Cargando…

Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers

INTRODUCTION: The learning environment refers to the physical, pedagogical, and psychosocial contexts in which learning occurs and critically influences the educational experience of trainees in the health professions. However, the manner in which individual faculty explicitly organize the education...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaffe, Lynn E., Lindell, Deborah, Sullivan, Amy M., Huang, Grace C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31562637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00536-5
_version_ 1783463991466524672
author Jaffe, Lynn E.
Lindell, Deborah
Sullivan, Amy M.
Huang, Grace C.
author_facet Jaffe, Lynn E.
Lindell, Deborah
Sullivan, Amy M.
Huang, Grace C.
author_sort Jaffe, Lynn E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The learning environment refers to the physical, pedagogical, and psychosocial contexts in which learning occurs and critically influences the educational experience of trainees in the health professions. However, the manner in which individual faculty explicitly organize the educational setting to facilitate learning of essential competencies such as critical thinking deserves more examination; lack of attention to this component can undermine the formal curriculum. The purpose of our study was to examine how faculty shape the learning environment to advance their learners’ development of critical thinking. METHODS: We took a constructivist grounded theory approach using the framework method for qualitative content analysis. Data were derived from interviews conducted with 44 faculty identified as skilled teachers of critical thinking at eight academic health professions institutions. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged regarding participants’ descriptions of their experiences of how they optimized the learning environment to support critical thinking: 1) Setting the atmosphere (establishing ground rules, focusing on process rather than answers, and building trust), 2) Maintaining the climate (gently pushing learners, tolerating discomfort, and adjusting to learner level), and 3) Weathering the storm (responses to challenges to learning critical thinking, including time and effort, negative evaluations, and resistance to effortful learning). DISCUSSION: An optimal learning environment for critical thinking was actively created by faculty to establish a safe environment and shared understanding of expectations. Understanding how to produce a conducive learning climate is paramount in teaching essential topics such as critical thinking. These findings have potential utility for faculty development initiatives to optimize the learning environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-019-00536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68206472019-11-06 Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers Jaffe, Lynn E. Lindell, Deborah Sullivan, Amy M. Huang, Grace C. Perspect Med Educ Original Article INTRODUCTION: The learning environment refers to the physical, pedagogical, and psychosocial contexts in which learning occurs and critically influences the educational experience of trainees in the health professions. However, the manner in which individual faculty explicitly organize the educational setting to facilitate learning of essential competencies such as critical thinking deserves more examination; lack of attention to this component can undermine the formal curriculum. The purpose of our study was to examine how faculty shape the learning environment to advance their learners’ development of critical thinking. METHODS: We took a constructivist grounded theory approach using the framework method for qualitative content analysis. Data were derived from interviews conducted with 44 faculty identified as skilled teachers of critical thinking at eight academic health professions institutions. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged regarding participants’ descriptions of their experiences of how they optimized the learning environment to support critical thinking: 1) Setting the atmosphere (establishing ground rules, focusing on process rather than answers, and building trust), 2) Maintaining the climate (gently pushing learners, tolerating discomfort, and adjusting to learner level), and 3) Weathering the storm (responses to challenges to learning critical thinking, including time and effort, negative evaluations, and resistance to effortful learning). DISCUSSION: An optimal learning environment for critical thinking was actively created by faculty to establish a safe environment and shared understanding of expectations. Understanding how to produce a conducive learning climate is paramount in teaching essential topics such as critical thinking. These findings have potential utility for faculty development initiatives to optimize the learning environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-019-00536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019-09-27 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6820647/ /pubmed/31562637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00536-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jaffe, Lynn E.
Lindell, Deborah
Sullivan, Amy M.
Huang, Grace C.
Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers
title Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers
title_full Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers
title_fullStr Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers
title_full_unstemmed Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers
title_short Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers
title_sort clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31562637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00536-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jaffelynne clearskiesaheadoptimizingthelearningenvironmentforcriticalthinkingfromaqualitativeanalysisofinterviewswithexpertteachers
AT lindelldeborah clearskiesaheadoptimizingthelearningenvironmentforcriticalthinkingfromaqualitativeanalysisofinterviewswithexpertteachers
AT sullivanamym clearskiesaheadoptimizingthelearningenvironmentforcriticalthinkingfromaqualitativeanalysisofinterviewswithexpertteachers
AT huanggracec clearskiesaheadoptimizingthelearningenvironmentforcriticalthinkingfromaqualitativeanalysisofinterviewswithexpertteachers