Cargando…

Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This study aims to optimize the therapeutic regimen for refractory obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (o-MGD) patients by combining intraductal meibomian gland probing (MGP) and intense pulsed light (IPL) to enhance their positive effects and reduce their limitations. METHODS: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xiaodan, Qin, Qiyu, Wang, Linping, Zheng, Jiao, Lin, Lin, Jin, Xiuming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1219-6
_version_ 1783463703086104576
author Huang, Xiaodan
Qin, Qiyu
Wang, Linping
Zheng, Jiao
Lin, Lin
Jin, Xiuming
author_facet Huang, Xiaodan
Qin, Qiyu
Wang, Linping
Zheng, Jiao
Lin, Lin
Jin, Xiuming
author_sort Huang, Xiaodan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to optimize the therapeutic regimen for refractory obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (o-MGD) patients by combining intraductal meibomian gland probing (MGP) and intense pulsed light (IPL) to enhance their positive effects and reduce their limitations. METHODS: This randomized, assessor blind study includes 45 patients (90 eyes) with refractory o-MGD who were divided into 3 groups via allocation concealment: IPL (group I, received an IPL treatment course: 3 times at 3-week intervals), MGP (group II, received MGP one time), and combined MGP-IPL (group III, MGP first followed by an IPL treatment course). Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness score (SPEED), tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), meibum grade, and lid margin finding results were assessed at baseline, 3 weeks after final treatment for groups I and III, 3 and 12 weeks after MGP for group II. Six months after final treatment, the SPEED and willingness to receive any treatment again were also collected for all groups. Paired Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: For all 3 groups, all previously mentioned indexes improved significantly following treatment (P<0.01). MGP-IPL was better than IPL and MGP in terms of post-treatment SPEED, TBUT, meibum grade, and lid telangiectasia (P<0.05/3). Furthermore, the MGP-IPL was better than IPL in terms of lid tenderness and better than MGP in terms of orifice abnormality (P< 0.05/3). Six months later, the SPEED for the MGP-IPL was also significantly lower than other groups (P<0.05/3). Moreover, no patients in the MGP-IPL group expressed the need to be treated again compared to 35.7% or 20% of patients in the IPL or MGP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IPL or MGP alone, the combination MGP-IPL produced best results in relieving all signs and symptoms and helping patients attain long-lasting symptom relief. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov, ChiCTR1900021273 (retrospectively registered February 9, 2019).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6819328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68193282019-10-31 Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial Huang, Xiaodan Qin, Qiyu Wang, Linping Zheng, Jiao Lin, Lin Jin, Xiuming BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aims to optimize the therapeutic regimen for refractory obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (o-MGD) patients by combining intraductal meibomian gland probing (MGP) and intense pulsed light (IPL) to enhance their positive effects and reduce their limitations. METHODS: This randomized, assessor blind study includes 45 patients (90 eyes) with refractory o-MGD who were divided into 3 groups via allocation concealment: IPL (group I, received an IPL treatment course: 3 times at 3-week intervals), MGP (group II, received MGP one time), and combined MGP-IPL (group III, MGP first followed by an IPL treatment course). Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness score (SPEED), tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), meibum grade, and lid margin finding results were assessed at baseline, 3 weeks after final treatment for groups I and III, 3 and 12 weeks after MGP for group II. Six months after final treatment, the SPEED and willingness to receive any treatment again were also collected for all groups. Paired Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U with Bonferroni correction, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: For all 3 groups, all previously mentioned indexes improved significantly following treatment (P<0.01). MGP-IPL was better than IPL and MGP in terms of post-treatment SPEED, TBUT, meibum grade, and lid telangiectasia (P<0.05/3). Furthermore, the MGP-IPL was better than IPL in terms of lid tenderness and better than MGP in terms of orifice abnormality (P< 0.05/3). Six months later, the SPEED for the MGP-IPL was also significantly lower than other groups (P<0.05/3). Moreover, no patients in the MGP-IPL group expressed the need to be treated again compared to 35.7% or 20% of patients in the IPL or MGP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IPL or MGP alone, the combination MGP-IPL produced best results in relieving all signs and symptoms and helping patients attain long-lasting symptom relief. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov, ChiCTR1900021273 (retrospectively registered February 9, 2019). BioMed Central 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6819328/ /pubmed/31660904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1219-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Xiaodan
Qin, Qiyu
Wang, Linping
Zheng, Jiao
Lin, Lin
Jin, Xiuming
Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial
title Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Clinical results of Intraductal Meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive Meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort clinical results of intraductal meibomian gland probing combined with intense pulsed light in treating patients with refractory obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1219-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxiaodan clinicalresultsofintraductalmeibomianglandprobingcombinedwithintensepulsedlightintreatingpatientswithrefractoryobstructivemeibomianglanddysfunctionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qinqiyu clinicalresultsofintraductalmeibomianglandprobingcombinedwithintensepulsedlightintreatingpatientswithrefractoryobstructivemeibomianglanddysfunctionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wanglinping clinicalresultsofintraductalmeibomianglandprobingcombinedwithintensepulsedlightintreatingpatientswithrefractoryobstructivemeibomianglanddysfunctionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhengjiao clinicalresultsofintraductalmeibomianglandprobingcombinedwithintensepulsedlightintreatingpatientswithrefractoryobstructivemeibomianglanddysfunctionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linlin clinicalresultsofintraductalmeibomianglandprobingcombinedwithintensepulsedlightintreatingpatientswithrefractoryobstructivemeibomianglanddysfunctionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jinxiuming clinicalresultsofintraductalmeibomianglandprobingcombinedwithintensepulsedlightintreatingpatientswithrefractoryobstructivemeibomianglanddysfunctionarandomizedcontrolledtrial