Cargando…
The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification
Current advances in assisted reproductive technologies aim to promote the health and well-being of future children. They offer the possibility to select embryos with the greatest potential of being born healthy (eg, preimplantation genetic testing) and may someday correct faulty genes responsible fo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31326898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105436 |
_version_ | 1783463881893478400 |
---|---|
author | Kleiderman, Erika Ravitsky, Vardit Knoppers, Bartha Maria |
author_facet | Kleiderman, Erika Ravitsky, Vardit Knoppers, Bartha Maria |
author_sort | Kleiderman, Erika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current advances in assisted reproductive technologies aim to promote the health and well-being of future children. They offer the possibility to select embryos with the greatest potential of being born healthy (eg, preimplantation genetic testing) and may someday correct faulty genes responsible for heritable diseases in the embryo (eg, human germline genome modification (HGGM)). Most laws and policy statements surrounding HGGM refer to the notion of ‘serious’ as a core criterion in determining what genetic diseases should be targeted by these technologies. Yet, this notion remains vague and poorly defined, rendering its application challenging and decision making subjective and arbitrary. By way of background, we begin by briefly presenting two conceptual approaches to ‘health’ and ‘disease’: objectivism (ie, based on biological facts) and constructivism (ie, based on human values). The basic challenge under both is sorting out whether and to what extent social and environmental factors have a role in helping to define what qualifies as a ‘serious’ disease beyond the medical criteria. We then focus on how a human rights framework (eg, right to science and right to the highest attainable health) could integrate the concepts of objectivism and constructivism so as to provide guidance for a more actionable consideration of ‘serious’. Ultimately, it could be argued that a human rights framework, by way of its legally binding nature and its globally accepted norms and values, provides a more universal foundation for discussions of the ethical, legal and social implications of emerging or disruptive technologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6820154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68201542019-11-13 The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification Kleiderman, Erika Ravitsky, Vardit Knoppers, Bartha Maria J Med Ethics Current Controversy Current advances in assisted reproductive technologies aim to promote the health and well-being of future children. They offer the possibility to select embryos with the greatest potential of being born healthy (eg, preimplantation genetic testing) and may someday correct faulty genes responsible for heritable diseases in the embryo (eg, human germline genome modification (HGGM)). Most laws and policy statements surrounding HGGM refer to the notion of ‘serious’ as a core criterion in determining what genetic diseases should be targeted by these technologies. Yet, this notion remains vague and poorly defined, rendering its application challenging and decision making subjective and arbitrary. By way of background, we begin by briefly presenting two conceptual approaches to ‘health’ and ‘disease’: objectivism (ie, based on biological facts) and constructivism (ie, based on human values). The basic challenge under both is sorting out whether and to what extent social and environmental factors have a role in helping to define what qualifies as a ‘serious’ disease beyond the medical criteria. We then focus on how a human rights framework (eg, right to science and right to the highest attainable health) could integrate the concepts of objectivism and constructivism so as to provide guidance for a more actionable consideration of ‘serious’. Ultimately, it could be argued that a human rights framework, by way of its legally binding nature and its globally accepted norms and values, provides a more universal foundation for discussions of the ethical, legal and social implications of emerging or disruptive technologies. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08 2019-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6820154/ /pubmed/31326898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105436 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Current Controversy Kleiderman, Erika Ravitsky, Vardit Knoppers, Bartha Maria The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification |
title | The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification |
title_full | The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification |
title_fullStr | The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification |
title_full_unstemmed | The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification |
title_short | The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification |
title_sort | ‘serious’ factor in germline modification |
topic | Current Controversy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31326898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleidermanerika theseriousfactoringermlinemodification AT ravitskyvardit theseriousfactoringermlinemodification AT knoppersbarthamaria theseriousfactoringermlinemodification AT kleidermanerika seriousfactoringermlinemodification AT ravitskyvardit seriousfactoringermlinemodification AT knoppersbarthamaria seriousfactoringermlinemodification |