Cargando…

Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice

In 2011, the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine selected serum collagen type‐I crosslinked C‐peptide (s‐CTX) as the reference standard for bone resorption. This study aimed to determine the within and between laborator...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hindi, Sahar M, Vittinghoff, Eric, Schafer, Anne L, Silverman, Stuart, Bauer, Douglas C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10225
_version_ 1783463947683233792
author Hindi, Sahar M
Vittinghoff, Eric
Schafer, Anne L
Silverman, Stuart
Bauer, Douglas C
author_facet Hindi, Sahar M
Vittinghoff, Eric
Schafer, Anne L
Silverman, Stuart
Bauer, Douglas C
author_sort Hindi, Sahar M
collection PubMed
description In 2011, the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine selected serum collagen type‐I crosslinked C‐peptide (s‐CTX) as the reference standard for bone resorption. This study aimed to determine the within and between laboratory reproducibility for s‐CTX assays. To create standardized pools, serum was collected from 10 premenopausal and 10 postmenopausal women. Premenopausal sera were pooled to approximate a population with normal bone turnover; postmenopausal sera were pooled to approximate a population with high bone turnover; and a third pool was created from an equal proportion of the pre‐ and postmenopausal pools. Multiple identical aliquots from each pool were created and frozen; all were labeled as routine clinical specimens. To evaluate longitudinal laboratory reproducibility, an identical aliquot from each of the three pools was sent to four US commercial laboratories on five dates over a 6‐month period. To evaluate within‐run reproducibility, each lab received five identical aliquots from each pool on the fifth date. Three labs (Mayo, ARUP, and Quest) used the Roche Diagnostics Elecsys assay, and one (Esoterix/LabCorp) used the IDS‐iSYS assay. Reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Labs were unaware of the investigation. Across labs, mean s‐CTX values were 423, 533, and 480 pg/mL for the premenopausal, postmenopausal, and mixed pools, respectively, but the means differed between labs (p < 0.001). The premenopausal pool longitudinal CVs ranged from 5.0% to 14.9%; the postmenopausal pool CVs ranged from 3.4% to 19.3%; and the mixed pool CVs ranged from 3.3% to 16.0%. The longitudinal reproducibility for Esoterix/LabCorp was higher (CV 13.9%; 95% CI, 10.1% to 22.2%) than for the other labs. Within‐run CVs were also higher for Esoterix/LabCorp (CV 8.6%; 95% CI, 6.3% to 13.6%) compared with the other labs (CVs 2.1% to 6.2%). In conclusion, the reproducibility of s‐CTX varied across US commercial labs, and was poorer for Esoterix/LabCorp, which used the IDS assay, compared with the other three labs, which used the Roche assay. © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68204592019-11-04 Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice Hindi, Sahar M Vittinghoff, Eric Schafer, Anne L Silverman, Stuart Bauer, Douglas C JBMR Plus Original Articles In 2011, the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine selected serum collagen type‐I crosslinked C‐peptide (s‐CTX) as the reference standard for bone resorption. This study aimed to determine the within and between laboratory reproducibility for s‐CTX assays. To create standardized pools, serum was collected from 10 premenopausal and 10 postmenopausal women. Premenopausal sera were pooled to approximate a population with normal bone turnover; postmenopausal sera were pooled to approximate a population with high bone turnover; and a third pool was created from an equal proportion of the pre‐ and postmenopausal pools. Multiple identical aliquots from each pool were created and frozen; all were labeled as routine clinical specimens. To evaluate longitudinal laboratory reproducibility, an identical aliquot from each of the three pools was sent to four US commercial laboratories on five dates over a 6‐month period. To evaluate within‐run reproducibility, each lab received five identical aliquots from each pool on the fifth date. Three labs (Mayo, ARUP, and Quest) used the Roche Diagnostics Elecsys assay, and one (Esoterix/LabCorp) used the IDS‐iSYS assay. Reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Labs were unaware of the investigation. Across labs, mean s‐CTX values were 423, 533, and 480 pg/mL for the premenopausal, postmenopausal, and mixed pools, respectively, but the means differed between labs (p < 0.001). The premenopausal pool longitudinal CVs ranged from 5.0% to 14.9%; the postmenopausal pool CVs ranged from 3.4% to 19.3%; and the mixed pool CVs ranged from 3.3% to 16.0%. The longitudinal reproducibility for Esoterix/LabCorp was higher (CV 13.9%; 95% CI, 10.1% to 22.2%) than for the other labs. Within‐run CVs were also higher for Esoterix/LabCorp (CV 8.6%; 95% CI, 6.3% to 13.6%) compared with the other labs (CVs 2.1% to 6.2%). In conclusion, the reproducibility of s‐CTX varied across US commercial labs, and was poorer for Esoterix/LabCorp, which used the IDS assay, compared with the other three labs, which used the Roche assay. © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6820459/ /pubmed/31687653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10225 Text en © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hindi, Sahar M
Vittinghoff, Eric
Schafer, Anne L
Silverman, Stuart
Bauer, Douglas C
Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice
title Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice
title_full Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice
title_short Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice
title_sort commercial laboratory reproducibility of serum ctx in clinical practice
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10225
work_keys_str_mv AT hindisaharm commerciallaboratoryreproducibilityofserumctxinclinicalpractice
AT vittinghofferic commerciallaboratoryreproducibilityofserumctxinclinicalpractice
AT schaferannel commerciallaboratoryreproducibilityofserumctxinclinicalpractice
AT silvermanstuart commerciallaboratoryreproducibilityofserumctxinclinicalpractice
AT bauerdouglasc commerciallaboratoryreproducibilityofserumctxinclinicalpractice