Cargando…

Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions

BACKGROUND: The hip joint is the largest joint after the knee, which gives stability to the whole human structure. The hip joint consists of a femoral head which articulates with the acetabulum. Due to age and wear between the joints, these joints need to be replaced with implants which can function...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: K. N., Chethan, N., Shyamasunder Bhat, M., Zuber, B., Satish Shenoy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750264
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1210
_version_ 1783463858549030912
author K. N., Chethan
N., Shyamasunder Bhat
M., Zuber
B., Satish Shenoy
author_facet K. N., Chethan
N., Shyamasunder Bhat
M., Zuber
B., Satish Shenoy
author_sort K. N., Chethan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The hip joint is the largest joint after the knee, which gives stability to the whole human structure. The hip joint consists of a femoral head which articulates with the acetabulum. Due to age and wear between the joints, these joints need to be replaced with implants which can function just as a natural joint. Since the early 19(th) century, the hip joint arthroplasty has evolved, and many advances have been taken in the field which improved the whole procedure. Currently, there is a wide variety of implants available varying in the length of stem, shapes, and sizes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this analytical study of femur, circular, oval, ellipse and trapezoidal-shaped stem designs are considered in the present study. The human femur is modeled using Mimics. CATIA V-6 is used to model the implant models. Static structural analysis is carried out using ANSYS R-19 to evaluate the best implant design. RESULTS: All the four hip implants exhibited the von Mises stresses, lesser than its yielded strength. However, circular and trapezoidal-shaped stems have less von Mises stress compared to ellipse and oval. CONCLUSION: This study shows the behavior of different implant designs when their cross-sections are varied. Further, these implants can be considered for dynamic analysis considering different gait cycles. By optimizing the implant design, life expectancy of the implant can be improved, which will avoid the revision of the hip implant in active adult patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68200192019-11-20 Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions K. N., Chethan N., Shyamasunder Bhat M., Zuber B., Satish Shenoy J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: The hip joint is the largest joint after the knee, which gives stability to the whole human structure. The hip joint consists of a femoral head which articulates with the acetabulum. Due to age and wear between the joints, these joints need to be replaced with implants which can function just as a natural joint. Since the early 19(th) century, the hip joint arthroplasty has evolved, and many advances have been taken in the field which improved the whole procedure. Currently, there is a wide variety of implants available varying in the length of stem, shapes, and sizes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this analytical study of femur, circular, oval, ellipse and trapezoidal-shaped stem designs are considered in the present study. The human femur is modeled using Mimics. CATIA V-6 is used to model the implant models. Static structural analysis is carried out using ANSYS R-19 to evaluate the best implant design. RESULTS: All the four hip implants exhibited the von Mises stresses, lesser than its yielded strength. However, circular and trapezoidal-shaped stems have less von Mises stress compared to ellipse and oval. CONCLUSION: This study shows the behavior of different implant designs when their cross-sections are varied. Further, these implants can be considered for dynamic analysis considering different gait cycles. By optimizing the implant design, life expectancy of the implant can be improved, which will avoid the revision of the hip implant in active adult patients. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6820019/ /pubmed/31750264 http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1210 Text en Copyright: © Shiraz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
K. N., Chethan
N., Shyamasunder Bhat
M., Zuber
B., Satish Shenoy
Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions
title Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions
title_full Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions
title_short Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions
title_sort finite element analysis of different hip implant designs along with femur under static loading conditions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750264
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1210
work_keys_str_mv AT knchethan finiteelementanalysisofdifferenthipimplantdesignsalongwithfemurunderstaticloadingconditions
AT nshyamasunderbhat finiteelementanalysisofdifferenthipimplantdesignsalongwithfemurunderstaticloadingconditions
AT mzuber finiteelementanalysisofdifferenthipimplantdesignsalongwithfemurunderstaticloadingconditions
AT bsatishshenoy finiteelementanalysisofdifferenthipimplantdesignsalongwithfemurunderstaticloadingconditions