Cargando…

‘Weighty issues’ in GP-led antenatal care: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of women gain weight in excess of gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations during pregnancy leading to adverse maternal and foetal outcomes and the perpetuation of the cycle of obesity. Antenatal care provided by a general practitioner (GP) in the primary care sett...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Ruth, Choi, Tammie S. T., Alexander, Karyn, Mazza, Danielle, Truby, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1026-4
_version_ 1783463770148831232
author Walker, Ruth
Choi, Tammie S. T.
Alexander, Karyn
Mazza, Danielle
Truby, Helen
author_facet Walker, Ruth
Choi, Tammie S. T.
Alexander, Karyn
Mazza, Danielle
Truby, Helen
author_sort Walker, Ruth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of women gain weight in excess of gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations during pregnancy leading to adverse maternal and foetal outcomes and the perpetuation of the cycle of obesity. Antenatal care provided by a general practitioner (GP) in the primary care setting is an important model of care, particularly for women in regional areas where rates of overweight and obesity are highest. The aim of this study is to explore GPs’ perceptions and experiences of implementing GWG recommendations in GP-led antenatal care. METHODS: A qualitative exploratory approach recorded GPs’ experiences and insights regarding the application of GWG recommendations in practice. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews informed by the revised Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Deductive thematic analysis grouped coded text into TDF domains from which main themes were generated. RESULTS: Twenty GPs (13 female, 7 male) from metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia participated. Codes related to at least one of 11 TDF domains. Five main themes were apparent: 1) Despite low awareness of guidelines, GWG advice is provided; 2) ‘I should do this more’; 3) Lack of everyday resources; 4) Working ‘against the odds’ at times; and 5) Optimism and reality. GPs were aware of the importance of optimal GWG however, other pregnancy-related issues are given precedence during consultations. Enablers for the implementation of GWG guidelines were practitioner-based and included GPs’ strong sense of their professional role to provide advice, and ongoing and trusting relationships with women throughout pregnancy. Barriers were mostly health system-based with limited time, remuneration, and restrictive referral pathways being limiting factors. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to support GPs to provide GWG advice in accordance with current national guidelines. Solutions potentially lie in strategies that promote the effective dissemination and uptake of guidelines, and changes to policy and funding within the health-system so that longer GP-led antenatal care consultations are remunerated and referrals to allied health are accessible to women who require additional support to optimise GWG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6819596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68195962019-10-31 ‘Weighty issues’ in GP-led antenatal care: a qualitative study Walker, Ruth Choi, Tammie S. T. Alexander, Karyn Mazza, Danielle Truby, Helen BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of women gain weight in excess of gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations during pregnancy leading to adverse maternal and foetal outcomes and the perpetuation of the cycle of obesity. Antenatal care provided by a general practitioner (GP) in the primary care setting is an important model of care, particularly for women in regional areas where rates of overweight and obesity are highest. The aim of this study is to explore GPs’ perceptions and experiences of implementing GWG recommendations in GP-led antenatal care. METHODS: A qualitative exploratory approach recorded GPs’ experiences and insights regarding the application of GWG recommendations in practice. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews informed by the revised Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Deductive thematic analysis grouped coded text into TDF domains from which main themes were generated. RESULTS: Twenty GPs (13 female, 7 male) from metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia participated. Codes related to at least one of 11 TDF domains. Five main themes were apparent: 1) Despite low awareness of guidelines, GWG advice is provided; 2) ‘I should do this more’; 3) Lack of everyday resources; 4) Working ‘against the odds’ at times; and 5) Optimism and reality. GPs were aware of the importance of optimal GWG however, other pregnancy-related issues are given precedence during consultations. Enablers for the implementation of GWG guidelines were practitioner-based and included GPs’ strong sense of their professional role to provide advice, and ongoing and trusting relationships with women throughout pregnancy. Barriers were mostly health system-based with limited time, remuneration, and restrictive referral pathways being limiting factors. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to support GPs to provide GWG advice in accordance with current national guidelines. Solutions potentially lie in strategies that promote the effective dissemination and uptake of guidelines, and changes to policy and funding within the health-system so that longer GP-led antenatal care consultations are remunerated and referrals to allied health are accessible to women who require additional support to optimise GWG. BioMed Central 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6819596/ /pubmed/31664915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1026-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Walker, Ruth
Choi, Tammie S. T.
Alexander, Karyn
Mazza, Danielle
Truby, Helen
‘Weighty issues’ in GP-led antenatal care: a qualitative study
title ‘Weighty issues’ in GP-led antenatal care: a qualitative study
title_full ‘Weighty issues’ in GP-led antenatal care: a qualitative study
title_fullStr ‘Weighty issues’ in GP-led antenatal care: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed ‘Weighty issues’ in GP-led antenatal care: a qualitative study
title_short ‘Weighty issues’ in GP-led antenatal care: a qualitative study
title_sort ‘weighty issues’ in gp-led antenatal care: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1026-4
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerruth weightyissuesingpledantenatalcareaqualitativestudy
AT choitammiest weightyissuesingpledantenatalcareaqualitativestudy
AT alexanderkaryn weightyissuesingpledantenatalcareaqualitativestudy
AT mazzadanielle weightyissuesingpledantenatalcareaqualitativestudy
AT trubyhelen weightyissuesingpledantenatalcareaqualitativestudy