Cargando…

Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor’s Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the detailed motives, concerns, and psychological defensiveness of living liver donor candidates in a Korean population. MATERIAL/METHODS: We analyzed data of 102 donor candidates obtained from routine psychosocial evaluation for living donor live...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryu, Seunghyong, Yoon, Se Chang, Hong, Ki Eun, Kim, Jong Man
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624226
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.916340
_version_ 1783463919503802368
author Ryu, Seunghyong
Yoon, Se Chang
Hong, Ki Eun
Kim, Jong Man
author_facet Ryu, Seunghyong
Yoon, Se Chang
Hong, Ki Eun
Kim, Jong Man
author_sort Ryu, Seunghyong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the detailed motives, concerns, and psychological defensiveness of living liver donor candidates in a Korean population. MATERIAL/METHODS: We analyzed data of 102 donor candidates obtained from routine psychosocial evaluation for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using descriptive methods. Donor candidates completed 2 questionnaires regarding their motivations and concerns, as well as a validity scale, the K scale from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. RESULTS: Donor candidates were more likely to cite family-related issues (77.5% to 94.1%) including well-being of the whole family and family affection as the reasons for their liver donation rather than personal motives (38.2% to 57.8%). Donors were also more likely to concern about the recipient’s survival and recovery (52.9% to 58.8%) rather than their own difficulties such as surgical complications and occupational disadvantages (19.6% to 38.2%). Twenty-six donors (25.5%) took a psychologically defensive attitude (T-score of K scale ≥65) during the pre-donation evaluation. Psychologically defensive donors expressed a significantly lower level of concern about liver donation compared to non-defensive donors (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We need to pay more attention to the family-related issues and psychological defensiveness of living liver donor candidates when evaluating psychosocial status before LDLT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68203472019-11-01 Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor’s Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Ryu, Seunghyong Yoon, Se Chang Hong, Ki Eun Kim, Jong Man Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the detailed motives, concerns, and psychological defensiveness of living liver donor candidates in a Korean population. MATERIAL/METHODS: We analyzed data of 102 donor candidates obtained from routine psychosocial evaluation for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using descriptive methods. Donor candidates completed 2 questionnaires regarding their motivations and concerns, as well as a validity scale, the K scale from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. RESULTS: Donor candidates were more likely to cite family-related issues (77.5% to 94.1%) including well-being of the whole family and family affection as the reasons for their liver donation rather than personal motives (38.2% to 57.8%). Donors were also more likely to concern about the recipient’s survival and recovery (52.9% to 58.8%) rather than their own difficulties such as surgical complications and occupational disadvantages (19.6% to 38.2%). Twenty-six donors (25.5%) took a psychologically defensive attitude (T-score of K scale ≥65) during the pre-donation evaluation. Psychologically defensive donors expressed a significantly lower level of concern about liver donation compared to non-defensive donors (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We need to pay more attention to the family-related issues and psychological defensiveness of living liver donor candidates when evaluating psychosocial status before LDLT. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6820347/ /pubmed/31624226 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.916340 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2019 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ryu, Seunghyong
Yoon, Se Chang
Hong, Ki Eun
Kim, Jong Man
Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor’s Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor’s Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_full Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor’s Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_fullStr Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor’s Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor’s Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_short Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor’s Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_sort psychosocial issues related to donor’s decision-making in living donor liver transplantation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31624226
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.916340
work_keys_str_mv AT ryuseunghyong psychosocialissuesrelatedtodonorsdecisionmakinginlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT yoonsechang psychosocialissuesrelatedtodonorsdecisionmakinginlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hongkieun psychosocialissuesrelatedtodonorsdecisionmakinginlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT kimjongman psychosocialissuesrelatedtodonorsdecisionmakinginlivingdonorlivertransplantation