Cargando…

Remembering the order of serially presented objects: A matter of time?

Remembering the sequence, in which stimuli are encountered or events have occurred, is a key process in episodic memory and can also facilitate recognition memory. Rodents, when presented with a sequence of objects, will explore the object encountered first; yet, whether this behaviour is because th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barker, G.R.I., Evuarherhe, O., Warburton, E.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31815187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2398212819883088
_version_ 1783463878005358592
author Barker, G.R.I.
Evuarherhe, O.
Warburton, E.C.
author_facet Barker, G.R.I.
Evuarherhe, O.
Warburton, E.C.
author_sort Barker, G.R.I.
collection PubMed
description Remembering the sequence, in which stimuli are encountered or events have occurred, is a key process in episodic memory and can also facilitate recognition memory. Rodents, when presented with a sequence of objects, will explore the object encountered first; yet, whether this behaviour is because the rodents spontaneously encode the order of stimuli presentation or because of relative familiarity or temporal decay is unknown. Here, we tested sequence memory in rats using a series of spontaneous preference tasks. Experiment 1 demonstrated that when rats are presented with a sequence of four objects, with an inter-sample interval of 5 min or 1 h, they preferentially explored the object presented earlier in the list irrespective of the inter-sample interval. We then demonstrated that such memory for order was not affected by increasing or decreasing the inter-sample interval between the middle objects (Experiment 2). Finally, we showed that memory for order is not a function of absolute object familiarity, as animals showed clear discrimination between the objects presented in the sample phases and a novel object, independent of the sample objects’ position in the sequence (Experiment 3). These results show that animals are able to encode the order of objects presented in a sequence, and as such temporal order memory is not achieved using the process of relative or absolute familiarity or temporal decay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68201232019-12-04 Remembering the order of serially presented objects: A matter of time? Barker, G.R.I. Evuarherhe, O. Warburton, E.C. Brain Neurosci Adv Research Paper Remembering the sequence, in which stimuli are encountered or events have occurred, is a key process in episodic memory and can also facilitate recognition memory. Rodents, when presented with a sequence of objects, will explore the object encountered first; yet, whether this behaviour is because the rodents spontaneously encode the order of stimuli presentation or because of relative familiarity or temporal decay is unknown. Here, we tested sequence memory in rats using a series of spontaneous preference tasks. Experiment 1 demonstrated that when rats are presented with a sequence of four objects, with an inter-sample interval of 5 min or 1 h, they preferentially explored the object presented earlier in the list irrespective of the inter-sample interval. We then demonstrated that such memory for order was not affected by increasing or decreasing the inter-sample interval between the middle objects (Experiment 2). Finally, we showed that memory for order is not a function of absolute object familiarity, as animals showed clear discrimination between the objects presented in the sample phases and a novel object, independent of the sample objects’ position in the sequence (Experiment 3). These results show that animals are able to encode the order of objects presented in a sequence, and as such temporal order memory is not achieved using the process of relative or absolute familiarity or temporal decay. SAGE Publications 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6820123/ /pubmed/31815187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2398212819883088 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Barker, G.R.I.
Evuarherhe, O.
Warburton, E.C.
Remembering the order of serially presented objects: A matter of time?
title Remembering the order of serially presented objects: A matter of time?
title_full Remembering the order of serially presented objects: A matter of time?
title_fullStr Remembering the order of serially presented objects: A matter of time?
title_full_unstemmed Remembering the order of serially presented objects: A matter of time?
title_short Remembering the order of serially presented objects: A matter of time?
title_sort remembering the order of serially presented objects: a matter of time?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31815187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2398212819883088
work_keys_str_mv AT barkergri rememberingtheorderofseriallypresentedobjectsamatteroftime
AT evuarherheo rememberingtheorderofseriallypresentedobjectsamatteroftime
AT warburtonec rememberingtheorderofseriallypresentedobjectsamatteroftime