Cargando…

Staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND: Male genital skin loss is a common disease in urology. However, male genital skin loss accompanying a penile urethra defect is rarely reported. Herein, we describe a novel surgical technique using a composite local flap and oral mucosal graft to reconstruct the penis, which may provide a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Da-chao, Xie, Min-kai, Fu, Shi-bo, Guo, Jian-hua, Li, Wen-ji, Yao, Hai-jun, Wang, Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0537-6
_version_ 1783463765438627840
author Zheng, Da-chao
Xie, Min-kai
Fu, Shi-bo
Guo, Jian-hua
Li, Wen-ji
Yao, Hai-jun
Wang, Zhong
author_facet Zheng, Da-chao
Xie, Min-kai
Fu, Shi-bo
Guo, Jian-hua
Li, Wen-ji
Yao, Hai-jun
Wang, Zhong
author_sort Zheng, Da-chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Male genital skin loss is a common disease in urology. However, male genital skin loss accompanying a penile urethra defect is rarely reported. Herein, we describe a novel surgical technique using a composite local flap and oral mucosal graft to reconstruct the penis, which may provide a new solution for patients with similar conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old male with a penile urethra defect and a large area of genital skin loss required urethral reconstruction. The meatus had descended to the penoscrotal junction. This procedure was divided into three stages. The first stage of the surgery involved burying the nude penile shaft beneath the skin of the left anteromedial thigh for coverage of the skin defect. The second stage consisted of releasing the penis and expanding the size of the urethral plate for further urethroplasty. The third stage consisted of reconstruction of the anterior urethra 6 months later. Postoperatively, the patient reported satisfactory voiding. The maximal flow rate (MFR) was 22.2 ml/s with no postvoiding residual urine at the 24-month follow-up visit. No edema, infection, hemorrhage, or cicatricial retraction were observed. The patient’s erectile function was satisfactory, and his international index of erectile function-5 score (IIEF-5 score) was 23 at the 24-month follow-up visit. Additionally, the presence of nocturnal penile tumescence demonstrated that he had normal erectile function. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure is an effective surgical option for men with complete foreskin and penile urethra defects. It could also be extended as a treatment strategy when composite local or pedicle transposition flaps and free grafts are needed for specific patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6819581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68195812019-10-31 Staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review Zheng, Da-chao Xie, Min-kai Fu, Shi-bo Guo, Jian-hua Li, Wen-ji Yao, Hai-jun Wang, Zhong BMC Urol Case Report BACKGROUND: Male genital skin loss is a common disease in urology. However, male genital skin loss accompanying a penile urethra defect is rarely reported. Herein, we describe a novel surgical technique using a composite local flap and oral mucosal graft to reconstruct the penis, which may provide a new solution for patients with similar conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old male with a penile urethra defect and a large area of genital skin loss required urethral reconstruction. The meatus had descended to the penoscrotal junction. This procedure was divided into three stages. The first stage of the surgery involved burying the nude penile shaft beneath the skin of the left anteromedial thigh for coverage of the skin defect. The second stage consisted of releasing the penis and expanding the size of the urethral plate for further urethroplasty. The third stage consisted of reconstruction of the anterior urethra 6 months later. Postoperatively, the patient reported satisfactory voiding. The maximal flow rate (MFR) was 22.2 ml/s with no postvoiding residual urine at the 24-month follow-up visit. No edema, infection, hemorrhage, or cicatricial retraction were observed. The patient’s erectile function was satisfactory, and his international index of erectile function-5 score (IIEF-5 score) was 23 at the 24-month follow-up visit. Additionally, the presence of nocturnal penile tumescence demonstrated that he had normal erectile function. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure is an effective surgical option for men with complete foreskin and penile urethra defects. It could also be extended as a treatment strategy when composite local or pedicle transposition flaps and free grafts are needed for specific patients. BioMed Central 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6819581/ /pubmed/31664996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0537-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Zheng, Da-chao
Xie, Min-kai
Fu, Shi-bo
Guo, Jian-hua
Li, Wen-ji
Yao, Hai-jun
Wang, Zhong
Staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review
title Staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review
title_full Staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review
title_fullStr Staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review
title_short Staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review
title_sort staged male genital reconstruction with a local flap and free oral graft: a case report and literature review
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0537-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengdachao stagedmalegenitalreconstructionwithalocalflapandfreeoralgraftacasereportandliteraturereview
AT xieminkai stagedmalegenitalreconstructionwithalocalflapandfreeoralgraftacasereportandliteraturereview
AT fushibo stagedmalegenitalreconstructionwithalocalflapandfreeoralgraftacasereportandliteraturereview
AT guojianhua stagedmalegenitalreconstructionwithalocalflapandfreeoralgraftacasereportandliteraturereview
AT liwenji stagedmalegenitalreconstructionwithalocalflapandfreeoralgraftacasereportandliteraturereview
AT yaohaijun stagedmalegenitalreconstructionwithalocalflapandfreeoralgraftacasereportandliteraturereview
AT wangzhong stagedmalegenitalreconstructionwithalocalflapandfreeoralgraftacasereportandliteraturereview