Cargando…

Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Genomics-based noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) allow screening for chromosomal anomalies such as Down syndrome (trisomy 21). The technique uses cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) that circulates in the maternal blood and is detectable from 5 weeks of gestation onwards. Parents who choose to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labonté, Valérie, Alsaid, Dima, Lang, Britta, Meerpohl, Joerg J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2518-x
_version_ 1783463733255733248
author Labonté, Valérie
Alsaid, Dima
Lang, Britta
Meerpohl, Joerg J.
author_facet Labonté, Valérie
Alsaid, Dima
Lang, Britta
Meerpohl, Joerg J.
author_sort Labonté, Valérie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomics-based noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) allow screening for chromosomal anomalies such as Down syndrome (trisomy 21). The technique uses cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) that circulates in the maternal blood and is detectable from 5 weeks of gestation onwards. Parents who choose to undergo this relatively new test (introduced in 2011) might be aware of its positive features (i.e. clinical safety and ease of use); however, they might be less aware of the required decisions and accompanying internal conflicts following a potential positive test result. To show the evidence on psychological and social consequences of the use of NIPT, we conducted a scoping review. METHODS: We systematically searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EBSCO) and PsychINFO (EBSCO)) for studies that investigated the psychological or social consequences of the use of NIPT by pregnant women or expecting parents. The search was limited to studies published between 2011 and August 8, 2018. We identified 2488 studies and, after removal of duplicates, screened 2007 titles and abstracts, and then assessed 99 articles in full text (both screenings were done independently in duplicate). We included 7 studies in our analysis. RESULTS: Five studies assessed anxiety, psychological distress and/or decisional regret among women with validated psychological tests like the Spielberger State Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised (PRAQ-R), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) or the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS). Two studies assessed women’s experiences with and feelings after NIPT in interviews or focus groups. The included studies were heterogeneous in location, study setting, inclusion criteria, outcome assessment, and other characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Only few studies on psychological consequences of NIPT have been identified. The studies assessed only short-term psychological consequences of NIPT at baseline and/or after receiving the results or after giving birth. Studies show that short term anxiety decreased when women received negative NIPT results and that decisional regret was generally low. We could not identify studies on long term consequences of NIPT, as well as studies on women’s partners’ short and long term outcomes, nor on social consequences of NIPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6819451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68194512019-10-31 Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review Labonté, Valérie Alsaid, Dima Lang, Britta Meerpohl, Joerg J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomics-based noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) allow screening for chromosomal anomalies such as Down syndrome (trisomy 21). The technique uses cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) that circulates in the maternal blood and is detectable from 5 weeks of gestation onwards. Parents who choose to undergo this relatively new test (introduced in 2011) might be aware of its positive features (i.e. clinical safety and ease of use); however, they might be less aware of the required decisions and accompanying internal conflicts following a potential positive test result. To show the evidence on psychological and social consequences of the use of NIPT, we conducted a scoping review. METHODS: We systematically searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EBSCO) and PsychINFO (EBSCO)) for studies that investigated the psychological or social consequences of the use of NIPT by pregnant women or expecting parents. The search was limited to studies published between 2011 and August 8, 2018. We identified 2488 studies and, after removal of duplicates, screened 2007 titles and abstracts, and then assessed 99 articles in full text (both screenings were done independently in duplicate). We included 7 studies in our analysis. RESULTS: Five studies assessed anxiety, psychological distress and/or decisional regret among women with validated psychological tests like the Spielberger State Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised (PRAQ-R), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) or the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS). Two studies assessed women’s experiences with and feelings after NIPT in interviews or focus groups. The included studies were heterogeneous in location, study setting, inclusion criteria, outcome assessment, and other characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Only few studies on psychological consequences of NIPT have been identified. The studies assessed only short-term psychological consequences of NIPT at baseline and/or after receiving the results or after giving birth. Studies show that short term anxiety decreased when women received negative NIPT results and that decisional regret was generally low. We could not identify studies on long term consequences of NIPT, as well as studies on women’s partners’ short and long term outcomes, nor on social consequences of NIPT. BioMed Central 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6819451/ /pubmed/31660889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2518-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Labonté, Valérie
Alsaid, Dima
Lang, Britta
Meerpohl, Joerg J.
Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
title Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
title_full Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
title_fullStr Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
title_short Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review
title_sort psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (nipt): a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2518-x
work_keys_str_mv AT labontevalerie psychologicalandsocialconsequencesofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptascopingreview
AT alsaiddima psychologicalandsocialconsequencesofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptascopingreview
AT langbritta psychologicalandsocialconsequencesofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptascopingreview
AT meerpohljoergj psychologicalandsocialconsequencesofnoninvasiveprenataltestingniptascopingreview