Cargando…

The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate by light microscopy analysis the effect of the use of miniaturised piezoelectric tips versus mini‐five area specific curets on calculus removal and postoperative root surface alterations. METHODS: A total of 20 extracted teeth were used. Two square s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Profili, Fabia, Sparabombe, Scilla, Tawse Smith, Andrew, D'Isidoro, Orlando, Quaranta, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.218
_version_ 1783463979407900672
author Profili, Fabia
Sparabombe, Scilla
Tawse Smith, Andrew
D'Isidoro, Orlando
Quaranta, Alessandro
author_facet Profili, Fabia
Sparabombe, Scilla
Tawse Smith, Andrew
D'Isidoro, Orlando
Quaranta, Alessandro
author_sort Profili, Fabia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate by light microscopy analysis the effect of the use of miniaturised piezoelectric tips versus mini‐five area specific curets on calculus removal and postoperative root surface alterations. METHODS: A total of 20 extracted teeth were used. Two square surfaces (5×5 mm) were marked on each root surface with a diamond bur mounted on a high‐speed handpiece. Before and after instrumentation, a series of magnified images (4.2×) of each experimental surface were taken with a standardized approach. According to a randomization list, the two surfaces on each sample were instrumented in a standardised fashion either with a mine‐five curet or a slim piezoelectric tip. The images were processed using an imaging software. Data were summarised as means and standard deviations for the two outcomes (calculus and alterations.) at each time (pre and post) for both of the groups (manual and mechanical). RESULTS: Both manual and mechanical instrumentation significantly reduced the calculus deposits (p < .001) without significant differences between the two groups. Both manual and mechanical treatments significantly increased alterations (p < .01). There was a statistically significant evidence of a greater increase in alterations from mechanical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Slim mechanical piezoelectric tips and manual mini‐five area‐specific curets have similar effects on calculus removal. Manual instrumentation results in a more homogeneous postoperative root surface with less root alterations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68205832019-11-04 The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study Profili, Fabia Sparabombe, Scilla Tawse Smith, Andrew D'Isidoro, Orlando Quaranta, Alessandro Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate by light microscopy analysis the effect of the use of miniaturised piezoelectric tips versus mini‐five area specific curets on calculus removal and postoperative root surface alterations. METHODS: A total of 20 extracted teeth were used. Two square surfaces (5×5 mm) were marked on each root surface with a diamond bur mounted on a high‐speed handpiece. Before and after instrumentation, a series of magnified images (4.2×) of each experimental surface were taken with a standardized approach. According to a randomization list, the two surfaces on each sample were instrumented in a standardised fashion either with a mine‐five curet or a slim piezoelectric tip. The images were processed using an imaging software. Data were summarised as means and standard deviations for the two outcomes (calculus and alterations.) at each time (pre and post) for both of the groups (manual and mechanical). RESULTS: Both manual and mechanical instrumentation significantly reduced the calculus deposits (p < .001) without significant differences between the two groups. Both manual and mechanical treatments significantly increased alterations (p < .01). There was a statistically significant evidence of a greater increase in alterations from mechanical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Slim mechanical piezoelectric tips and manual mini‐five area‐specific curets have similar effects on calculus removal. Manual instrumentation results in a more homogeneous postoperative root surface with less root alterations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6820583/ /pubmed/31687186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.218 Text en ©2019 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Profili, Fabia
Sparabombe, Scilla
Tawse Smith, Andrew
D'Isidoro, Orlando
Quaranta, Alessandro
The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study
title The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study
title_full The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study
title_fullStr The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study
title_short The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study
title_sort effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: an in vitro light microscopic study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31687186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.218
work_keys_str_mv AT profilifabia theeffectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT sparabombescilla theeffectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT tawsesmithandrew theeffectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT disidoroorlando theeffectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT quarantaalessandro theeffectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT profilifabia effectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT sparabombescilla effectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT tawsesmithandrew effectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT disidoroorlando effectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy
AT quarantaalessandro effectofminiaturizedmanualversusmechanicalinstrumentsoncalculusremovalandrootsurfacecharacteristicsaninvitrolightmicroscopicstudy