Cargando…

Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: The treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly has always been a controversial issue. The aim in this study was to compare the curative effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (CPH) on femoral intertrochanteric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Shenghu, Liu, Jun, Zhen, Ping, Shen, Weiwei, Chang, Yanfeng, Zhang, Haoqiang, Zhu, Qingsheng, Li, Xusheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2793-8
_version_ 1783464040094236672
author Zhou, Shenghu
Liu, Jun
Zhen, Ping
Shen, Weiwei
Chang, Yanfeng
Zhang, Haoqiang
Zhu, Qingsheng
Li, Xusheng
author_facet Zhou, Shenghu
Liu, Jun
Zhen, Ping
Shen, Weiwei
Chang, Yanfeng
Zhang, Haoqiang
Zhu, Qingsheng
Li, Xusheng
author_sort Zhou, Shenghu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly has always been a controversial issue. The aim in this study was to compare the curative effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (CPH) on femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. METHODS: From March 2008 to December 2012, 108 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated by PFNA or CPH. There were 63 males and 45 females, aged 75.3–99.1 years [(83.7 ± 5.6) years]. The patients’ bone mineral density was routinely measured, and the fractures were classified according to Evans-Jensen. The patients were divided into CPH group and PFNA group. The differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, immobilization duration, hospitalization time, Harris scores and postoperative complications including deep venous thrombosis, lung and urinary infection were analyzed. RESULTS: All patients were followed for 12.5–36.2 months [(28.0 ± 6.3) months)]. The operation time was (53.7 ± 15.2) min and (77.5 ± 16.8) min in PFNA group and CPH group, respectively (P < 0.05); intraoperative bleeding was (132.5 ± 33.2) mL and (286.3 ± 43.2) mL, respectively (P < 0.05); immobilization duration was (28.2 ± 3.7) days and (3.1 ± 1.2) days, respectively (P < 0.05); hospitalization time was (7.6 ± 1.8) days and (6.9 ± 2.2) days, respectively (P > 0.05); and the Harris scores after 1 year were (87.7 ± 7.9) points and (88.3 ± 9.2) points, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both PFNA and CPH are safe and effective treatments for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. Nonetheless, CPH allows faster mobilization and recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration Number: ChiCTR1900022846. Reg Date:2019-04-26 00:27:33 Retrospective registration
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6820901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68209012019-11-04 Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study Zhou, Shenghu Liu, Jun Zhen, Ping Shen, Weiwei Chang, Yanfeng Zhang, Haoqiang Zhu, Qingsheng Li, Xusheng BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly has always been a controversial issue. The aim in this study was to compare the curative effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (CPH) on femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. METHODS: From March 2008 to December 2012, 108 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated by PFNA or CPH. There were 63 males and 45 females, aged 75.3–99.1 years [(83.7 ± 5.6) years]. The patients’ bone mineral density was routinely measured, and the fractures were classified according to Evans-Jensen. The patients were divided into CPH group and PFNA group. The differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, immobilization duration, hospitalization time, Harris scores and postoperative complications including deep venous thrombosis, lung and urinary infection were analyzed. RESULTS: All patients were followed for 12.5–36.2 months [(28.0 ± 6.3) months)]. The operation time was (53.7 ± 15.2) min and (77.5 ± 16.8) min in PFNA group and CPH group, respectively (P < 0.05); intraoperative bleeding was (132.5 ± 33.2) mL and (286.3 ± 43.2) mL, respectively (P < 0.05); immobilization duration was (28.2 ± 3.7) days and (3.1 ± 1.2) days, respectively (P < 0.05); hospitalization time was (7.6 ± 1.8) days and (6.9 ± 2.2) days, respectively (P > 0.05); and the Harris scores after 1 year were (87.7 ± 7.9) points and (88.3 ± 9.2) points, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both PFNA and CPH are safe and effective treatments for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. Nonetheless, CPH allows faster mobilization and recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration Number: ChiCTR1900022846. Reg Date:2019-04-26 00:27:33 Retrospective registration BioMed Central 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6820901/ /pubmed/31664982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2793-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Shenghu
Liu, Jun
Zhen, Ping
Shen, Weiwei
Chang, Yanfeng
Zhang, Haoqiang
Zhu, Qingsheng
Li, Xusheng
Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study
title Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study
title_full Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study
title_short Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study
title_sort proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31664982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2793-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoushenghu proximalfemoralnailantirotationversuscementlessbipolarhemiarthroplastyforunstablefemoralintertrochantericfractureintheelderlyaretrospectivestudy
AT liujun proximalfemoralnailantirotationversuscementlessbipolarhemiarthroplastyforunstablefemoralintertrochantericfractureintheelderlyaretrospectivestudy
AT zhenping proximalfemoralnailantirotationversuscementlessbipolarhemiarthroplastyforunstablefemoralintertrochantericfractureintheelderlyaretrospectivestudy
AT shenweiwei proximalfemoralnailantirotationversuscementlessbipolarhemiarthroplastyforunstablefemoralintertrochantericfractureintheelderlyaretrospectivestudy
AT changyanfeng proximalfemoralnailantirotationversuscementlessbipolarhemiarthroplastyforunstablefemoralintertrochantericfractureintheelderlyaretrospectivestudy
AT zhanghaoqiang proximalfemoralnailantirotationversuscementlessbipolarhemiarthroplastyforunstablefemoralintertrochantericfractureintheelderlyaretrospectivestudy
AT zhuqingsheng proximalfemoralnailantirotationversuscementlessbipolarhemiarthroplastyforunstablefemoralintertrochantericfractureintheelderlyaretrospectivestudy
AT lixusheng proximalfemoralnailantirotationversuscementlessbipolarhemiarthroplastyforunstablefemoralintertrochantericfractureintheelderlyaretrospectivestudy