presented with more shoulder pain. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistical difference for level of cervical surgery and approach of cervical surgery among groups with different shoulder pathology. CONCLUSIONS: The current study includes patients with persistent shoulder pain following cervical surgery without having evidence of concurrent preexisting shoulder pathology documented previously. We suggest that posterior approach and lower level of cervical surgery patients could be clinically relevant risk factors for persistent shoulder pain following cervical spine surgery. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6819176/ /pubmed/31663284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12531 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Kholinne, Erica
Kwak, Jae‐Man
Sun, Yucheng
Lee, Hyun‐Joo
Koh, Kyoung Hwan
Jeon, In‐Ho
Risk Factors for Persistent Shoulder Pain After Cervical Spine Surgery
title Risk Factors for Persistent Shoulder Pain After Cervical Spine Surgery
title_full Risk Factors for Persistent Shoulder Pain After Cervical Spine Surgery
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Persistent Shoulder Pain After Cervical Spine Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Persistent Shoulder Pain After Cervical Spine Surgery
title_short Risk Factors for Persistent Shoulder Pain After Cervical Spine Surgery
title_sort risk factors for persistent shoulder pain after cervical spine surgery
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31663284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12531
work_keys_str_mv AT kholinneerica riskfactorsforpersistentshoulderpainaftercervicalspinesurgery
AT kwakjaeman riskfactorsforpersistentshoulderpainaftercervicalspinesurgery
AT sunyucheng riskfactorsforpersistentshoulderpainaftercervicalspinesurgery
AT leehyunjoo riskfactorsforpersistentshoulderpainaftercervicalspinesurgery
AT kohkyounghwan riskfactorsforpersistentshoulderpainaftercervicalspinesurgery
AT jeoninho riskfactorsforpersistentshoulderpainaftercervicalspinesurgery