Cargando…
NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems
This article presents system performance studies of the CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET according to NEMA NU 2-2012 (for whole-body PETs) and NU 4-2008 (for preclinical PETs). This scanner is based on monolithic LYSO crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. The results obtained for both protoco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51898-z |
_version_ | 1783464012049022976 |
---|---|
author | Moliner, Laura Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J. Catret, Juan V. González, Antonio Ilisie, Víctor Benlloch, José M. |
author_facet | Moliner, Laura Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J. Catret, Juan V. González, Antonio Ilisie, Víctor Benlloch, José M. |
author_sort | Moliner, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article presents system performance studies of the CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET according to NEMA NU 2-2012 (for whole-body PETs) and NU 4-2008 (for preclinical PETs). This scanner is based on monolithic LYSO crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. The results obtained for both protocols are compared with current commercial whole body PETs and dedicated brain PETs found in the literature. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, NECR and scatter-fraction are characterized with NEMA standards, as well as an image quality study. A customized image quality phantom is proposed as NEMA phantoms do not fulfil the necessities of dedicated brain PETs. The full-width half maximum of the radial/tangential/axial spatial resolution of CareMiBrain reconstructed with FBP at 10 and 100 mm from the system center were, respectively, 1.87/1.68/1.39 mm and 1.86/1.91/1.40 mm (NU 2-2012) and 1.58/1.45/1.40 mm and 1.64/1.66/1.44 mm (NU 4-2008). Peak NECR was 49 kcps@287 MBq with a scatter fraction of 48% using NU 2-2012 phantom. The sensitivity was 13.82 cps/kBq at the center of the FOV (NU 2-2012) and 10% (NU 4-2008). Contrast recovery coefficients for customizing image quality phantom were 0.73/0.78/1.14/1.01 for the 4.5/6/9/12 mm diameter rods. The performance characteristics of CareMiBrain are at the top of the current technologies for PET systems. Dedicated brain PET systems significantly improve spatial resolution and sensitivity, but present worse results in count rate measurements and scatter-fraction tests. As for the comparison of preclinical and clinical standards, the results obtained for solid and liquid sources were similar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6820763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68207632019-11-04 NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems Moliner, Laura Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J. Catret, Juan V. González, Antonio Ilisie, Víctor Benlloch, José M. Sci Rep Article This article presents system performance studies of the CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET according to NEMA NU 2-2012 (for whole-body PETs) and NU 4-2008 (for preclinical PETs). This scanner is based on monolithic LYSO crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. The results obtained for both protocols are compared with current commercial whole body PETs and dedicated brain PETs found in the literature. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, NECR and scatter-fraction are characterized with NEMA standards, as well as an image quality study. A customized image quality phantom is proposed as NEMA phantoms do not fulfil the necessities of dedicated brain PETs. The full-width half maximum of the radial/tangential/axial spatial resolution of CareMiBrain reconstructed with FBP at 10 and 100 mm from the system center were, respectively, 1.87/1.68/1.39 mm and 1.86/1.91/1.40 mm (NU 2-2012) and 1.58/1.45/1.40 mm and 1.64/1.66/1.44 mm (NU 4-2008). Peak NECR was 49 kcps@287 MBq with a scatter fraction of 48% using NU 2-2012 phantom. The sensitivity was 13.82 cps/kBq at the center of the FOV (NU 2-2012) and 10% (NU 4-2008). Contrast recovery coefficients for customizing image quality phantom were 0.73/0.78/1.14/1.01 for the 4.5/6/9/12 mm diameter rods. The performance characteristics of CareMiBrain are at the top of the current technologies for PET systems. Dedicated brain PET systems significantly improve spatial resolution and sensitivity, but present worse results in count rate measurements and scatter-fraction tests. As for the comparison of preclinical and clinical standards, the results obtained for solid and liquid sources were similar. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6820763/ /pubmed/31664096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51898-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Moliner, Laura Rodríguez-Alvarez, Maria J. Catret, Juan V. González, Antonio Ilisie, Víctor Benlloch, José M. NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems |
title | NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems |
title_full | NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems |
title_fullStr | NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems |
title_full_unstemmed | NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems |
title_short | NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems |
title_sort | nema performance evaluation of caremibrain dedicated brain pet and comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain pet systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51898-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molinerlaura nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems AT rodriguezalvarezmariaj nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems AT catretjuanv nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems AT gonzalezantonio nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems AT ilisievictor nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems AT benllochjosem nemaperformanceevaluationofcaremibraindedicatedbrainpetandcomparisonwiththewholebodyanddedicatedbrainpetsystems |