Cargando…

Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms

PURPOSE: Ruptured blood blisters (BBA) and very small, wide necked aneurysms (VSA) remain challenging lesions to treat due to their small size, wide necks, and thin, fragile walls. In the present study, we reviewed our experience with these aneurysms treated by flow diversion. METHODS: A total of 18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghorbani, Mohammad, Griessenauer, Christoph J., Wipplinger, Christoph, Azar, Maziar, Shojaei, Hamidreza, Bavand, Karan, Khosravi, Darya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02241
_version_ 1783463831397203968
author Ghorbani, Mohammad
Griessenauer, Christoph J.
Wipplinger, Christoph
Azar, Maziar
Shojaei, Hamidreza
Bavand, Karan
Khosravi, Darya
author_facet Ghorbani, Mohammad
Griessenauer, Christoph J.
Wipplinger, Christoph
Azar, Maziar
Shojaei, Hamidreza
Bavand, Karan
Khosravi, Darya
author_sort Ghorbani, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ruptured blood blisters (BBA) and very small, wide necked aneurysms (VSA) remain challenging lesions to treat due to their small size, wide necks, and thin, fragile walls. In the present study, we reviewed our experience with these aneurysms treated by flow diversion. METHODS: A total of 18 patients with hemorrhage due to a ruptured BBAs and VSAs, treated with flow diversion between July 2014 and March 2016 were included in this study. We analyzed clinical and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 12 (66.7%) VSAs and 6 (33.3%) BBAs were treated with flow diversion. Fifteen (83.3%) and three (16.7%) aneurysms were located on the internal carotid artery and the basilar artery, respectively. On admission, a GCS score of 15 and WFNS grade 1 were found in 14 (77.7%) patients, 3 patients had an admission GCS of 13 and WFNS grade 2, one had an admission GCS of 8 and WFNS of 4. Fisher CT grades 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 11 (61.1%), 1 (5.6%), and 6 (33.3%) patients, respectively. Flow diversion was performed on average 5.6 days after onset of hemorrhage. 6 months post-intervention angiography showed complete obliteration of the aneurysms in all patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that flow diversion in the acute and subacute phase of hemorrhage is a reliable treatment for reducing complications in patients with BBAs and VSAs. In patients with poor clinical presentation it might be reasonable to delay treatment until the first signs of recovery become apparent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6819851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68198512019-11-04 Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms Ghorbani, Mohammad Griessenauer, Christoph J. Wipplinger, Christoph Azar, Maziar Shojaei, Hamidreza Bavand, Karan Khosravi, Darya Heliyon Article PURPOSE: Ruptured blood blisters (BBA) and very small, wide necked aneurysms (VSA) remain challenging lesions to treat due to their small size, wide necks, and thin, fragile walls. In the present study, we reviewed our experience with these aneurysms treated by flow diversion. METHODS: A total of 18 patients with hemorrhage due to a ruptured BBAs and VSAs, treated with flow diversion between July 2014 and March 2016 were included in this study. We analyzed clinical and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 12 (66.7%) VSAs and 6 (33.3%) BBAs were treated with flow diversion. Fifteen (83.3%) and three (16.7%) aneurysms were located on the internal carotid artery and the basilar artery, respectively. On admission, a GCS score of 15 and WFNS grade 1 were found in 14 (77.7%) patients, 3 patients had an admission GCS of 13 and WFNS grade 2, one had an admission GCS of 8 and WFNS of 4. Fisher CT grades 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 11 (61.1%), 1 (5.6%), and 6 (33.3%) patients, respectively. Flow diversion was performed on average 5.6 days after onset of hemorrhage. 6 months post-intervention angiography showed complete obliteration of the aneurysms in all patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that flow diversion in the acute and subacute phase of hemorrhage is a reliable treatment for reducing complications in patients with BBAs and VSAs. In patients with poor clinical presentation it might be reasonable to delay treatment until the first signs of recovery become apparent. Elsevier 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6819851/ /pubmed/31687529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02241 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ghorbani, Mohammad
Griessenauer, Christoph J.
Wipplinger, Christoph
Azar, Maziar
Shojaei, Hamidreza
Bavand, Karan
Khosravi, Darya
Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms
title Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms
title_full Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms
title_fullStr Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms
title_short Flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms
title_sort flow diverter embolization device for endovascular treatment of ruptured blister and wide necked very small aneurysms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6819851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02241
work_keys_str_mv AT ghorbanimohammad flowdiverterembolizationdeviceforendovasculartreatmentofrupturedblisterandwideneckedverysmallaneurysms
AT griessenauerchristophj flowdiverterembolizationdeviceforendovasculartreatmentofrupturedblisterandwideneckedverysmallaneurysms
AT wipplingerchristoph flowdiverterembolizationdeviceforendovasculartreatmentofrupturedblisterandwideneckedverysmallaneurysms
AT azarmaziar flowdiverterembolizationdeviceforendovasculartreatmentofrupturedblisterandwideneckedverysmallaneurysms
AT shojaeihamidreza flowdiverterembolizationdeviceforendovasculartreatmentofrupturedblisterandwideneckedverysmallaneurysms
AT bavandkaran flowdiverterembolizationdeviceforendovasculartreatmentofrupturedblisterandwideneckedverysmallaneurysms
AT khosravidarya flowdiverterembolizationdeviceforendovasculartreatmentofrupturedblisterandwideneckedverysmallaneurysms