Cargando…
Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective
AIM: To compare the efficacy of pre-incision intravenous single doses of cefazolin versus cefazolin plus azithromycin as an antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: This was a single-center, double blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in the PGIMER, Chandigarh. 200 women un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_593_19 |
_version_ | 1783463939017801728 |
---|---|
author | Jyothi, Manjeera S. Kalra, Jasvinder K. Arora, Aashima Patil, Amol Suri, Vanita Jain, Vanita Shafiq, Nusrat Saini, Shiv S. Gautam, Vikas |
author_facet | Jyothi, Manjeera S. Kalra, Jasvinder K. Arora, Aashima Patil, Amol Suri, Vanita Jain, Vanita Shafiq, Nusrat Saini, Shiv S. Gautam, Vikas |
author_sort | Jyothi, Manjeera S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the efficacy of pre-incision intravenous single doses of cefazolin versus cefazolin plus azithromycin as an antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: This was a single-center, double blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in the PGIMER, Chandigarh. 200 women undergoing elective/emergency cesarean section were randomized. Group A received single dose of cefazolin plus placebo while Group B received single dose of cefazolin plus azithromycin. Primary outcome evaluated was occurrence of surgical site infections (SSI); secondary outcomes included incidence of febrile morbidity, UTI, endometritis, neonatal outcome, total cost of antibiotics, and duration of hospital stay in both the study arms. Descriptive statistics and χ(2) tests were used for analysis of the data. RESULT: There was an overall significant reduction in the incidence of SSI (15% vs 3%; P = 0.03), endometritis (8% vs 2%; P = 0.048), and post-operative febrile morbidity (17% vs 3%; P = 0.001) with the addition of azithromycin to cefazolin. Duration of hospital stay was almost two days lesser for the cefazolin plus azithromycin group. Subgroup analysis of patients with SSI showed the age, duration of ruptured membranes, and type of anesthesia as important predictors of infection rate. Study observed statistically significant reduction in requirement of additional post operative antibiotics, phototherapy for neonates, hospital stay and cost of therapy in cefazolin plus azithromycin group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tertiary care hospitals in developing countries such as India can opt for the cefazolin plus azithromycin as antimicrobial prophylaxis during CD to maximize the efficacy as well as for decreasing the cost burden of postoperative infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6820430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68204302019-11-01 Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective Jyothi, Manjeera S. Kalra, Jasvinder K. Arora, Aashima Patil, Amol Suri, Vanita Jain, Vanita Shafiq, Nusrat Saini, Shiv S. Gautam, Vikas J Family Med Prim Care Original Article AIM: To compare the efficacy of pre-incision intravenous single doses of cefazolin versus cefazolin plus azithromycin as an antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: This was a single-center, double blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in the PGIMER, Chandigarh. 200 women undergoing elective/emergency cesarean section were randomized. Group A received single dose of cefazolin plus placebo while Group B received single dose of cefazolin plus azithromycin. Primary outcome evaluated was occurrence of surgical site infections (SSI); secondary outcomes included incidence of febrile morbidity, UTI, endometritis, neonatal outcome, total cost of antibiotics, and duration of hospital stay in both the study arms. Descriptive statistics and χ(2) tests were used for analysis of the data. RESULT: There was an overall significant reduction in the incidence of SSI (15% vs 3%; P = 0.03), endometritis (8% vs 2%; P = 0.048), and post-operative febrile morbidity (17% vs 3%; P = 0.001) with the addition of azithromycin to cefazolin. Duration of hospital stay was almost two days lesser for the cefazolin plus azithromycin group. Subgroup analysis of patients with SSI showed the age, duration of ruptured membranes, and type of anesthesia as important predictors of infection rate. Study observed statistically significant reduction in requirement of additional post operative antibiotics, phototherapy for neonates, hospital stay and cost of therapy in cefazolin plus azithromycin group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tertiary care hospitals in developing countries such as India can opt for the cefazolin plus azithromycin as antimicrobial prophylaxis during CD to maximize the efficacy as well as for decreasing the cost burden of postoperative infections. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6820430/ /pubmed/31681684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_593_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jyothi, Manjeera S. Kalra, Jasvinder K. Arora, Aashima Patil, Amol Suri, Vanita Jain, Vanita Shafiq, Nusrat Saini, Shiv S. Gautam, Vikas Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective |
title | Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective |
title_full | Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective |
title_fullStr | Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective |
title_short | Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: a developing country's perspective |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_593_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jyothimanjeeras randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective AT kalrajasvinderk randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective AT aroraaashima randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective AT patilamol randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective AT surivanita randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective AT jainvanita randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective AT shafiqnusrat randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective AT sainishivs randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective AT gautamvikas randomizedcontrolledtrialofcefazolinmonotherapyversuscefazolinplusazithromycinsingledoseprophylaxisforcesareandeliveriesadevelopingcountrysperspective |