Cargando…

Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable?

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarinoma (ICC) has a rising incidence in western countries. Often major or extended resections are necessary for complete tumor removal. Due to demographical trends the number of elderly patients diagnosed with ICC is rising accordingly. Aim of this study is to show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartsch, Fabian, Baumgart, Janine, Tripke, Verena, Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria, Heinrich, Stefan, Lang, Hauke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0620-7
_version_ 1783463772545875968
author Bartsch, Fabian
Baumgart, Janine
Tripke, Verena
Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria
Heinrich, Stefan
Lang, Hauke
author_facet Bartsch, Fabian
Baumgart, Janine
Tripke, Verena
Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria
Heinrich, Stefan
Lang, Hauke
author_sort Bartsch, Fabian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarinoma (ICC) has a rising incidence in western countries. Often major or extended resections are necessary for complete tumor removal. Due to demographical trends the number of elderly patients diagnosed with ICC is rising accordingly. Aim of this study is to show whether resection of ICC in elderly patients is reasonable or not. METHODS: Between January 2008 and June 2018 all consecutive patients with ICC were collected. Analyses were focussed on the performed resection, its extent, postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as survival. Statistics were performed with Chi(2) test for categorical data and for survival analyses the Kaplan Meier model with log rank test was used. RESULTS: In total 210 patients underwent surgical exploration with 150 resections (71.4%). Patients were divided in 70-years cut-off groups (> 70 vs < 70 years of age) as well as a young (age 30–50, n = 23), middle-age (50–70, n = 76) and old (> 70, n = 51) group, whose results are presented here. Resectability (p = 0.709), extent of surgery (p = 0.765), morbidity (p = 0.420) and mortality (p = 0.965) was comparable between the different age groups. Neither visceral (p = 0.991) nor vascular (p = 0.614) extension differed significantly, likewise tumor recurrence (p = 0.300) or the localisation of recurrence (p = 0.722). In comparison of patients > or < 70 years of age, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly better for the younger group (p = 0.047). For overall survival (OS) a benefit could be shown, but without reaching significance (p = 0.072). In subgroup analysis the middle-age group had significant better OS (p = 0.020) and RFS (p = 0.038) compared to the old group. Additionally, a better OS (p = 0.076) and RFS (p = 0.179) was shown in comparison with the young group as well, but without reaching significance. The young compared to the old group had analogous OS (p = 0.931) and RFS (p = 0.845). CONCLUSION: Resection of ICC in elderly patients is not associated with an increased perioperative risk. Even extended resections can be performed in elderly patients without obvious disadvantages. Middle-age patients have a clear benefit for OS and RFS, while young and old patients have a comparable and worse long-term outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6819605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68196052019-10-31 Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable? Bartsch, Fabian Baumgart, Janine Tripke, Verena Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria Heinrich, Stefan Lang, Hauke BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarinoma (ICC) has a rising incidence in western countries. Often major or extended resections are necessary for complete tumor removal. Due to demographical trends the number of elderly patients diagnosed with ICC is rising accordingly. Aim of this study is to show whether resection of ICC in elderly patients is reasonable or not. METHODS: Between January 2008 and June 2018 all consecutive patients with ICC were collected. Analyses were focussed on the performed resection, its extent, postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as survival. Statistics were performed with Chi(2) test for categorical data and for survival analyses the Kaplan Meier model with log rank test was used. RESULTS: In total 210 patients underwent surgical exploration with 150 resections (71.4%). Patients were divided in 70-years cut-off groups (> 70 vs < 70 years of age) as well as a young (age 30–50, n = 23), middle-age (50–70, n = 76) and old (> 70, n = 51) group, whose results are presented here. Resectability (p = 0.709), extent of surgery (p = 0.765), morbidity (p = 0.420) and mortality (p = 0.965) was comparable between the different age groups. Neither visceral (p = 0.991) nor vascular (p = 0.614) extension differed significantly, likewise tumor recurrence (p = 0.300) or the localisation of recurrence (p = 0.722). In comparison of patients > or < 70 years of age, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly better for the younger group (p = 0.047). For overall survival (OS) a benefit could be shown, but without reaching significance (p = 0.072). In subgroup analysis the middle-age group had significant better OS (p = 0.020) and RFS (p = 0.038) compared to the old group. Additionally, a better OS (p = 0.076) and RFS (p = 0.179) was shown in comparison with the young group as well, but without reaching significance. The young compared to the old group had analogous OS (p = 0.931) and RFS (p = 0.845). CONCLUSION: Resection of ICC in elderly patients is not associated with an increased perioperative risk. Even extended resections can be performed in elderly patients without obvious disadvantages. Middle-age patients have a clear benefit for OS and RFS, while young and old patients have a comparable and worse long-term outcome. BioMed Central 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6819605/ /pubmed/31664988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0620-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bartsch, Fabian
Baumgart, Janine
Tripke, Verena
Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria
Heinrich, Stefan
Lang, Hauke
Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable?
title Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable?
title_full Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable?
title_fullStr Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable?
title_full_unstemmed Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable?
title_short Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable?
title_sort resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0620-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bartschfabian resectionofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT baumgartjanine resectionofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT tripkeverena resectionofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT hoppelotichiusmaria resectionofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT heinrichstefan resectionofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable
AT langhauke resectionofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainelderlypatientsisitreasonable