Cargando…

Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)

BACKGROUND: We examined 15 years of key performance indicators (KPIs) of the population-based mammography screening programme (PMSP) in Flanders, Belgium. METHODS: Individual screening data were linked to the national cancer registry to obtain oncological follow-up. We benchmarked crude KPI results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goossens, M., De Brabander, I., De Grève, J., Van Ongeval, C., Martens, P., Van Limbergen, E., Kellen, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6230-z
_version_ 1783463782142443520
author Goossens, M.
De Brabander, I.
De Grève, J.
Van Ongeval, C.
Martens, P.
Van Limbergen, E.
Kellen, E.
author_facet Goossens, M.
De Brabander, I.
De Grève, J.
Van Ongeval, C.
Martens, P.
Van Limbergen, E.
Kellen, E.
author_sort Goossens, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We examined 15 years of key performance indicators (KPIs) of the population-based mammography screening programme (PMSP) in Flanders, Belgium. METHODS: Individual screening data were linked to the national cancer registry to obtain oncological follow-up. We benchmarked crude KPI results against KPI-targets set by the European guidelines and KPI results of other national screening programmes. Temporal trends were examined by plotting age-standardised KPIs against the year of screening and estimating the Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC). RESULTS: PMSP coverage increased significantly over the period of 15 years (+ 7.5% AAPC), but the increase fell to + 1.6% after invitation coverage was maximised. In 2016, PMSP coverage was at 50.0% and opportunistic coverage was at 14.1%, resulting in a total coverage by screening of 64.2%. The response to the invitations was 49.8% in 2016, without a trend. Recall rate decreased significantly (AAPC -1.5% & -5.0% in initial and subsequent regular screenings respectively) while cancer detection remained stable (AAPC 0.0%). The result was an increased positive predictive value (AAPC + 3.8%). Overall programme sensitivity was stable and was at 65.1% in 2014. In initial screens of 2015, the proportion of DCIS, tumours stage II+, and node negative invasive cancers was 18.2, 31.2, and 61.6% respectively. In subsequent regular screens of 2015, those proportions were 14.0, 24.8, and 65.4% respectively. Trends were not significant. CONCLUSION: Besides a suboptimal attendance rate, most KPIs in the Flemish PMSP meet EU benchmark targets. Nonetheless, there are several priorities for further investigation such as a critical evaluation of strategies to increase screening participation, organising a biennial radiological review of interval cancers, analysing the effect that preceding opportunistic screening has on the KPI for initial screenings, and efforts to estimate the impact on breast cancer mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6819643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68196432019-10-31 Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016) Goossens, M. De Brabander, I. De Grève, J. Van Ongeval, C. Martens, P. Van Limbergen, E. Kellen, E. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: We examined 15 years of key performance indicators (KPIs) of the population-based mammography screening programme (PMSP) in Flanders, Belgium. METHODS: Individual screening data were linked to the national cancer registry to obtain oncological follow-up. We benchmarked crude KPI results against KPI-targets set by the European guidelines and KPI results of other national screening programmes. Temporal trends were examined by plotting age-standardised KPIs against the year of screening and estimating the Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC). RESULTS: PMSP coverage increased significantly over the period of 15 years (+ 7.5% AAPC), but the increase fell to + 1.6% after invitation coverage was maximised. In 2016, PMSP coverage was at 50.0% and opportunistic coverage was at 14.1%, resulting in a total coverage by screening of 64.2%. The response to the invitations was 49.8% in 2016, without a trend. Recall rate decreased significantly (AAPC -1.5% & -5.0% in initial and subsequent regular screenings respectively) while cancer detection remained stable (AAPC 0.0%). The result was an increased positive predictive value (AAPC + 3.8%). Overall programme sensitivity was stable and was at 65.1% in 2014. In initial screens of 2015, the proportion of DCIS, tumours stage II+, and node negative invasive cancers was 18.2, 31.2, and 61.6% respectively. In subsequent regular screens of 2015, those proportions were 14.0, 24.8, and 65.4% respectively. Trends were not significant. CONCLUSION: Besides a suboptimal attendance rate, most KPIs in the Flemish PMSP meet EU benchmark targets. Nonetheless, there are several priorities for further investigation such as a critical evaluation of strategies to increase screening participation, organising a biennial radiological review of interval cancers, analysing the effect that preceding opportunistic screening has on the KPI for initial screenings, and efforts to estimate the impact on breast cancer mortality. BioMed Central 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6819643/ /pubmed/31660890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6230-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goossens, M.
De Brabander, I.
De Grève, J.
Van Ongeval, C.
Martens, P.
Van Limbergen, E.
Kellen, E.
Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)
title Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)
title_full Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)
title_fullStr Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)
title_full_unstemmed Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)
title_short Flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)
title_sort flemish breast cancer screening programme: 15 years of key performance indicators (2002–2016)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31660890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6230-z
work_keys_str_mv AT goossensm flemishbreastcancerscreeningprogramme15yearsofkeyperformanceindicators20022016
AT debrabanderi flemishbreastcancerscreeningprogramme15yearsofkeyperformanceindicators20022016
AT degrevej flemishbreastcancerscreeningprogramme15yearsofkeyperformanceindicators20022016
AT vanongevalc flemishbreastcancerscreeningprogramme15yearsofkeyperformanceindicators20022016
AT martensp flemishbreastcancerscreeningprogramme15yearsofkeyperformanceindicators20022016
AT vanlimbergene flemishbreastcancerscreeningprogramme15yearsofkeyperformanceindicators20022016
AT kellene flemishbreastcancerscreeningprogramme15yearsofkeyperformanceindicators20022016