Cargando…

The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). METHODS: Patients (n = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidiscip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yohannes, Abebaw Mengistu, Dryden, Sheila, Hanania, Nicola Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206
_version_ 1783463887727755264
author Yohannes, Abebaw Mengistu
Dryden, Sheila
Hanania, Nicola Alexander
author_facet Yohannes, Abebaw Mengistu
Dryden, Sheila
Hanania, Nicola Alexander
author_sort Yohannes, Abebaw Mengistu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). METHODS: Patients (n = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidisciplinary PR, comprising 2 h (1 h exercise and 1 h education) weekly. Anxiety, exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea, fatigue were measured pre- and post-PR, utilizing the Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR), Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and MCFS, respectively. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of participants was 72 (8) years, and 50% were women. Total MCFS score fell after PR mean (95% confidence interval) −4.89 (–7.90 to −3.79) as did domain scores: physical −1.89 (–2.33 to −1.46), cognition −1.37 (–1.65 to −1.09), and psychosocial −1.62 (–2.00 to −1.62). Total MCFS effect size (ES) was 0.55; and for domains, physical was 0.52, cognition was 0.59, and psychosocial was 0.51. The ES for AIR was 0.30, mMRC was 0.38, SGRQ was 0.66, and ISWT was 1.19. MCFS changes correlated with changes in both SGRQ (p < 0.002) and AIR (p < 0.004), but not ISWT (p = 0.30) or mMRC (p = 0.18). The AIR, SGRQ, mMRC, and ISWT all improved after PR (all, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The MCFS scale is a valid and responsive scale to measure fatigue in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68201782019-11-06 The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation Yohannes, Abebaw Mengistu Dryden, Sheila Hanania, Nicola Alexander Ther Adv Chronic Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: We examined the responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Fatigue Scale (MCFS) in patients with COPD following 8 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). METHODS: Patients (n = 273) with clinically stable COPD completed 8 weeks of outpatient multidisciplinary PR, comprising 2 h (1 h exercise and 1 h education) weekly. Anxiety, exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea, fatigue were measured pre- and post-PR, utilizing the Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR), Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and MCFS, respectively. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of participants was 72 (8) years, and 50% were women. Total MCFS score fell after PR mean (95% confidence interval) −4.89 (–7.90 to −3.79) as did domain scores: physical −1.89 (–2.33 to −1.46), cognition −1.37 (–1.65 to −1.09), and psychosocial −1.62 (–2.00 to −1.62). Total MCFS effect size (ES) was 0.55; and for domains, physical was 0.52, cognition was 0.59, and psychosocial was 0.51. The ES for AIR was 0.30, mMRC was 0.38, SGRQ was 0.66, and ISWT was 1.19. MCFS changes correlated with changes in both SGRQ (p < 0.002) and AIR (p < 0.004), but not ISWT (p = 0.30) or mMRC (p = 0.18). The AIR, SGRQ, mMRC, and ISWT all improved after PR (all, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The MCFS scale is a valid and responsive scale to measure fatigue in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation. SAGE Publications 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6820178/ /pubmed/31695862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yohannes, Abebaw Mengistu
Dryden, Sheila
Hanania, Nicola Alexander
The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_full The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_fullStr The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_short The responsiveness of the Manchester Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fatigue Scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
title_sort responsiveness of the manchester chronic obstructive pulmonary disease fatigue scale to pulmonary rehabilitation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040622319882206
work_keys_str_mv AT yohannesabebawmengistu theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT drydensheila theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT hananianicolaalexander theresponsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT yohannesabebawmengistu responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT drydensheila responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT hananianicolaalexander responsivenessofthemanchesterchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasefatiguescaletopulmonaryrehabilitation