Cargando…

NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems

This article presents system performance studies of the CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET according to NEMA NU 2-2012 (for whole-body PETs) and NU 4-2008 (for preclinical PETs). This scanner is based on monolithic LYSO crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. The results obtained for both protoco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moliner, Laura, Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J., Catret, Juan V., González, Antonio, Ilisie, Víctor, Benlloch, José M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51898-z
_version_ 1783464012049022976
author Moliner, Laura
Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J.
Catret, Juan V.
González, Antonio
Ilisie, Víctor
Benlloch, José M.
author_facet Moliner, Laura
Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J.
Catret, Juan V.
González, Antonio
Ilisie, Víctor
Benlloch, José M.
author_sort Moliner, Laura
collection PubMed
description This article presents system performance studies of the CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET according to NEMA NU 2-2012 (for whole-body PETs) and NU 4-2008 (for preclinical PETs). This scanner is based on monolithic LYSO crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. The results obtained for both protocols are compared with current commercial whole body PETs and dedicated brain PETs found in the literature. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, NECR and scatter-fraction are characterized with NEMA standards, as well as an image quality study. A customized image quality phantom is proposed as NEMA phantoms do not fulfil the necessities of dedicated brain PETs. The full-width half maximum of the radial/tangential/axial spatial resolution of CareMiBrain reconstructed with FBP at 10 and 100 mm from the system center were, respectively, 1.87/1.68/1.39 mm and 1.86/1.91/1.40 mm (NU 2-2012) and 1.58/1.45/1.40 mm and 1.64/1.66/1.44 mm (NU 4-2008). Peak NECR was 49 kcps@287 MBq with a scatter fraction of 48% using NU 2-2012 phantom. The sensitivity was 13.82 cps/kBq at the center of the FOV (NU 2-2012) and 10% (NU 4-2008). Contrast recovery coefficients for customizing image quality phantom were 0.73/0.78/1.14/1.01 for the 4.5/6/9/12 mm diameter rods. The performance characteristics of CareMiBrain are at the top of the current technologies for PET systems. Dedicated brain PET systems significantly improve spatial resolution and sensitivity, but present worse results in count rate measurements and scatter-fraction tests. As for the comparison of preclinical and clinical standards, the results obtained for solid and liquid sources were similar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68207632019-11-04 NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems Moliner, Laura Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J. Catret, Juan V. González, Antonio Ilisie, Víctor Benlloch, José M. Sci Rep Article This article presents system performance studies of the CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET according to NEMA NU 2-2012 (for whole-body PETs) and NU 4-2008 (for preclinical PETs). This scanner is based on monolithic LYSO crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. The results obtained for both protocols are compared with current commercial whole body PETs and dedicated brain PETs found in the literature. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, NECR and scatter-fraction are characterized with NEMA standards, as well as an image quality study. A customized image quality phantom is proposed as NEMA phantoms do not fulfil the necessities of dedicated brain PETs. The full-width half maximum of the radial/tangential/axial spatial resolution of CareMiBrain reconstructed with FBP at 10 and 100 mm from the system center were, respectively, 1.87/1.68/1.39 mm and 1.86/1.91/1.40 mm (NU 2-2012) and 1.58/1.45/1.40 mm and 1.64/1.66/1.44 mm (NU 4-2008). Peak NECR was 49 kcps@287 MBq with a scatter fraction of 48% using NU 2-2012 phantom. The sensitivity was 13.82 cps/kBq at the center of the FOV (NU 2-2012) and 10% (NU 4-2008). Contrast recovery coefficients for customizing image quality phantom were 0.73/0.78/1.14/1.01 for the 4.5/6/9/12 mm diameter rods. The performance characteristics of CareMiBrain are at the top of the current technologies for PET systems. Dedicated brain PET systems significantly improve spatial resolution and sensitivity, but present worse results in count rate measurements and scatter-fraction tests. As for the comparison of preclinical and clinical standards, the results obtained for solid and liquid sources were similar. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6820763/ /pubmed/31664096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51898-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Moliner, Laura
Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J.
Catret, Juan V.
González, Antonio
Ilisie, Víctor
Benlloch, José M.
NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems
title NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems
title_full NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems
title_fullStr NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems
title_full_unstemmed NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems
title_short NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems
title_sort nema performance evaluation of caremibrain dedicated brain pet and comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain pet systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51898-z
work_keys_str_mv AT molinerlaura nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems
AT rodriguezalvarezmariaj nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems
AT catretjuanv nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems
AT gonzalezantonio nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems
AT ilisievictor nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems
AT benllochjosem nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems